Hide table of contents

TLDR:

Most EA and AI Safety groups don’t do enough marketing, so we would like to change that. See our (currently MVP) notion page to apply for help (it's free!). 
We are also hiring.

Why:

Several people have pointed out in the past on the forum that marketing is underutilized in the EA and AI Safety ecosystem.[1] Since then, two great initiatives sprung up to address this gap. These are User Friendly and Good Impressions. I think they are great, but currently supporting local groups is outside of their scope.[2]

At the beginning of every semester, university groups are hustling to get applicants to their courses, and many city groups as there is a lack of new members joining. For this reason, we think there is a lot of low-hanging fruit that we could pick up by (1) making organisers aware that they can request support for marketing courses and other programs (2) and then setting up paid social media ads for their platforms.

Background of this project

Over the past ~2 years, we had a lot of success for our national group (EA Hungary) with using paid social media ads to attract diverse and talented participants to our courses, at quite a low cost. Since this initial cost-effectiveness analysis, we have been slowly increasing the budget of our campaigns and experimenting with different approaches. In the past months, we have started expanding our scope and supported a few other groups as well, to see how much these results transfer to other countries. Although our data analysis is still in process, the results seem promising so far which is why we are excited to scale the program further and spin out a new organisation focusing on this area.

Apply for support

You can apply for support here (it’s free), and read more about the project on our notion page (which is just an MVP for now).

Working with us just involves 4 easy steps, to minimize the amount of time that is needed on your end.

  1. You share your initial plans in this form (~5 mins).
  2. We will give you some feedback and suggestions via email, and send you a second form to confirm your ads. (~15 minutes).
  3. We will set up the ads for you, and invite you for a ~20-30 min call well we walk you through how the marketing campaign will look like, to finalize everything and make sure you are satisfied with our plans. At the end of the call, we launch the campaign together.
  4. After your program ends, we will follow up with you to get feedback and assess the success of the campaign.

Our team

Gergő Gáspár is co-director for the European Network for AI Safety (ENAIS) and founded EA & AIS Hungary. His background is in psychology and he has 4+ years of experience in community building.

Milán Alexy is the Director for EA Hungary and Head of Operations of AI Safety Hungary. His background is in economics and behavioural science.

The advisor of this project is Marta Krzeminska, a seasoned marketing professional who was previously Head of Marketing for Mindease. 

Merell Lystra is our social media assistant and has been doing the lion’s share of work during the summer. However she is starting a new university program in September, so her involvement will decrease with the project in the coming months.

Conclusion

We are very excited about this project and think that marketing can be a key driver for growing our communities. Consider working with us if you are interested in contributing to this vision!

  1. ^
  2. ^

    There were some adjacent projects though, e.g. Good Impressions has done some marketing for Bluedot in the past, and User-friendly helped GWWC with advertising and web traffic. My understanding though is that they are not actively seeking out to support local groups. Good Impression has told us that they would be open to supporting an organisation focusing on this (which is great news for us!).

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from gergo
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 12m read
 · 
Economic growth is a unique field, because it is relevant to both the global development side of EA and the AI side of EA. Global development policy can be informed by models that offer helpful diagnostics into the drivers of growth, while growth models can also inform us about how AI progress will affect society. My friend asked me to create a growth theory reading list for an average EA who is interested in applying growth theory to EA concerns. This is my list. (It's shorter and more balanced between AI/GHD than this list) I hope it helps anyone who wants to dig into growth questions themselves. These papers require a fair amount of mathematical maturity. If you don't feel confident about your math, I encourage you to start with Jones 2016 to get a really strong grounding in the facts of growth, with some explanations in words for how growth economists think about fitting them into theories. Basics of growth These two papers cover the foundations of growth theory. They aren't strictly essential for understanding the other papers, but they're helpful and likely where you should start if you have no background in growth. Jones 2016 Sociologically, growth theory is all about finding facts that beg to be explained. For half a century, growth theory was almost singularly oriented around explaining the "Kaldor facts" of growth. These facts organize what theories are entertained, even though they cannot actually validate a theory – after all, a totally incorrect theory could arrive at the right answer by chance. In this way, growth theorists are engaged in detective work; they try to piece together the stories that make sense given the facts, making leaps when they have to. This places the facts of growth squarely in the center of theorizing, and Jones 2016 is the most comprehensive treatment of those facts, with accessible descriptions of how growth models try to represent those facts. You will notice that I recommend more than a few papers by Chad Jones in this
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achieve 25% on its Frontier Math
Omnizoid
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Edit 1/29: Funding is back, baby!  Crossposted from my blog.   (This could end up being the most important thing I’ve ever written. Please like and restack it—if you have a big blog, please write about it). A mother holds her sick baby to her chest. She knows he doesn’t have long to live. She hears him coughing—those body-wracking coughs—that expel mucus and phlegm, leaving him desperately gasping for air. He is just a few months old. And yet that’s how old he will be when he dies. The aforementioned scene is likely to become increasingly common in the coming years. Fortunately, there is still hope. Trump recently signed an executive order shutting off almost all foreign aid. Most terrifyingly, this included shutting off the PEPFAR program—the single most successful foreign aid program in my lifetime. PEPFAR provides treatment and prevention of HIV and AIDS—it has saved about 25 million people since its implementation in 2001, despite only taking less than 0.1% of the federal budget. Every single day that it is operative, PEPFAR supports: > * More than 222,000 people on treatment in the program collecting ARVs to stay healthy; > * More than 224,000 HIV tests, newly diagnosing 4,374 people with HIV – 10% of whom are pregnant women attending antenatal clinic visits; > * Services for 17,695 orphans and vulnerable children impacted by HIV; > * 7,163 cervical cancer screenings, newly diagnosing 363 women with cervical cancer or pre-cancerous lesions, and treating 324 women with positive cervical cancer results; > * Care and support for 3,618 women experiencing gender-based violence, including 779 women who experienced sexual violence. The most important thing PEPFAR does is provide life-saving anti-retroviral treatments to millions of victims of HIV. More than 20 million people living with HIV globally depend on daily anti-retrovirals, including over half a million children. These children, facing a deadly illness in desperately poor countries, are now going