All of KevinO's Comments + Replies

Answer by KevinOApr 12, 20242
1
0

Keeping Absolutes in Mind - I think donating money is still somewhat underrated in discussions like this, though I was happy to see it brought up in several comments.

Consider taking the GWWC pledge or TLYCS pledge (easier / more flexible) or some other pledge if you feel like that would help with keeping motivation up. 


You could also organize or contribute to a local group. Regular local group attendance could also keep motivation up (and would be a lot less costly for your budget).

 

Even a small donor can make a real impact for individuals direct... (read more)

Answer by KevinOJul 10, 20236
0
0

The Nonlinear Library podcast reads upvoted posts on the EA Forum, Lesswrong, and Alignment forum with an AI voice (that's not bad): Listen to more EA content with The Nonlinear Library

Some other career orgs:
 

And for what it's worth, 80,000 Hours has a bunch global health & animal related postings on their job board.

We could still use more short, casual videos to win tens of thousands of dollars for effective charities! See Project for Awesome 2023: Make a short video for an EA charity!

There's a subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/EffectiveAltruism/

I think the comments aren't exactly what you'd get on this forum but some of them are helpful and accurate.

2
JakubK
1y
Thanks! 1st link is my doc, 2nd + 3rd + 4th are on Stafforini's list of EA syllabi, and the 5th link is in my doc.
1
Kyle Smith
1y
Perfect!! Thank you.
4
High Impact Professionals
1y
Yes! This is the right answer. We have a question about this on the sign up form and plan on forwarding those interested to the EA good governance project.

The EA subreddit is getting more participation from critics and/or people understandably upset about FTX. This is resulting in some low quality posts hitting the frontpage of the subreddit, since it's so small and not very active.

I used to donate monthly instead of at the end of the year. I eventually decided there were advantages to donating at the end of the year* , though there may be ways to seek both benefits like donating a small portion monthly to get the good good feelings more often.

* orgs have a more complete picture of their funding need, donation matching opportunities, maybe you'd benefit from something like donating stock which may have some overhead you don't want to repeat, you have the most information available, evaluators have put out their new recommendations, ...

1
Max Pietsch
1y
Cool thanks for your thoughts KevinO. Those are good points.
Answer by KevinONov 09, 20222
0
0

The Effective Institutions Project might count as this. There may be more relevant projects, depending on what counts - like the Simon Institute for Longterm Governance, the Center for Election Science.

The kinds of things filed under "Broad Longtermism", perhaps.

Maybe work on impact markets and prediction markets.
(For some reason I didn't fully read acylhalide's answer and I see that I listed some of the same things.)

Answer by KevinOOct 17, 20221
0
0

Bonus, from the EA Newsletter: If you’re interested in policy or global development, you may also want to check Tom Wein’s list of social purpose job boards.

I don't want to imply that this must be a barrier to action, but how much time have you spent digging in to questions relevant to cause prioritization? Your priorities might change as you investigate more.

Here are a couple flowcharts - if you haven't engaged with a particular question before, like really grappled with whether animals have moral status, you might find your priorities change as you think through these considerations.

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/TCtbuGC3yBisToXxZ/a-guided-cause-prioritisation-flowchart

http://globalprioritiesproje... (read more)

1
Fabien Le Guillarm
2y
Thanks, I have started to dig into the causes mainly through listening to podcasts and it really shifted my perspective on many causes; and actually let me to that post, but these flowcharts are new to me - I’ll dive in, thanks !
Answer by KevinOOct 12, 20221
0
0

Local or online groups may have career workshops or 1-1s available with people who could offer advice.

I'd say start with this opportunities board https://ea-internships.pory.app/ - you can filter for volunteer opportunities. Heck, maybe some part-time work would be relevant as well.


There's also this Facebook group for EA volunteering https://www.facebook.com/groups/1392613437498240

You could also try things like applying to EAGx Virtual and try to find out about projects by just asking people.

1
Fabien Le Guillarm
2y
Thanks a lot! I will check this out.
Answer by KevinOSep 30, 20226
0
0

I'd guess that a lot of non-longtermist, non-EA-meta charities are more more likely to be funding constrained and less likely to be topped up by FTX. I also suspect FTX isn't taking up all the opportunities for organizations to spend money, even for the ones it supports.

I suspect organizations with a research focus, such as Sentience Institute, ALLFED, and other answers on this post, are often happy to hire more researcher time with marginal donations.

Organizations that do marketing probably have room to spend more there, such as 80,000 Hours and Giving Wh... (read more)

What's the minimum sized audience that you'd be happy to present to?

2
Giving What We Can
2y
Hi Kevin, we'd probably be able to arrange for someone to speak if there was an audience of 10 or more! Obviously the bigger the better :) Or we could try and combine several smaller groups for a virtual event!

Will is promoting longtermism as a key moral priority - merely one of our priorities, not the sole priority. He'll say things like (heavily paraphrased from my  memory) "we spend so little on existential risk reduction - I don't know how much we should spend, but maybe once we're spending 1% of GDP we can come back and revisit the question".

It's therefore disappointing to me when people write responses like this, responding to the not-widely-promoted idea that longtermism should be the only priority.

A bit of a sidestep but there there is also the new Longtermism Fund , for more legible longtermist donations that are probably easier to justify.

I think that is discussed in https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/dsCTSCbfHWxmAr2ZT/open-ea-global (perhaps more directly in the comments if only indirectly in the main post, I don't quite recall).

I think it's because the conferences are networking-focused and the organizers want the attendees to be likely to have productive meetings (like if you physically bump in to someone, CEA wants high odds that they  can help you or you can help them).

(Please correct me if I am wrong.)

I assume the broad categories for rejection from EAG are that CEA doesn'... (read more)

8
Fermi–Dirac Distribution
2y
I think this part is wrong.  Eli Nathan has said the following: So it seems that they do not explicitly compare applicants with each other when making admissions decisions. [1]   1. ^ Which, unrelatedly, is very confusing. My EAG SF 2020 rejection email said  The email also linked to this EA Forum post from December 2019, which says  and  I'm not sure if Eli Nathan's comment is implying that these statements I quoted were false at the time they were made, or if the CEA has changed its mind since EAG SF 2020 about whether to limit the number of attendees or not. ... okay, so I just read a few more of Eli Nathan's comments and I am now really confused. For instance, he's said the following (emphasis mine) This appears to directly contradict the December 2019 EA Forum post I linked to.  

In case anyone else is curious, the podcast is Ben Yeoh Chats

4
Ben Yeoh
2y
Thanks!  I will link to a few examples in case of interest: Larry Temkin with EA critiques: https://www.thendobetter.com/arts/2022/7/24/larry-temkin-transitivity-critiques-of-effective-altruism-international-aid-pluralism-podcast Leopold Aschenbrenner, x-risk, EA: https://www.thendobetter.com/arts/2021/6/22/leopold-aschenbrenner-on-existential-risk-german-culture-valedictorian-efficiency-podcast and many other random topics, for EAs, this one with Alex Stapp who thinks about the EA framework with his thinktank, Institute for Progress: https://www.thendobetter.com/investing/2022/2/28/alec-stapp-policy-for-progress-under-researched-areas-science-of-science-biosecurity-podcast

I appreciate the link. I didn't make good use of it, unfortunately - instead of reading it carefully I searched the page for the acronym hoping to find an expansion, and didn't end up reading the list of properties.

I am told that APS, in this context, stands for "advanced, planning, strategically aware" and is from Carlsmith's report https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13353

3
elifland
2y
Yup, I linked the text "APS-AI" in the post to the relevant section of the report. Sorry if it wasn't that noticeable!

NPR ask for personal messages from people involved in their local EA communities to play during a live interview with William MacAskill: https://www.reddit.com/r/EffectiveAltruism/comments/wq1nlm/help_with_upcoming_npr_interview_with_william/ 

To the extent that I'm outside of the general population I think it's because of my giving, but I generally feel squarely inside the box of ordinary people. I can relate to not feeling as smart as many EAs.

I think there are numerous things a typical person could do to take EA ideas and try to concretely make the world a better place:

One action that I think is broadly available is to join some advocacy group for EA-related policies on some local / regional / national level like animal welfare, electoral reform, sane land use policy, or something else. You c... (read more)

2
Olivia Addy
2y
Some great ideas here, thank you! I've talked to my husband a lot about EA but like you do find it a bit challenging to branch out to others. I think this is something worth me working on though.
3
Anton Rodenhauser
2y
That's a great point! In fact, my next step was contacting them. Anyone knows them and might be able to introduce me?

I know that professional grant makers think that last-dollar funding is not cost effective because they aren't funding more projects, but aren't out of dollars.

None of our big donors were intending to spend all of their funding before now. It's taken Open Phil years to grow their capacity and increase their giving in line with their standards of diligence. They intend to spend down their funds, I believe, within the lifetime of their funders.

With respect to the last dollar of funding: I think Open Philanthropy expects to spend their last dollar on something more cost-effective than GiveDirectly. So I think the last dollar of spending will still look good, and at the worst case your spending now will move some other funding to something somewhat less effective but still pretty good down the line.

Another potential advantage for an individual donor would be identifying something not currently receiving large amounts of funding that you think is worth taking a bet on. That would give the initiativ... (read more)

1
KevinO
2y
None of our big donors were intending to spend all of their funding before now. It's taken Open Phil years to grow their capacity and increase their giving in line with their standards of diligence. They intend to spend down their funds, I believe, within the lifetime of their funders.

Sounds like an ugh field. Spencer Greenberg also had a podcast episode on motivation recently, including backchaining to your ultimate motivations through a series of "why" questions in order to access more motivating feelings. 

My random advice would be to book a friend or maybe some EA whose done it before to walk you through the process and provide their flight-booking wisdom (a pretense or useful or both) like "you have to pay for a checked bag both ways so maybe it's better to upgrade to the seat with a free checked bag".

2
Jonathan Nankivell
2y
Thanks for the pointers. I've reread this now - it is a good read and interesting throughout! Intriguing though health economics is, I think I am more focused on the actual treatments. I want to understand, when faced with a patient, the methods that can be used to pick the treatment. I am interested in how effective each method would be for the patient and how well they would scale to an entire population. It seems strange that these questions have been omitted in a book comparing healthcare systems.

I appreciate that I can donate to Polish Centre for International Aid via their Facebook fundraiser for Ukraine, instead of having to figure out crypto.

2
Michael
2y
Good catch :)

Just to note these:

- Outreach to high schoolers has been tried in the form of Students for High Impact Charity. Their postmortem is here https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/3HaXa7dtu86NQNEZJ/shic-will-suspend-outreach-operations 

- I think I recall that one of the EA funds (longterm or meta) funded a project to give top math competitors copies of Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality. I'm not sure whether any retrospective for that effort is available.

How does one donate to the Effective Institutions Project?

5
IanDavidMoss
2y
Thanks for your interest! I'm hoping to get us set up for online donations in the near future, but until then, the easiest thing is to write me here or at ian@effectiveinstitutionsproject.org and I'll send you some options for check/wire.

Great post William, thanks!

Get $50 to donate to charity at 2pm EST/11am PST (Nov 18) at the following url: https://www.tisbest.org/redefinegifting/
 

3
WilliamKiely
2y
Thanks, Kevin! The gift cards may potentially not run out for a few more hours, so I made a post to try to get it more visibility: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/68drEr2nfLhcJ3mTD/free-usd50-charity-gift-card-giveaway-happening-now

I appreciate this writeup! Some of the interventions and insights were new to me even after attempting my own research in to improving sleep quality.

0
Ben Williamson
2y
Cheers! It's great to know that this work has been useful, or at least interesting, for people.

Adjacent opportunity: grants from Scott Alexander / Astral Codex Ten https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/apply-for-an-acx-grant 

Also the adjacent Emergent Ventures grants https://www.mercatus.org/emergent-ventures 

Load more