Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Aaron Gertler 🔸
8 min read 0

35

EA Organization Updates (monthly series)Organization updates
Frontpage

These monthly posts originated as the "Updates" section of the EA Newsletter. Organizations submit their own updates, which we edit for clarity.

You can see previous updates in our repository of past newsletters.

80,000 Hours

This month, Rob Wiblin spoke to Carl Shulman on the common-sense case for existential risk work and its practical implications. He also spoke with Varsha Venugopal on using gossip to help vaccinate every child in India.

Anima International

Anima International published the results of a new survey on Russians’ attitudes towards plant-based alternatives that, among other results, showed a 3-fold increase in consumption in the last 18 months and found that the label “100% plant-based product” is 11 times more attractive compared to “100% vegan product”. You can read more about the study here or see the original in Russian.

Otwarte Klatki in Poland released the results of an investigation on mink farms, including interviews with breeders and farm workers, who discuss the presence of disease on farms. They also worked with the Auchan supermarket chain, which signed an agreement to improve the welfare of chickens raised to supply meat for its private-label products; this is the most important broiler chicken commitment they’ve achieved so far.

Animal Advocacy Careers

Animal Advocacy Careers has launched applications for their free, introductory online course.

AAC ran a study of this online course last year, and the results suggested that participants were more likely than a control group to make career plan changes and find roles that seemed promising for helping animals.

The course walks you through some of the key considerations and research involved in working out which are the most cost-effective strategies for you to help animals. It will also help you identify specific opportunities and plan your next steps. The course takes 1-2 hours per week, spread out over a couple of months. 

If this sounds helpful to you, see details on their website and apply via the link there. Applications are due by 10 November.

Animal Ethics

Animal Ethics has been supporting the postdoc research of Jara Gutiérrez and others over the last few years. Jara and her professor Javier de Miguel recently published an article in the European Journal of Ecology focusing on the effects of wildfires on animals and ways to reduce such harms. The full paper can be openly accessed at Fires in nature: a review of the challenges for wild animals. The abstract of the paper is available on the Animal Ethics website.

Animal Ethics also published The development of sentience in juvenile animals, which includes two short case studies of the type necessary to eventually settle the question about which animals are sentient and at what stage in development an animal develops sentience.

Centre for Effective Altruism

CEA released a series of EA Forum posts summarizing their progress over the last quarter. These include updates from the Events team, Groups team, Online team, and Executive Director.

Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI)

GovAI has now officially relaunched as a nonprofit. Their mission remains the same: to build a global research community, dedicated to helping humanity navigate the transition to a world with advanced AI. However, owing to their new structure, they will also be exploring new ways to expand our impact. 

They are hiring Research Fellows and a Chief of Staff, and taking applications for their 3-month Summer Fellowship Program (apply before January 1st). More info at governance.ai and in the announcement post.

Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER)

CSER announced a call for lightning talks as part of their 2022 conference (apply by 15 November). Talks will be delivered remotely during special sessions on the afternoons (BST) of 19-20 April.

In a new working paper, Jess Whittlestone and Jack Clark present a proposal for improving the regulation of AI by investing in government initiatives to measure and monitor aspects of AI research, deployment, and impacts.

Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh and Toby Ord published a comment on the UK Government's National AI Strategy, welcoming its initiatives and especially the government's commitment to working with researchers to safely advance AI and mitigate catastrophic risks.

CSER published a video of their recent panel on the causes of different existential hazards, the sources of existential risk in the past and present, what could change in the future, and what this means for the world.

Charity Entrepreneurship

Charity Entrepreneurship (CE) has announced the launch of five new EA-aligned charities that, thanks to generous funders (EA Funds, Open Philanthropy, and the CE Seed Network), were provided with $537,000 in grants. The 2021 incubated charities are: 

CE has introduced a quiz that can help you determine whether starting an effective nonprofit might be a good fit for you.

Effective Altruism Funds

The Long-Term Future Fund and the EA Infrastructure Fund are once more calling for applications. Please submit your applications for projects that could address important bottlenecks for the EA community or improve the long-term future! 

They’re especially excited about ambitious ideas that could have a large-scale impact if successful, with specific plans for how you might achieve those successes. Apply now.

Faunalytics 

In the latest edition of their Faunalytics Explains video series, Faunalytics examines a report from the beef industry that can also serve as a tactical guide for advocates. They’ve also updated their research library with several articles on topics related to rethinking food systems, including Aquaculture: The Lesser Of Two Evils?, Technical Outrage: Innovating To Reduce Animal Use, and Towards A Just Food Future: Reimagining Dairy Systems. Additionally, their new blog What Is Animal Law? provides an overview of animal law and how advocates can (and do) employ it in creative ways.

Fish Welfare Initiative

In September, FWI secured its first corporate commitment. Although the scale of the commitment is relatively small (affecting ~500 fish/year), FWI believes it sets an important precedent; as far as they are aware, this is the first corporate commitment ever for farmed fish in India.

Additionally, they are hiring a Communications Lead. If you know any candidates in India who might be a good fit, please share!

Giving What We Can

Giving What We Can released a new guide to talking about effective altruism, effective giving, and Giving What We Can and recorded an interview with one of the co-authors, Geetanjali Basarkod, discussing key concepts and tips.

They also announced their Pledge Drive and Effective Giving Advocacy Challenge for 2021 — by participating, you can help to promote effective giving.

Giving Season is fast approaching, and GWWC would be very happy to help with events related to effective giving (see some event ideas) in collaboration with local, university, industry and workplace groups. Please contact them if you would like help organising an event for the 2021 giving season, or pick a time if you’d like them to give a talk online or help to facilitate a giving game.

Global Catastrophic Risk Institute

GCRI Executive Director Seth Baum contributed to a new paper on “Artificial Intelligence, Systemic Risks, and Sustainability”. AI is increasingly used in agriculture and forestry practices processing large datasets from environmental sensors. However, this creates major risks from cyberattacks, large-scale mis-optimization, and extreme cascading failure modes. 

The paper was led by Victor Galaz, the Deputy Director of the Stockholm Resilience Centre, in conjunction with the Global Systemic Risk group at Princeton.

GiveWell 

GiveWell's number-one priority is increasing the number of opportunities to which it can direct funding. It's seeking Senior Researchers to join its team and fill the most important role needed to achieve this goal. It hopes you'll consider applying or sharing the listing with your network.

Senior Researchers are the intellectual leaders who guide GiveWell's exploration of how it can do the most good. Senior Researchers will be responsible for finding, researching, and ultimately recommending high-impact giving opportunities. As part of a small team, they will be significant contributors to decisions about how hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent with the goal of saving and improving the lives of people living in the lowest-income communities in the world. Remote work is possible. More information is available here. 

GiveWell also shared its initial thoughts on the malaria vaccine that was recently recommended by the World Health Organization.

Happier Lives Institute

The Happier Lives Institute (HLI) published new meta-analyses comparing the cost-effectiveness of cash transfers and psychotherapy in low-income countries in terms of subjective well-being. Their key finding is that StrongMinds is 12 times (95% CI: 4, 24) more cost-effective than GiveDirectly in terms of subjective well-being. This puts it roughly on par with the top deworming charities recommended by GiveWell.

This is the first in-depth charity evaluation to compare poverty alleviation and mental health interventions using the same units (subjective well-being) rather than income and DALYs. The analysis is built upon a much broader evidence base rather than evaluating individual charities in isolation. HLI also used Monte Carlo simulations, rather than point estimates, to account for their uncertainty in their final estimates. 

HLI Director Michael Plant discussed these results, HLI’s broader approach, and a number of other topics, such as EA’s cause prioritisation methodology, on Spencer Greenberg’s Clearer Thinking podcast.

One for the World

One for the World has conducted corporate talks about giving at Microsoft, Blackrock, and Mott MacDonald this month, raising around $6000 so far. They are also launching their Giving Tuesday campaigns in the next month.

Open Philanthropy

Open Philanthropy announced grants including $4M to Dezernat Zukunft to support work on monetary and fiscal policy in Europe, $3.3M to the Global Priorities Institute for general support, $3.3M to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology to support a biosecurity research project, and $3M to Mercy for Animals to support corporate engagement on animal welfare. Open Philanthropy co-CEO Holden Karnofsky also spoke with the New York Times’ Ezra Klein about how to do the most good, why we may be living in the most important century, the merits of worldview diversification, and more. 

Rethink Priorities

Rethink Priorities (RP) welcomed several new employees. 

New members of the Global Health and Development team:

New members of the Animal Welfare team:

RP also published several new EA Forum posts. Principal Research Director David Moss  presented the results concerning geography from the EA Survey 2020; it examined where EAs are located, how the number of EAs in different areas is increasing or decreasing, and explored differences across regional, country, and city divides. Lastly, Researcher Michael Aird gave a presentation on “Nuclear risk research, forecasting, and impact”, of which there is a summary, slides, and a video recording of the Q&A session.

WANBAM

WANBAM released a new blog post: “WANBAM: Successes and challenges from our first two years.” The post summarizes their activities, initial results, and steps they took to mitigate risk. They additionally onboarded their next round of mentees for their fourth round.

Add your own update

If your organization isn't shown here, you can provide an update in a comment.

You can also email me if you'd like to be one of the organizations I ask for updates each month. (I may not accept all such requests. Whether I include an org depends on its size, age, focus, track record, etc.)

35

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from Aaron Gertler 🔸
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
Relevant opportunities
23
Last week to apply for the Futurekind AI Fellowship! (deadline: April 1)
Jay Luong
· · 1m read
0
0
25
Out of This Box: The Last Musical (Written by Humans) - Crowdfunding!
GuyP
· · 7m read
0
0
39
Australians for AI Safety Launches New Election Campaign — Here's How You Can Help
Luke Freeman 🔸
· · 3m read
5
5
View more