I've seen graduation and commencement speeches for about four different universities. I think every university presents itself as helping its students change the world. Your proposal is to make this even more explicit than it already is.
I don't think jadedness really captures most of what's going on. I think people correctly realize that the world is more complicated and confusing and hard to change than they thought, and full of grey areas they don't understand rather than black and white, good guys and bad guys, etc. But to say that jadedness stopped them from trying to change the world feels off to me; rather, they naively thought it would be easy and simple and then got confused and lost interest when they realized it wasn't.
If they were actually trying to change the world -- if they were actually strongly motivated to make the world a better place, etc. -- the stuff they learn in college wouldn't stop them.
How would you separate the genuine idealists from the virtue signalers?
Hmm. I apologize, I don’t actually know whether idealists and virtue signalers differ in productivity. I think the motivation matters for what someone will put up with on the way to their goals; maybe some problems are easier for virtue signalers to solve.