Hide table of contents

Summary

Are you looking for an impactful role in AI safety? Look no further! 

Kairos is a recently founded AI safety fieldbuilding organization with the mission of mitigating the risks from advanced AI by helping fill talent gaps and needs within the field. Our programs, such as SPAR, currently support hundreds of people going into AI safety each year, and we’re looking to scale up as we grow our programs and start new ones. 

We’re looking for a skilled generalist or operations professional to help grow our organization as our third employee. This role would have a salary of $80,000 to $130,000 plus benefits, and we think this is a unique opportunity to get involved in multiple high-impact AI safety projects and help us build our org from the ground up.

 

Apply now!

 

About Kairos

Kairos manages a portfolio of different AI safety fieldbuilding projects, including:

  • SPAR: A 3-month AI safety research fellowship for over 150 people to try their hand at technical, policy, and strategy research, mentored by over 40 researchers.
  • FSP: A program to support the network of ~50 AI safety university groups around the world with mentorship, workshops, connection opportunities, and other resources. 

Kairos is built as an agile organization that can adjust to the field’s changing needs. We anticipate we’ll continue to take on new fieldbuilding projects in the future. We're small (you'll be employee #3!), which means you'll have an outsized impact and the chance to shape how we grow.

About the role

We’re looking for either a Head of Operations or a Founding Generalist to play a key role in planning and executing our portfolio of projects across group support and research programs.

In this role, you’ll be a key player in helping scale Kairos’s programs. Your responsibilities will span program management, participant recruitment and communications, developing systems to make our programs more efficient and, potentially, managing people as we grow. As a founding team member in a small, dynamic organization, you'll have significant ownership over your work and the opportunity to shape Kairos's future direction.

The distinction between Head of Operations and Founding Generalist would mostly come down to seniority in operations experience, as well as appetite for handling a broad set of strategy and planning tasks. Being the third employee in the organization, we expect that whoever takes the role will need to be ready to wear many different hats alongside the rest of the team. As a result, we're open to tailoring this role to the right candidate's interests and aptitudes.

What you'll do

  • Manage programs: Drive forward our existing programs (SPAR and FSP), develop processes to make them more effective, and potentially help design new ones.
  • Program operations: Working alongside the team to execute program logistics, like recruiting participants, filtering applications, and managing communications with program participants.
  • Building systems: Set up and manage key systems and processes to enable the execution of our projects, including a CRM, as well as systems for program applications, participant tracking, measurement and evaluation, and surveys.
  • Event planning and logistics: Coordinate virtual and in-person events including booking travel and accommodation, booking and coordinating with event venues, finding and working with caterers, and other logistical tasks. Examples of events we’ve run are OASIS, a series of university organizer workshops, or meetups for SPAR.
  • People management: As we grow, you may eventually manage future contractors or team members.
  • Wear many hats: In a small org, everyone pitches in where needed. You'll need to be open to tackling whatever comes up.

About you

An ideal candidate will have most or all of the following characteristics: 

  • You’re adaptable: You thrive in a fast-paced environment where priorities can shift quickly. We need someone that’s flexible, willing to adapt and anticipate these shifts. By default, you should assume that your priorities in 2026 will look different from those in 2025.
  • You’re agentic: You don't need much direction to get things done and can proactively plan and execute on tasks. You’re intentional with what you’re doing, you avoid groupthink, and you embrace taking on ambitious goals.
  • You’re organized: You can juggle multiple projects without dropping balls.
  • You have strong operations experience: You have experience running operations for different kinds of projects, be it programs or events, either in-person or remotely.
  • You can efficiently prioritize: You can prioritize and execute on complex projects and tasks, with minimal oversight. You can effectively schedule your week as new tasks and priorities emerge.
  • You’re systems-oriented: You feel comfortable using common workflow tools, as well as creating and maintaining spreadsheets, or using tools like Airtable or Asana to keep track of things. You’re comfortable leveraging AI when it can accelerate your work.
  • You have good people skills: You enjoy working with different personalities and building relationships. We spend a lot of time meeting with stakeholders and talking to participants in our programs, and we're looking for someone who shares our enthusiasm for these interactions.
  • You have strong communication skills: You can write clearly and communicate effectively with a range of diverse stakeholders. When communicating internally, you can effectively leverage reasoning transparency.

While not required, we prefer candidates who also have:

  • A foundational understanding of AI risk and a strong desire to reduce catastrophic risks from AI.
  • Previous experience working within AI safety or adjacent communities and familiarity with similar programs to ours (e.g. OSP, SPAR, MATS, GovAI, etc).

Why work with us?

  • You'll have real ownership over your work and the chance to shape how Kairos operates. We believe our programs have substantial room to grow and improve, and you would have a key role in making this happen.
  • Given the relatively complex nature of the role, we’re extra committed to supporting you to ensure you’re successful in this role. We won’t throw you off the deep end, and you’ll never be asked to do tasks we wouldn’t do ourselves.
  • As Kairos expands, your role will likely evolve with your interests and skills. We’re perpetually growing and learning and believe Kairos is a great place to gain experience in multiple different domains.
  • You'll regularly collaborate with leading AI safety stakeholders, building valuable connections across the field.

Compensation and benefits

The base compensation for this position will vary between $80,000 and $130,000 (USD) with a 10% 401k or an equivalent 10% unconditional pension contribution. The exact salary will depend on the candidate’s seniority level and, in the case of other countries, a potential cost of living adjustment. 

Our benefits include: flexible working hours, competitive health insurance, dental/vision insurance, a generous vacation policy, and a generous professional development budget.

Logistics

  • The start date for this role would be late April to early June.
  • This is a remote opportunity, but you’ll be expected to travel a few times a year for conferences, typically in the US.
  • We’d also be happy for you to work out of any AI safety office in Berkeley, London, or Boston.
  • We prefer candidates who can be available for meetings within the window of 9 AM to 4 PM EDT, though this can be discussed.
  • We may be able to sponsor visas for some candidates to work in the US, depending on individual circumstances.

Application process

  • Fill out this application form (10 to 20 mins) by April 4th (or recommend us someone)
  • Quick initial screening (15 mins)
  • Trial task (1 to 3 hours)
  • Interview with both founders
  • Paid work trial (few days to a week)
  • References and offer

Our culture

Kairos is a new but dynamic nonprofit driven by a strong mission to reduce existential risks from AI. We operate with a scout mindset—pursuing truth over comfort and embracing uncertainty. Our team values purpose over ego, alliance over competition, and maintaining the agility needed to address the urgent challenges posed by advanced AI.

We also like to have fun together. While working on AI safety can sometimes be stressful, we are really passionate and energized by the work we do and believe meaningful work should also be enjoyable. We support each other's wellbeing, celebrate small wins, and maintain a healthy sense of humor. 

If you think you might be a good fit for the role but don’t meet all the qualifications, we strongly encourage you to apply anyway! We care more about you having the right mindset rather than perfectly meeting every requirement.

Additional information

While this role is ideally full-time, we’re open to potential part-time arrangements for particularly good candidates.

We’re also willing to negotiate on certain points for especially promising applicants. This includes the role title or the compensation package.

Kairos is an equal opportunity employer, and all qualified applicants will be considered for this role and will not be discriminated against.

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Agus is one of my favorite people I have ever worked with! Would recommend :) 

Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
In my past year as a grantmaker in the global health and wellbeing (GHW) meta space at Open Philanthropy, I've identified some exciting ideas that could fill existing gaps. While these initiatives have significant potential, they require more active development and support to move forward.  The ideas I think could have the highest impact are:  1. Government placements/secondments in key GHW areas (e.g. international development), and 2. Expanded (ultra) high-net-worth ([U]HNW) advising Each of these ideas needs a very specific type of leadership and/or structure. More accessible options I’m excited about — particularly for students or recent graduates — could involve virtual GHW courses or action-focused student groups.  I can’t commit to supporting any particular project based on these ideas ahead of time, because the likelihood of success would heavily depend on details (including the people leading the project). Still, I thought it would be helpful to articulate a few of the ideas I’ve been considering.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, both on these ideas and any other gaps you see in the space! Introduction I’m Mel, a Senior Program Associate at Open Philanthropy, where I lead grantmaking for the Effective Giving and Careers program[1] (you can read more about the program and our current strategy here). Throughout my time in this role, I’ve encountered great ideas, but have also noticed gaps in the space. This post shares a list of projects I’d like to see pursued, and would potentially want to support. These ideas are drawn from existing efforts in other areas (e.g., projects supported by our GCRCB team), suggestions from conversations and materials I’ve engaged with, and my general intuition. They aren’t meant to be a definitive roadmap, but rather a starting point for discussion. At the moment, I don’t have capacity to more actively explore these ideas and find the right founders for related projects. That may change, but for now, I’m interested in