I'm not very familiar with the Center for Data Innovation, thank you for pointing this out!I included their response as its author is familiar with EA and well reasoned. I also felt it would be healthy to include a perspective and set of concerns vastly different from my own, as the post is already biased by my choice of focus.
That being said I haven't gotten the best impression by some of the Center for Data Innovation's research. As far as I can tell their widely cited analysis which projects the act to cost €31 billion has flaw in its methodology which results in the estimate turning out much higher. In their defense, their cost-analysis is also conservative in other ways, leading to a lower number than what might be reasonable.
Sorry I should have said "monitoring AI progress in Europe as a whole" and even then I think it might be misleading.One of the three central tasks of the AI board is to 'coordinate and contribute to guidance and analysis by the Commission and the national supervisory authorities and other competent authorities on emerging issues across the internal market with regard to matters covered by this Regulation;'
For example, if a high-risk AI system is compliant but still poses a risk the provider is required to immediately inform the AI Board. The national supervisory authorities must also regularly report back to the AI Board about the results of their market surveillance and more.So the AI Board both gets the mandate and the information to monitor how AI progresses in the EU. And they have to do so to carry out their task effectively even if it's not directly stated anywhere that they are required to do so.I hope this clears it up, I'm happy that you found the post useful!
At first glance, this strikes me as a very exciting opportunity!I think it's difficult to find a degree that is more relevant to the EA community than this is. That said, there are degrees that are more relevant for specific cause areas. For example, an Msc. in Computer Science will probably prepare you better for work on direct AI alignment than this degree would.I would advise you to think about what cause areas you could become excited to pursue, and how this degree will help you do so. I imagine it would be a great fit for quite a few!
Is the offer available for non-English speaking countries?There's a Danish program for talented youths that would likely be interested in this if I shared it with them.
I think its perfectly fine for EA orgs to be in competition for talent, if anything it's a good thing.It should not be 80k's job to decide the counterfactuals from poaching great people from other organizations. That should be solely the job of the people they poach.Presumably the people they hire do a thorough evaluation of the harm they'll cause by leaving their former organization and the good they'll do by joining a new one. If the calculation doesn't look net positive they are not going to do it.
I think we should be open to the idea that our current societal structures are far from perfect. It's a good habit to question the premises of our society that are typically taken for granted.I think you can make a case for it if you truly think capitalism is the root of all evil. I stubbed my toe earlier today and I must admit I'm not sure how to pin that on capitalism. Capitalism certainly is the root of some evil, but I think it's a stretch to say it's the root of all evil.
Prioritizing top universities makes perfect sense to me. I would argue we should consider directly working to establish EA communities at highly ranked universities that currently have none.The choice of countries and cities makes much less sense to me.My guess would be that the success of a given EA community is highly dependent on founder effects. The groups doing very well already have capable people with a keen sense on how to grow their community. If they didn't they wouldn't have gotten big in the first place.Why focus most of your time on these communities? It seems to me their organizers are perfectly capable and will do just fine as long as they are provided adequate funding.Wouldn't it make more sense to be spending your time helping smaller communities grow? Cities that immediately spring to mind are:1. Seattle2. Austin3. Warsaw4. Moscow5. CopenhagenThey are all populous cities with highly educated populations. I don't have any a priori reason to believe that Austin and Warsaw has much less 'ea-potential' than Stockholm and Prague. It seems to me that many places have potential to grow as big as the communities you're focusing on, but for some reason have not.Shouldn't it be higher among CEA's priorities to figure out how to help communities like these?
Thanks for your post! I've been worried about missing the opportunity to help but didn't have the time to evaluate which charity to support. Based on your post I donated to GiveIndia. I hope we as a community can look back on this and be proud we acted decisively and fast.
The new oxford malaria vaccine is looking very promising!It seems to me that we should be able to produce a cost-effectiveness analysis and have a plan prepared for how to distribute the vaccine if it is approved and cost effective, but I'm struggling to find anything like this.What would be your response to a new vaccine that is effective and cheap to distribute?
What makes you believe the market for labor isn't monopsonistic?To me it seems pretty plausible that the labor market is full of minor monopsonies. For example I prefer to work at a store closer rather than farther away from me which would give the local store some market power on my labor.Or maybe I prefer to work at the only coffee place in my town as opposed to the only tea place due to my interest coffee.