I see the Pangram label on this post. For transparency: this essay emerged from extensive iterative dialogue between me and an AI assistant (conceptual framing, argument structure, editing), and I take full responsibility for the final claims. I'm a new user and this is my first post here—I'm genuinely interested in feedback on whether the concepts hold up, regardless of how they were produced. If the label affects how you read it, I'd be curious to know what would make the human contribution visible to you.
I'm particularly curious whether the distinction between corrigibility (system-level) and temporal sovereignty (subject-level) resonates with people working on AI governance. Is this a gap you've noticed, or is it already covered by existing frameworks I'm missing?
I see the Pangram label on this post. For transparency: this essay emerged from extensive iterative dialogue between me and an AI assistant (conceptual framing, argument structure, editing), and I take full responsibility for the final claims. I'm a new user and this is my first post here—I'm genuinely interested in feedback on whether the concepts hold up, regardless of how they were produced. If the label affects how you read it, I'd be curious to know what would make the human contribution visible to you.
I'm particularly curious whether the distinction between corrigibility (system-level) and temporal sovereignty (subject-level) resonates with people working on AI governance. Is this a gap you've noticed, or is it already covered by existing frameworks I'm missing?