We are excited to announce a new Request for Proposals (RFP) for effective giving organizations, defined as initiatives devoted to raising funds for highly effective charities.^[1] Through this RFP, we aim to identify and support additional efforts in the effective giving space and streamline the application process for potential grantees.

Motivation

Our Effective Giving and Careers program^[2] has historically supported a variety of effective giving organizations across multiple countries. Examples of current grantees include Giving What We Can, Effektiv Spenden, and Doneer Effectief (you can find other recent grants here). 

Effective giving currently comprises 70% of our portfolio, reflecting its central role in our broader funding strategy. In the past few years, we have been positively surprised by the growth of the effective giving ecosystem: new initiatives have launched worldwide, and existing efforts have successfully channeled substantial funds to promising opportunities.

Based on our internal analysis, we estimate that our current grantees deliver an adjusted return on donations^[3] of up to ~8x, with an overall estimate of ~6x across our effective giving portfolio. We believe that there may be additional organizations poised to generate similar impact that we’re not currently supporting. Through this RFP, we hope to:

1. Invite and encourage new and existing effective giving organizations to apply for funding.
2. Simplify and standardize the application process for both applicants and our internal review team.
3. Better understand the current funding needs and gaps within the effective giving space.

Eligibility

Any organization contributing to raising funds for effective charities is eligible to apply. This includes, but is not limited to:

• Donation platforms (and associated outreach efforts) in their respective countries of operation.
• Organizations advising (U)HNW donors on charitable giving.
• Organizations recruiting pledgers (i.e., those encouraging individuals to pledge a percentage of their income to charity).
• Organizations using matching or multiplier schemes to encourage donations to more effective charities.
• Groups raising awareness of effective giving or funneling new donors to other effective giving organizations. 

Additional considerations

Our current grantees raise funds across a variety of focus areas that align with Open Philanthropy’s strategic priorities (global health and development, animal welfare, global catastrophic risks). Any organization raising funds for those areas is welcome to apply.

Your organization should be able to justify how it can use additional funding in a cost-effective way.

Existing grantees on renewable grants will continue to be assessed for general support on their regular schedule. However, they are welcome to apply for top-up funding if they believe they can utilize additional funds cost-effectively. Any top-up funds awarded through this RFP would be a one-time supplement rather than a permanent increase to future grant renewals.

Funding amount and grant structure

In general, we think unrestricted funding for general operating support can be the most valuable kind of funding, so we expect to provide that by default where possible. That being said, we are open to funding specific projects or needs; also, other factors such as the grantee’s corporate structure may influence how we structure our grant.

We aim to represent at most 50% of operational funding for more established organizations, but are comfortable contributing to a larger percentage of total funding for newer organizations. Please keep that in mind when you apply for funding.

We expect most grants to be for one or two years, and to be non-renewable by default (meaning you would need to apply for funding again, rather than having us continue to provide funding indefinitely).

We don’t have a pre-determined minimum or maximum number of applications we intend to fund. We are keen to support as many promising opportunities as possible. We expect to allocate ~$1M-$2.5M through this RFP, but the actual amount might be lower or higher, and will depend on the strength of the application pool.

Selection criteria and evaluation process

We expect to consider the following key factors in our assessment:

• Track record (if applicable). This will include, but not be limited to, our estimated return on donations
• Strength of the theory of change and plans moving forward
• Scalability and growth potential
• Geographic or strategic fit with our current portfolio

Our application was designed to be comprehensive and provide all of the information we think we will need to assess the candidates. That being said, we may reach out to certain applicants for additional information. We don’t expect this to be the norm, so don’t assume your application was rejected if you don’t hear from us before decisions are announced.

Application logistics

You can apply using this link. If useful, you can refer to this sample application using a mix of mock and real data. Applications are due by April 20th, 2025, at 11:59 pm PT.

We expect to make decisions by late May, and to update every applicant on whether we chose to fund them. Due to the anticipated high number of applications, we won’t be able to provide individualized feedback to organizations we decide not to fund.

If you have any questions regarding eligibility, application requirements, or anything else related to this RFP, please feel free to contact Melanie Basnak at melanie.basnak@openphilanthropy.org.

1. ^{^}

   We recognize that there is some subjectivity in the determination of which charities are effective and that different actors use different methods to determine this, and come up with different recommendations as a result. An example of a charity we would consider effective in the Global Health and Development space is a GiveWell Top Charity.

2. ^{^}

   Formerly called “Effective Altruism (Global Health and Wellbeing).”

3. ^{^}

   We obtain figures for “adjusted money raised” by each organization adjusting the donation numbers by: (1) Effectiveness: our perceived cost-effectiveness of the opportunities the organizations are raising funds for, and (2) Counterfactuality: we attribute credit to the fundraising organizations based on how likely the donors would otherwise have been to donate to high impact charities. We then divide those figures by the organization’s expenditure to obtain the adjusted return on donations.