Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
ASuchy1
0
0

Thanks for sharing this update Stephen, it's been inspiring to see the recent momentum your organisation has had.

Reply
See in context
by Stephen Ouma
2 min read 2

15

Animal welfareAfricaAnnouncements and updatesCorporate animal welfare campaignsOrganization updates
Frontpage

Utunzi Animal Welfare Organization is a registered animal welfare organization dedicated to protecting farm animals from cruelty in Kenya. Through rigorous research, advocacy, and corporate outreach, we are committed to sparing millions of animals in Kenya from unnecessary suffering. Thanks to your continued support, we’ve made significant strides in raising awareness, educating communities, and advocating for humane farming practices across the country.

We are thrilled to share a summary of our key achievements in 2024:

Corporate Outreach Successes

In 2024, we secured three key cage-free commitments in Kenya, including one from a local bakery and two from a 4-star and 5-star hotel. These commitments mark a significant step forward in improving animal welfare standards within the corporate sector. We continue to work hard in engaging local food companies to secure new cage-free commitment wins.

Empowering Farmers for Cage-Free Systems

Our cage-free awareness initiative has been a tremendous success, with field officers actively engaging poultry farmers across Kenya; reaching over 200 small and medium-scale producers with animal welfare messaging. By educating farmers on ethical and sustainable farming practices, we are driving a vital shift toward more humane systems. With your ongoing support, we can expand this initiative and advocate for stronger policies to phase out battery cages.

Inspiring the Next Generation

University and college students play a crucial role in our advocacy efforts. Through our Students’ Animal Welfare Seminars, we have seen tremendous growth in awareness and commitment to animal welfare at institutions such as Egerton University and Eldoret TTI, collectively reaching over 1000 students with detailed animal welfare education. With your help, we can further expand this initiative to inspire even more young advocates for animal rights.

Nationwide Advocacy: Reaching Broader Audiences

Our cage-free campaign workshops, supported by the Open Wing Alliance (OWA), have brought together farmers, veterinarians, government officials, and corporate stakeholders to map out a path to a cage-free future for Kenya. Additionally, our appearances on radio and TV talk shows have allowed us to reach a wider audience, educating the public on the ethical treatment of animals. We held 2 radio talk shows and 2 TV talk shows in total, in different languages thus reaching thousands.

Advancing Research & Knowledge Sharing

Our newly revamped website enhances transparency and accessibility to vital animal welfare research. The growing resource hub now features over five key publications, helping shape informed policies and promoting best practices in animal welfare.

Your Support Makes It All Possible!

None of this would be possible without YOU—our dedicated donors, partners, and advocates. Every contribution enables us to extend our reach, fund educational programs, and ensure that animal welfare continues to be a priority in Kenya. 

Together, we are creating lasting change. Thank you for standing with us. Please check out our website and social media to learn more about the work we do!

15

1
0
1

Reactions

1
0
1
Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Aurelia Adhiambo1
0
0

Great job! I am very proud of your efforts. Keep shining.

Reply
ASuchy1
0
0

Thanks for sharing this update Stephen, it's been inspiring to see the recent momentum your organisation has had.

Reply
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I speak to many entrepreneurial people trying to do a large amount of good by starting a nonprofit organisation. I think this is often an error for four main reasons. 1. Scalability 2. Capital counterfactuals 3. Standards 4. Learning potential 5. Earning to give potential These arguments are most applicable to starting high-growth organisations, such as startups.[1] Scalability There is a lot of capital available for startups, and established mechanisms exist to continue raising funds if the ROI appears high. It seems extremely difficult to operate a nonprofit with a budget of more than $30M per year (e.g., with approximately 150 people), but this is not particularly unusual for for-profit organisations. Capital Counterfactuals I generally believe that value-aligned funders are spending their money reasonably well, while for-profit investors are spending theirs extremely poorly (on altruistic grounds). If you can redirect that funding towards high-altruism value work, you could potentially create a much larger delta between your use of funding and the counterfactual of someone else receiving those funds. You also won’t be reliant on constantly convincing donors to give you money, once you’re generating revenue. Standards Nonprofits have significantly weaker feedback mechanisms compared to for-profits. They are often difficult to evaluate and lack a natural kill function. Few people are going to complain that you provided bad service when it didn’t cost them anything. Most nonprofits are not very ambitious, despite having large moral ambitions. It’s challenging to find talented people willing to accept a substantial pay cut to work with you. For-profits are considerably more likely to create something that people actually want. Learning Potential Most people should be trying to put themselves in a better position to do useful work later on. People often report learning a great deal from working at high-growth companies, building interesting connection
 ·  · 31m read
 · 
James Özden and Sam Glover at Social Change Lab wrote a literature review on protest outcomes[1] as part of a broader investigation[2] on protest effectiveness. The report covers multiple lines of evidence and addresses many relevant questions, but does not say much about the methodological quality of the research. So that's what I'm going to do today. I reviewed the evidence on protest outcomes, focusing only on the highest-quality research, to answer two questions: 1. Do protests work? 2. Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Here's what I found: Do protests work? Highly likely (credence: 90%) in certain contexts, although it's unclear how well the results generalize. [More] Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Yes—the report's core claims are well-supported, although it overstates the strength of some of the evidence. [More] Cross-posted from my website. Introduction This article serves two purposes: First, it analyzes the evidence on protest outcomes. Second, it critically reviews the Social Change Lab literature review. Social Change Lab is not the only group that has reviewed protest effectiveness. I was able to find four literature reviews: 1. Animal Charity Evaluators (2018), Protest Intervention Report. 2. Orazani et al. (2021), Social movement strategy (nonviolent vs. violent) and the garnering of third-party support: A meta-analysis. 3. Social Change Lab – Ozden & Glover (2022), Literature Review: Protest Outcomes. 4. Shuman et al. (2024), When Are Social Protests Effective? The Animal Charity Evaluators review did not include many studies, and did not cite any natural experiments (only one had been published as of 2018). Orazani et al. (2021)[3] is a nice meta-analysis—it finds that when you show people news articles about nonviolent protests, they are more likely to express support for the protesters' cause. But what people say in a lab setting mig
Recent opportunities in Animal welfare
46
Open Phil's Farm Animal Welfare team is hiring a Program Assistant!
LewisBollard
· · 2m read
0
0
36
Two jobs at The Jeremy Coller Centre for Animal Sentience, LSE
J. Birch
· · 1m read
0
0
121
AI Moral Alignment: The Most Important Goal of Our Generation
Ronen Bar
· · 10m read
31
31
View more