Oxygen concentrators are more cost-effective than B-type cylinders, and much more cost-effective than ventilators or D-type cylinders, but there’s a lot more uncertainty around oxygen generators. This is both due to Coleman’s calculations and transport constraints. Even though concentrators are used in less severe cases, they can prevent cases from becoming severe enough to require hospitalization, given serious bed shortages.
Effective Indian charities (or ones that operate more extensively in India) are preferable to international ones, especially since the former operate on larger programs, are less vulnerable to government regulations restricting their actions – see here and here. They could also help reduce transaction costs.
So I’d say GiveIndia’s Oxygen fundraiser is a good bet for broad-based oxygen donations (especially since they’re transparent about their costs), and this fundraiser and this one both look promising for concentrator-specific donations. The latter two fundraisers procure concentrators at slightly higher cost than GiveIndia’s fundraiser does, but you can target your donations at concentrators.
Thanks for your post! I've been worried about missing the opportunity to help but didn't have the time to evaluate which charity to support. Based on your post I donated to GiveIndia. I hope we as a community can look back on this and be proud we acted decisively and fast.
Trying to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 charities in India
This is a repost of something I wrote here: https://gotech.ghost.io/covid19india - this forum asked the same question as I did and I would welcome help from the rest of the community in building out what is a quick first draft.
Beyond oxygen, it was difficult to get good data on what key supply chain shortages actually are. Is shipping oxygen cylinders directly cost effective? How about donating money locally to buy/produce vaccines?
In the meantime, I looked through some charities and tried to assess their efforts. I ended up looking at what activities they were carrying out, how much detail they provided about their activities, the quality of any financial reporting/quality reporting processes they seemed to have and how easy it seemed to be to access financial breakdowns. The exercise became more of a "gut feel" analysis than I would have liked but was still tremendously useful - I'm open to suggested edits/additions, and will touch on some of the further research I would have liked to have done at the end.
PATH: a Seattle based charity - has an India Oxygen Drive. https://www.path.org/p/india-medical-oxygen/. Their site has good, clear financial reporting and decent rating on charity navigator. However if you donate to them, it's not entirely clear where the money will go - their website states that "Donations to PATH are allocated to a variety of programs and projects, depending on current needs and emerging health issues." Overall rating:7/10
International Association for Human Values "Help India Breathe Again": https://www.iahv.org/in-en/donate/ Strange charity name but they seem to be doing good work, having partnered with famous spiritual leader Ravi Shankar's Art of Living Foundation. The website outlines a detailed plan for oxygen concentrators and ration kits, and they post photos of their distributions on Facebook. They make it pretty clear that: "all proceeds will be used in procuring and distributing ration kits" and elsewhere that "100% of your contributions will be utilized for the COVID relief work". Charity Navigator gave them a decent rating (under their old rating system) and their website seems to back this up. Their financials page also seems pretty good with independent auditor reports that have detailed breakdowns (e.g. salary vs travel expenses vs advertisement). However the financials only seem to show up to 2018. Overall rating: 7.5/10.
IAHV's Facebook page
SEWA International USA: https://www.sewausa.org/Covid-19-India-FAQs They are shipping oxygen concentrators, ventilators and other equipment. They have specific reports on how many oxygen concentrators have been sent (400), with many more ordered. They advertise a 4-star rating from Charity Navigator. They publish the independent auditor reports on the financials section of their website and appear to only spend a small proportion of funds on fundraising and adminstrative expenses. Overall rating: 7.5/10
Project HOPE:https://www.projecthope.org/project-hope-responding-to-covid-19-surge-in-india/04/2021/ They are responding by helping to procure PPE, oxygen supplies, ICU equipment, ventilators etc. They proudly advertise that they meet various charity accountability standards, and are ranked by Charity Navigator, BBB and others. Their financials section publishes accounts, independent audits and annual reports and it looks like they spend less than 15% on administration/marketing. I especially like that they run a health policy journal (but found surprisingly little estimation of the impact of their projects last year, even in their annual report). Overall rating: 8/10
Figuring out how effective these charity efforts are from their website alone is difficult. I don't of course expect anyone to be carrying out a detailed impact analysis given how acute the COVID situation in India is, but thought that evidence of detailed policy evaluation, thorough reporting and easy-to-access data on previous projects would all point to rigorous processes in place. The Against Malaria Foundation's website is a great example of the sort of quality that's possible, with detailed financial tables easily accessible from their homepage, a published decision making framework and individual distribution level reporting (though perhaps focusing on the single task of donating bed nets makes it easier).
What I found was that there doesn't seem to be a great deal to separate the charities with all of them seeming to do decent work. Most make their tax reporting easy to find and seem to keep the proportion of money allocated to "administration" and "marketing" (versus actual programs) low. However, there was definitely some variability in the quality and detail of financial reporting, the use of independent audit, as well as the ease with which they made this available. Proxy markers I know, but still useful for decision making.
Some important things that I haven't been able to look at yet are:
Again, more specifics about current needs (what would be most useful right now?)
Some further confirmation of Jeff Coleman's calculations: what saves more lives per $, an oxygen concentrator, a ventilator or an oxygen cylinder? A donation in cash or shipping equipment from abroad? Which charities have the best handle on this? Does equipment need to be sent from the US, or are there charities that can buy and ship quickly from other countries?
Location specifics (e.g. which states/cities is it most important to donate to?)
The financials of each charity in any detail (e.g. are they overspending on rent/salaries)
For now however, I have enough information to know where I'm going to donate this week...
This is a crosspost from the new Animal Welfare Alignment Newsletter by Anima International. You can subscribe on Substack if you are interested in following these efforts. Audio reading also available on Substack.
The goals of this post are to:
1. Raise a question I see as crucially important to the goal of aligning AI to animal welfare...
“How long have you been v*g*n?”
This is one of the most common icebreakers at animal protection events. It’s a baseline assumption, and it mostly holds true: if you’re out advocating for animals not to be tortured or abused, realistically these days you are v**n, or close. And it makes for good conversation. It seems fairly safe to assume when you meet strangers.
But this assumption is hurting the movement in a way which we don’t always notice: someone new comes into the sp...
AI Use Note: Main body text entirely human written. Claude (Opus 4.8) helped develop models of animal life histories in the appendix.
Cross-posted from Good Structures.
Executive Summary
* Animal advocates sometimes make claims like “there are X of this animal...
My guesses at the moment are that:
So I’d say GiveIndia’s Oxygen fundraiser is a good bet for broad-based oxygen donations (especially since they’re transparent about their costs), and this fundraiser and this one both look promising for concentrator-specific donations. The latter two fundraisers procure concentrators at slightly higher cost than GiveIndia’s fundraiser does, but you can target your donations at concentrators.
Here are GiveIndia’s estimates of its costs: