Indeed the reframed definitions put ideas in places more properly. So basically what majority of people can do easily is ordinary, and what only minority can do easily is extra ordinary. Although I get the spirit and sense of this, but I can also see a very clear misunderstanding of this possible. For example, only a few people can kill or murder people coldly but they are psychopaths. Surely extra-ordinary at something, but that something is a chaotic thing. A lot of extra-ordinary people turn out to loose sense enough to have corrupted minds.
Overall, I think it's more of a 80-20 rule. 20% extra ordinaries are useless even with their 80% contributions, unless the 80% of ordinaries contribute their 20%. The 20% contributions from 80% ordinaries is eventually equally essential as the 80% contribution from 20%, in order to achieve and maintain effective overall outcomes.
Great ideas and important concepts that needs to be discussed more widely. Although I don't find the base dichotomy of Ordinary, and Extra-ordinary to be very reliable or natural analogy with Bonobos, and Chimps. I think the fundamental difference between them is meaningful and significant enough agency. The "ordinary" is way more extra than "extra-ordinary" the moment they develop awareness and realization to exercise their agency or something great.
Indeed the reframed definitions put ideas in places more properly. So basically what majority of people can do easily is ordinary, and what only minority can do easily is extra ordinary. Although I get the spirit and sense of this, but I can also see a very clear misunderstanding of this possible. For example, only a few people can kill or murder people coldly but they are psychopaths. Surely extra-ordinary at something, but that something is a chaotic thing. A lot of extra-ordinary people turn out to loose sense enough to have corrupted minds.
Overall, I think it's more of a 80-20 rule. 20% extra ordinaries are useless even with their 80% contributions, unless the 80% of ordinaries contribute their 20%. The 20% contributions from 80% ordinaries is eventually equally essential as the 80% contribution from 20%, in order to achieve and maintain effective overall outcomes.
Great ideas and important concepts that needs to be discussed more widely. Although I don't find the base dichotomy of Ordinary, and Extra-ordinary to be very reliable or natural analogy with Bonobos, and Chimps.
I think the fundamental difference between them is meaningful and significant enough agency. The "ordinary" is way more extra than "extra-ordinary" the moment they develop awareness and realization to exercise their agency or something great.