Hide table of contents

Remember to remember...


Part I 

Tell me if this sounds familiar...

You're walking to work one bright and caffeinated morning, and you find yourself rather engaged in a shiny train of thought. It feels novel, and important, and relevant to what matters. One might even go so far as to say engrossing.

Maybe it's a pattern in yourself or your organisation you've just seen has been playing out over years. Maybe a fresh philosophical perspective causing a cascade of re-framings on some important ideas. Or maybe, just maybe, in these crowds, it's a train of thought on how everything could be better. For you, for those you love, for everyone.

You feel the urge to write it down.

But hold on, what's this?

Curious, there's already a note in your phone, with the exact title you were about to use... from a year ago! It seems you've boarded on this joyride before, but ultimately failed to seize control and direct it anywhere useful.

If you're not running late to work, or distracted by a notification maybe you think to yourself... Man, I really need to make sure this time I actually explore this, it could have a big impact on how I want to spend my time. In fact... maybe I need some way to make sure I fully explore important thoughts I have in general.

And this thought, I should really make some space to come back to thoughts that felt important but I didn't have time to explore... feels like an important notion in its own right actually. You go to record that observation, that it's concerningly easy to forget to follow up even on thoughts that feel vitally important.

AND YOU FIND YOU WROTE THAT DOWN 2 YEARS AGO, AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

AND YOU THINK GOD, HOW MANY TIMES HAVE I CHANCED ON THOUGHTS I FELT COULD REALLY MATTER, AND DONE NOTHING WITH THEM?

And then, if you still haven't been interrupted, maybe you have the space to think:

OKAY.
CLEARLY, SOMETHING IS AMISS.
I'M GOING TO MAKE SPACE RIGHT NOW.
FOR THE NEXT HOUR I'M GOING TO LIST EVERYTHING I GOT EXCITED ABOUT BUT FORGOT TO EXPLORE.
AND WHILE I REMEMBER, I'M GOING TO MAKE A PLAN TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM IN GENERAL.
A PLAN TO STOP LOOPING, TO REMEMBER TO REMEMBER.

You tell work you'll be late, put your phone on aeroplane mode, and lock yourself in a closet. Aghast, you find it seems you've tried this before. Now that you're looking, you can see your life is strewn with past attempts. Weekly time set aside to journal you forgot to protect, digital reminders to take space for reflection slowly habituated to and ignored without you even noticing.

With the hour you have all you really manage to understand is... I'm going to need a lot more time.

Before the demands of life re-assert themselves, you go the requisite 6 months forward in your calendar to block out a month. You book the most isolated cabin you can find, and tell everyone you'll be taking a holiday.


This is the story of how I came to find myself a long way from home, frowning at my laptop in a cabin in Norway. Trying to remember why it was that I'd come here.

Coming up next: 🔅 Apollo

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I wonder why this got downvoted. This is an essential part of being a good researcher, and it's well written.

Btw! Where in Norway are you?

Thank you, I appreciate the kind words.

I had a "🔅" emoji in the title, which is my own personal symbol for this line of thought. Turns out an emoji in the title is a good way to immediately get downvoted through the floor and ruin your day 😅.

And I was in Iveland!  I'm back in Australia now writing up my thoughts, but I'd like very much to return. It was a beautiful country.

It displeases me that this forum is now a place where innocent and personality-unfolding shibboleths are frowned upon. I feel like we've been invaded by a mob o' hoity-toity professionalism-fanatics. I'm indubitably miffed, I say!

Stay beautifwl!

Curated and popular this week
jackva
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
 [Edits on March 10th for clarity, two sub-sections added] Watching what is happening in the world -- with lots of renegotiation of institutional norms within Western democracies and a parallel fracturing of the post-WW2 institutional order -- I do think we, as a community, should more seriously question our priors on the relative value of surgical/targeted and broad system-level interventions. Speaking somewhat roughly, with EA as a movement coming of age in an era where democratic institutions and the rule-based international order were not fundamentally questioned, it seems easy to underestimate how much the world is currently changing and how much riskier a world of stronger institutional and democratic backsliding and weakened international norms might be. Of course, working on these issues might be intractable and possibly there's nothing highly effective for EAs to do on the margin given much attention to these issues from society at large. So, I am not here to confidently state we should be working on these issues more. But I do think in a situation of more downside risk with regards to broad system-level changes and significantly more fluidity, it seems at least worth rigorously asking whether we should shift more attention to work that is less surgical (working on specific risks) and more systemic (working on institutional quality, indirect risk factors, etc.). While there have been many posts along those lines over the past months and there are of course some EA organizations working on these issues, it stil appears like a niche focus in the community and none of the major EA and EA-adjacent orgs (including the one I work for, though I am writing this in a personal capacity) seem to have taken it up as a serious focus and I worry it might be due to baked-in assumptions about the relative value of such work that are outdated in a time where the importance of systemic work has changed in the face of greater threat and fluidity. When the world seems to
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Forethought[1] is a new AI macrostrategy research group cofounded by Max Dalton, Will MacAskill, Tom Davidson, and Amrit Sidhu-Brar. We are trying to figure out how to navigate the (potentially rapid) transition to a world with superintelligent AI systems. We aim to tackle the most important questions we can find, unrestricted by the current Overton window. More details on our website. Why we exist We think that AGI might come soon (say, modal timelines to mostly-automated AI R&D in the next 2-8 years), and might significantly accelerate technological progress, leading to many different challenges. We don’t yet have a good understanding of what this change might look like or how to navigate it. Society is not prepared. Moreover, we want the world to not just avoid catastrophe: we want to reach a really great future. We think about what this might be like (incorporating moral uncertainty), and what we can do, now, to build towards a good future. Like all projects, this started out with a plethora of Google docs. We ran a series of seminars to explore the ideas further, and that cascaded into an organization. This area of work feels to us like the early days of EA: we’re exploring unusual, neglected ideas, and finding research progress surprisingly tractable. And while we start out with (literally) galaxy-brained schemes, they often ground out into fairly specific and concrete ideas about what should happen next. Of course, we’re bringing principles like scope sensitivity, impartiality, etc to our thinking, and we think that these issues urgently need more morally dedicated and thoughtful people working on them. Research Research agendas We are currently pursuing the following perspectives: * Preparing for the intelligence explosion: If AI drives explosive growth there will be an enormous number of challenges we have to face. In addition to misalignment risk and biorisk, this potentially includes: how to govern the development of new weapons of mass destr
Sam Anschell
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
*Disclaimer* I am writing this post in a personal capacity; the opinions I express are my own and do not represent my employer. I think that more people and orgs (especially nonprofits) should consider negotiating the cost of sizable expenses. In my experience, there is usually nothing to lose by respectfully asking to pay less, and doing so can sometimes save thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per hour. This is because negotiating doesn’t take very much time[1], savings can persist across multiple years, and counterparties can be surprisingly generous with discounts. Here are a few examples of expenses that may be negotiable: For organizations * Software or news subscriptions * Of 35 corporate software and news providers I’ve negotiated with, 30 have been willing to provide discounts. These discounts range from 10% to 80%, with an average of around 40%. * Leases * A friend was able to negotiate a 22% reduction in the price per square foot on a corporate lease and secured a couple months of free rent. This led to >$480,000 in savings for their nonprofit. Other negotiable parameters include: * Square footage counted towards rent costs * Lease length * A tenant improvement allowance * Certain physical goods (e.g., smart TVs) * Buying in bulk can be a great lever for negotiating smaller items like covid tests, and can reduce costs by 50% or more. * Event/retreat venues (both venue price and smaller items like food and AV) * Hotel blocks * A quick email with the rates of comparable but more affordable hotel blocks can often save ~10%. * Professional service contracts with large for-profit firms (e.g., IT contracts, office internet coverage) * Insurance premiums (though I am less confident that this is negotiable) For many products and services, a nonprofit can qualify for a discount simply by providing their IRS determination letter or getting verified on platforms like TechSoup. In my experience, most vendors and companies