Hide table of contents

You might have seen this headline. Ahold Delhaize announces protein split target of 50% by 2030 for European food retail brands. Great thing for animals right? Let's dig deeper.

The Meat Reduction Commitment

Ahold Delhaize, a top 20 European supermarket has committed 50% of their protein sales to come from plant based sources by 2030. Reading the entire press release one does not see a single mention of animal welfare in the copy. References to animals, rather look like this.

By rebalancing protein sales and advancing the development of lower carbon emission animal products, Ahold Delhaize is addressing emissions in line with its climate ambition.

While supporting the shift to more plant-based proteins, we also work closely with our animal protein producers and suppliers to help reduce the environmental impact of their products

Actively promoting plant-based product ranges and offering lower-carbon animal protein assortments.

Working together with farmers and partners to reduce emissions of animal protein products.

Perhaps the reason we don't see animal welfare mentioned is highlighted here

Ahold Delhaize’s commitment highlights its efforts to drive the transition to a healthier and more sustainable food system. Approximately 95% of the company’s emissions are outside of its own operations, within the value chain. This includes the footprint of all products sold in the stores of the local brands. Products that contain animal-based proteins represent the highest emissions due to land use, feed, and processing activities.

It appears that the driving force behind this change is Ahold Delhaize's Climate Plan to Net Zero. (Note: There potentially were advocacy groups also working with Ahold Delhaize on this, I'm just not aware of them and am grateful for their work if this is indeed the case. And also still see this commitment being driven by their net zero pledge) 

At the same time we see Ahold Delhaize's Czech brand Albert, taking legal against Czech Animal Protection Organisation, Obránci zvířat, in regard to their campaign to improve the lives of chickens raised for meat.

Google translated quotes from Czech news article

According to him, the criticism in the campaign is not based on the truth and is conducted only against Albert, even though chickens and other chains are taken from the same breeds

Two things from here:

  1. Welfare Footprint Project has compelling research showing the suffering of broiler chickens in standard production, that the Czech organisation used.
  2. In the Netherlands, where Ahold Delhaize is headquartered, they have already committed and met exceeded the standard that the Czech organisation is advocating for

This legal action is happening in Czechia in response to a campaign, in other European countries where Ahold Delhaize has not made similar commitments, targeted campaigns are not currently taking place and we do not see signs that Ahold Delhaize would be making these animal welfare commitments of their own accord.

The Tension

The small animal replacement problem is probably what some of you already are thinking about. And Bryant Research does a great job at explaining this concept if it is new to you. 

https://bryantresearch.co.uk/insight-items/solutions-small-body-problem/

Then in a subsequent post proposes a number of solutions. Where I think they rightly state.

The small body problem is even harder than you think. Animal advocates often rely on 3 key types of argument to convince people to reduce animal product consumption: environment, health and animal welfare. Arguments around the environmental and health impacts tend to favour chicken and fish over red meat, exacerbating the SBP. But animal welfare appeals are also a hard sell. 

It appears that Ahold Delhaize is prioritising climate above animal welfare.

The vast majority of Supermarkets in Europe have scope 3 emission targets. Madre Brava wrote a fantastic report, that looked at the largest 15 retailers in Europe scope 3 commitments and aligning with plant protein commitments.  What they find is that 93% of emissions are from scope 3, and meat and dairy emissions make up about half of this. Therefore, in order for a supermarket to meet their scope 3 emission reduction targets it is practically impossible to achieve this without a reduction of animal products sold or more specifically a reduction of animal products sold with large carbon footprints. Which creates a strong motivator for increased production and consumption of small bodied animals.

I think many of have wrestled with how to prevent and/or mitigate the small body problem as chicken consumption in particular continues to rise alongside the fall of most other animal products. Right now I think might be a moment to realign and acknowledge that in Europe it is probably going to accelerate.

The Solution

You tell me :-) 

My humble take is the scope 3 carbon commitments are going to force supermarkets to get creative with non animal proteins and use the significant power they have to shape consumer decisions to head in that direction over next 5-10 years. There are even bolder scope 3 emission targets for 2040-50 and the next couple of years can give us an insight into what these might look like, and their effect on animals.

It appears that in the next 5-10 years in Europe we might see unprecedented meat consumption happen, from a seemingly unrelated campaign, systematic carbon reduction. This is potentially a lesson for other parts of the world to invest in corporate carbon reduction campaigns to impact meat consumption.

Continue work on welfare improvements of small body/low carbon animals farmed at scale; such as laying hens, broilers, shrimps and other aquatic animals as it is likely that their numbers could still increase at worst and at best minimally be reduced. Welfare Footprint Project has conducted great studies to show the magnitude of some of these improvements. 

What did I miss? 

Ultimately, I think there is no one solution and way out of this. More European food companies making plant protein commitments in the coming months and years as companies work to meet their scope 3 carbon reduction pledges is a good thing. Progress is never perfect and it is fantastic to see Ahold Delhaize make this commitment. It highlights to me the areas where one can make a significant difference. Billions of farmed animals in Europe will be unaffected by these commitments and there is potential for their numbers to grow. It gives me more motivation to 'do my piece of the puzzle' alongside many others; see through the end of cages in Europe, the continued adoption of the better chicken commitment and the many other welfare improvements advocates are tirelessly working on across Europe.

I think EA aligned animal welfare work in Europe is focussed on the right things. But I've been wrong many times before, what else am I missing?

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Executive summary: Ahold Delhaize’s commitment to reducing supermarket meat sales in Europe is primarily driven by climate targets rather than animal welfare concerns, potentially exacerbating the shift towards small-bodied animals with higher welfare concerns.

Key points:

  1. Ahold Delhaize aims for 50% of its protein sales to be plant-based by 2030, but the company’s messaging emphasizes emissions reduction rather than animal welfare.
  2. The supermarket’s shift is driven by its net-zero climate pledge, as most of its emissions come from animal-based products, rather than explicit concern for animal suffering.
  3. Simultaneously, Ahold Delhaize’s Czech brand is taking legal action against an animal welfare group, suggesting resistance to animal welfare-driven reforms.
  4. The shift away from high-carbon meats may unintentionally increase the consumption of small-bodied animals (chickens, fish), which suffer under intensive farming conditions.
  5. The widespread adoption of Scope 3 carbon commitments across European supermarkets means meat reduction is likely to continue, but without targeted welfare improvements, small-bodied animal farming could expand.
  6. Future advocacy should focus on shaping corporate carbon reduction strategies to promote non-animal proteins while continuing welfare reforms for intensively farmed animals.

 

 

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
I wrote this to try to explain the key thing going on with AI right now to a broader audience. Feedback welcome. Most people think of AI as a pattern-matching chatbot – good at writing emails, terrible at real thinking. They've missed something huge. In 2024, while many declared AI was reaching a plateau, it was actually entering a new paradigm: learning to reason using reinforcement learning. This approach isn’t limited by data, so could deliver beyond-human capabilities in coding and scientific reasoning within two years. Here's a simple introduction to how it works, and why it's the most important development that most people have missed. The new paradigm: reinforcement learning People sometimes say “chatGPT is just next token prediction on the internet”. But that’s never been quite true. Raw next token prediction produces outputs that are regularly crazy. GPT only became useful with the addition of what’s called “reinforcement learning from human feedback” (RLHF): 1. The model produces outputs 2. Humans rate those outputs for helpfulness 3. The model is adjusted in a way expected to get a higher rating A model that’s under RLHF hasn’t been trained only to predict next tokens, it’s been trained to produce whatever output is most helpful to human raters. Think of the initial large language model (LLM) as containing a foundation of knowledge and concepts. Reinforcement learning is what enables that structure to be turned to a specific end. Now AI companies are using reinforcement learning in a powerful new way – training models to reason step-by-step: 1. Show the model a problem like a math puzzle. 2. Ask it to produce a chain of reasoning to solve the problem (“chain of thought”).[1] 3. If the answer is correct, adjust the model to be more like that (“reinforcement”).[2] 4. Repeat thousands of times. Before 2023 this didn’t seem to work. If each step of reasoning is too unreliable, then the chains quickly go wrong. Without getting close to co
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
My name is Keyvan, and I lead Anima International’s work in France. Our organization went through a major transformation in 2024. I want to share that journey with you. Anima International in France used to be known as Assiettes Végétales (‘Plant-Based Plates’). We focused entirely on introducing and promoting vegetarian and plant-based meals in collective catering. Today, as Anima, our mission is to put an end to the use of cages for laying hens. These changes come after a thorough evaluation of our previous campaign, assessing 94 potential new interventions, making several difficult choices, and navigating emotional struggles. We hope that by sharing our experience, we can help others who find themselves in similar situations. So let me walk you through how the past twelve months have unfolded for us.  The French team Act One: What we did as Assiettes Végétales Since 2018, we worked with the local authorities of cities, counties, regions, and universities across France to develop vegetarian meals in their collective catering services. If you don’t know much about France, this intervention may feel odd to you. But here, the collective catering sector feeds a huge number of people and produces an enormous quantity of meals. Two out of three children, more than seven million in total, eat at a school canteen at least once a week. Overall, more than three billion meals are served each year in collective catering. We knew that by influencing practices in this sector, we could reach a massive number of people. However, this work was not easy. France has a strong culinary heritage deeply rooted in animal-based products. Meat and fish-based meals remain the standard in collective catering and school canteens. It is effectively mandatory to serve a dairy product every day in school canteens. To be a certified chef, you have to complete special training and until recently, such training didn’t include a single vegetarian dish among the essential recipes to master. De
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
 The Life You Can Save, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting extreme poverty, and Founders Pledge, a global nonprofit empowering entrepreneurs to do the most good possible with their charitable giving, have announced today the formation of their Rapid Response Fund. In the face of imminent federal funding cuts, the Fund will ensure that some of the world's highest-impact charities and programs can continue to function. Affected organizations include those offering critical interventions, particularly in basic health services, maternal and child health, infectious disease control, mental health, domestic violence, and organized crime.