Hide table of contents

These monthly posts originated as the "Updates" section of the EA Newsletter.

You can also see last month's updates, or a repository of past newsletters.

Organization Updates

80,000 Hours

80,000 Hours mostly focused on COVID-19-related content this month. They've created a collection of pages to help people figure out if they should focus on the pandemic — and if so, how to help out:

  1. Landing page with all of their COVID-related research and other top resources
  2. Good news about COVID-19 (their most viral article in a while)
  3. Essential facts about the virus
  4. How to best crush COVID-19 through work and volunteering
  5. Top donation options
  6. List of 200 specific job vacancies, volunteering opportunities, & funding sources
  7. Podcast on the 12 best policy steps to stop pandemics — including COVID-19
  8. The case for and against attempting suppression
  9. Howie and Rob explain the coronavirus crisis (podcast)
  10. How to reduce catastrophic biological risks more generally

They also released their 2019 annual review.

Animal Charity Evaluators

Animal Charity Evaluators published a blog post addressing the common misconception that they are a watchdog organization. The post outlines the differences between watchdog organizations and evaluators, demonstrating how and why ACE aims to direct resources toward only the most effective animal charities. ACE also recommends their recent remote work roundtable series, which addresses many of the challenges teams may face as they transition to working from home. 

Centre for Effective Altruism

CEA released a video playlist from its recent virtual EA Global conference, as well as a transcript of Paul Christiano’s talk from EA Global: San Francisco 2019 (“Current Work in AI Alignment”).

Effective Altruism Funds published new payout reports from the Animal Welfare and EA Meta funds.

Centre for the Study of Existential Risk

CSER hosted Rachel Bronson, president and CEO of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, for a lecture titled “Why is the Doomsday Clock the closest it has ever been to midnight?” You can see the full video on their website.

CSER received media coverage related to COVID-19 in the Guardian and Newsweek (in addition to CSER’s own update); to “cathedral thinkers” on BBC Radio 4; and to climate change and existential risk in Grist. Additionally, Lord Martin Rees appeared on Sean Carroll’s Mindscape podcast.

Charity Entrepreneurship

Charity Entrepreneurship decided to hold the 2020 Incubation Program in a virtual setting in order to prioritize participants’ safety and support efforts to contain COVID-19. 

If you’re looking for a high-impact career opportunity with an EA entrepreneurial framework, apply here. The deadline for applications has been extended to 21 April, 2020, and the program will take place from 29 June to 28 August, 2020.

CE published a summary of their 2019 research and their plans for 2020, including top charity ideas they’re currently researching in four cause areas: mental health and happiness, animal welfare, health and development policy, and family planning.

They also published a series of articles on entrepreneurship that cover picking a co-founder, working well with your co-founder, strengthening your co-founder relationship, and the impact of charity entrepreneurship on the NGO sector

Faunalytics

Faunalytics published results from their new poll on COVID-19 and animals. The study examines what the U.S. public understands about COVID-19's relationship to animals, support for legislation around animal farming to prevent future outbreaks, and other topics relevant to advocates. The results suggest a strong need for public awareness around how animal farming enabled the pandemic; however, Faunalytics cautions advocates against over-emphasizing this connection in the name of advocacy, as it may produce backlash.

They also summarized several external studies (including “Extreme and Effective Aren’t the Same”) and published a blog post in honor of their 20th anniversary: “20 Ways Faunalytics Has Supported the Animal Protection Movement.” 

Future of Humanity Institute

Following the COVID-19 crisis, FHI staff were asked to give advice at the highest level of government in the U.K. and the Czech Republic. Researchers from the biotechnology team were closely involved in establishing the COVID-19 diagnostic testing in the U.K. community study. Other FHI researchers contributed to the creation of an epidemic forecasting website that models projected disease progression given various levels of government intervention.

Future of Life Institute

The Future of Life Institute released three new podcast episodes this month. The latest episode deals with the COVID-19 crisis and what it can teach us about catastrophic risk and building resilience. The others feature Toby Ord on his new book (The Precipice) and Paul Scharre on lethal autonomous weapons.  

GiveWell

GiveWell is monitoring how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the work of its recommended charities, and is researching potential funding opportunities to address the pandemic directly. You can find more details in this blog post.

GiveWell also announced that they granted discretionary donations in the fourth quarter of 2019 to Malaria Consortium's seasonal malaria chemoprevention program ($11.9 million) and Helen Keller International's vitamin A supplementation program ($1.5 million).

Global Catastrophic Risk Institute

GCRI recently released a statement on the COVID-19 pandemic. While GCRI believes the pandemic is not likely on its own to threaten human survival, it may be the most serious global emergency in decades. GCRI plans to use its expertise in cross-risk analysis to contribute to the outbreak response, and to derive lessons about what we can do to prevent future catastrophes.

The Good Food Institute

GFI’s associate director of science and technology, Dr. Liz Specht, had a new piece published in WIRED: “Modernizing Meat Production Will Help Us Avoid Pandemics.”

GFI also announced the latest awardees of their competitive grant program.

Their COVID-19 statement can be seen here.

The Life You Can Save

Many of The Life You Can Save’s recommended nonprofits are rapidly pivoting to include COVID-19 prevention and response in their work protecting the world’s poorest. For more information, see these updates.

Open Philanthropy

Open Philanthropy announced grants including $33.9M to the Malaria Consortium, $3.5M to 80,000 Hours, $1.9M to Animal Equality, $1.2M to the Georgetown Center for Global Health Science and Security, and $250K to the Center for Global Development. They also announced a contract with Good Judgment Inc. to expand the organization’s efforts to aggregate, publish, and track forecasts about the COVID-19 pandemic. Barron’s Penta highlighted Open Philanthropy’s work on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness before and during the pandemic.  

Rethink Priorities

Rethink Priorities published a list of coronavirus research priorities for the EA community and a summary of how coronavirus is impacting animals.

Wild Animal Initiative

Wild Animal Initiative updated their research agenda and added new members to their scientific advisory panel.

Add your own update

If your organization isn't represented on this list, you're welcome to provide an update in a comment.

You can also email me if you'd like to be included on the list of organizations I ask for updates each month; I can then add any updates you submit to future posts. (I may not accept all such requests; whether I include an org depends on its size, age, focus, track record, etc.)

24

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

March Update from The Humane League

The Humane League published their 2019 Annual Report which details the transformative progress they achieved to spare millions of animals from suffering around the world.

THL continues to invest in global efforts to reduce the suffering of chickens. Last month, THL UK secured Better Chicken Commitments from two companies, including Blue Apple Contract Catering, one of the fastest growing foodservice companies in the country.

To ensure that corporate commitments are meaningful, THL also engages companies with cage-free commitments due in 2020 or earlier to hold them accountable. In response to this outreach, two UK companies reported having completed their cage-free transition for egg-laying hens in March.

The Humane League Labs launched a newsletter highlighting new empirical research in farm animal advocacy. To receive these monthly updates, subscribe to THL Labs’ mailing list.

Additionally, amidst this rapidly changing global landscape, THL’s leadership is developing resources and providing support to communities impacted by this crisis:

  • President David Coman-Hidy published an opinion piece shedding light on the link between zoonotic disease and factory farming.
  • As many people transitioned to temporarily working from home, Executive Vice President Andrea Gunn offered guidance on how to effectively manage a remote workplace.
  • The Humane League is standing with slaughterhouse workers who are demanding basic workplace protections as major chicken producers neglect their employees’ health and safety. Read the blog by Director of Corporate Engagement Taylor Ford.

FHI staff were asked to give advice at the highest level of government in the U.K. and the Czech Republic

Is there more info anywhere on the connection between FHI and the Czech govt?

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Recent opportunities in Community
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read