Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
CEA Updates (Q3 2021)
by MaxDalton
5 min read 2

89

CommunityCentre for Effective AltruismOrganization updates
Frontpage

For CEA's Q3 update, we're sharing multiple posts on different aspects of our work.

People

At this time one year ago, we had 16 people on our core team. Accounting for confirmed arrivals and departures, we now have 29 people on our core team.

Overall, we think we’ve managed to grow the team rapidly while also raising our bar for new hires.

Role Changes

Nicole Ross is transitioning to the role of manager of the Community Health team. Katie Glass, who was previously the team’s interim manager, is now focused on developing hiring systems and helping to build systems for tracking metrics.

Hires

In Q3, we made the following hires:

We had been planning to hire about five people in Q3. We surpassed this target, but some of our new joiners had already been working with us in a contracting capacity, and are simply increasing their hours or becoming more integrated with the team.

For at least one hiring round, I think we should have communicated more promptly with applicants and given them more detailed feedback. We’ve increased tracking of applicant communications, and email support for hiring managers, to try to ensure prompt responses and substantive feedback for applicants that make it far in our process.

Hiring plans

We’re currently hiring for an Executive Assistant and a Finance Associate. We’re also welcoming general expressions of interest, as well as expressions of interest for a Full Stack Engineer.

Departures

Barry Grimes, Harri Besceli, and Aaron Gertler will transition out of CEA during Q4. Sky Mayhew is transitioning from being a member of the Community Health team to contracting with CEA. Louis Dixon also departed CEA at the end of Q3, replaced in his role as our finance lead by Litawn Gan (as mentioned in a previous update).

Morale

The average morale reported for Q3 was 7.17/10, compared with 7.03/10 in Q2.

Org chart

Team retreat

We ran our first team retreat since the pandemic in late August/September. 16 people came together in a venue near Oxford. The average likelihood to recommend the event was 9.07/10, and attendees thought the event was 7x more valuable than the counterfactual use of their time (geometric mean). Broadly, we think that this helped a lot with onboarding new hires, and that people left the event feeling excited about the impact we can have together.

Operations

The Operations team aims to provide the financial, legal, administrative, grantmaking, logistical, and fundraising support that enables CEA, 80,000 Hours, the Forethought Foundation, EA Funds, the Centre for the Governance of AI and Giving What We Can to run efficiently.

  • Operations Associate hiring: We hired Jonathan Michel to run operations in our Oxford office. Jonathan will start in December.
  • Office refurbishment: The office is now fully up and running. We’re still making small improvements to lighting and catering, but users are happy.
  • Improvements to financial systems:
    • We adjusted our financial year in the USA so that it aligns with the UK entity, which will allow us to present consolidated accounts going forward.
    • Audits were completed for both the UK and the US.
  • Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software: We have completed the discovery phase with our Salesforce developer partner, and they have begun to build the CRM.
    • In Q4, our primary focus will be working with the groups team and group organisers to make sure that the CRM meets their needs; achieving this is fundamentally important for the success of the project.
  • Feedback: We set up a form for continuously gathering feedback on our work (which is shared e.g. in our email signatures).
  • Cybersecurity: We stood up well to penetration testing performed by our consultants, and are making some further improvements based on their feedback.
  • Wiki/staff handbook:
    • We began to build onboarding wikis for the Forethought Foundation and Giving What We Can.
    • We added additional guides to the staff handbook to cover private medical insurance, pensions, and visas.

The Ops team met for their first annual team retreat. The team left feeling more cohesive and well-coordinated on future plans.

Community Health

The Community Health team aims to address key issues related to the EA community that are not the focus of other projects and organizations. This includes scanning for issues that other groups aren’t working on and developing plans for us, or partner organizations, to address them. In the past, this has caused us to work on fostering a healthy culture, improving demographic diversity, mitigating harm from conflict or interpersonal problems in the community, advising community members who are doing media interviews about EA, and supporting and reducing risks in early field-building.

Given the low capacity on the team this quarter, we’ve mostly prioritized hiring and EA brand work.

Staffing

Nicole Ross has taken over management of the Community Health team from Katie Glass, who is transitioning to work on some of CEA’s internal systems.

Julia Wise returned from parental leave in August. Sky Mayhew left CEA, after having handed off her previous responsibilities. We plan for her to act as a consultant for us in the future.

We are open to hiring an excellent generalist who could work across a range of areas. So we plan to replace our current expressions of interest with a single general form.

Catherine Low of the groups team is also providing part-time capacity on community health, supporting group organizers on difficult situations they encounter in their groups.

We gave Isaac Dunn a career development contract to allow them to further develop their skills, while doing some projects for the Community Health team and helping other people within the community building sphere.

Reactive work

We handled:

  • 16+ inquiries or cases regarding media stories about EA
  • 7 concerns around interpersonal problems such as sexual harassment
  • 9 cases where we advised on situations in early field-building (geographical areas or academic/professional fields where EA is just getting established)
  • 6 “organizational health” cases where we advised organizations or projects on conflicts of interest, conflicts between staff, best practices in HR, etc.
  • 9 situations where we advised individuals on situations involving personal or mental health problems
  • 11 other situations where we advised groups, organizations, and individuals on situations like conflicts between staff or group members, online conflicts, and improving diversity, equity, and inclusion

Examples of different types of cases from this quarter:

  • We coordinated and coached spokespeople for a press article about EA and careers.
  • We provided support and advice to two group organizers who were concerned about members struggling with personal/mental health problems.

Proactive projects

We’ve been working with some key stakeholders and advisors to develop a plan for more accurately sharing information about EA and longtermism with the general public.

We have written a research brief outlining key questions within DE&I that we are interested in. Eventually, we would like to find someone to conduct projects in these areas. This project is currently on pause due to a lack of capacity.

89

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Previous:
EA Forum engagement doubled in the last year
14 comments74 karma
Mentioned in
Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Chris Leong19
0
0

Is CEA planning for further growth or is there likely to be a period of consolidation?

Reply
MaxDalton13
0
0

We're planning for slower growth in most areas, to consolidate a bit. But I think there's generally enough important + urgent opportunities that we should continue to try to make strong hires in important areas. This feels like a risk, but overall the highest EV thing to do.

 

Maybe we'll hire about 50-75% as many people in 2022 (so a significantly slower growth rate)? We're still figuring this out though.

Reply
More from MaxDalton
481
Transitioning to an advisory role
MaxDalton
· · 3m read
31
31
157
Progress report on CEA’s search for a new CEO
MaxDalton
· · 9m read
8
8
107
About this handbook
MaxDalton
· · 4m read
19
19
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Relevant opportunities
7
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
0
0
22
Out of This Box: The Last Musical (Written by Humans) - Crowdfunding!
GuyP
· · 7m read
0
0
15
Apply to the Cambridge ERA:AI Fellowship 2025
Harrison 🔸
· · 3m read
0
0
View more