This is a special post for quick takes by deniz. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
I am relatively new to the community and am still getting acquainted with the shared knowledge and resources.
I have been wondering what the prevailing thoughts are regarding growing the EA community or growing the use of EA style thought frameworks. The latter is a bit imprecise, but, at a glance, it appears to me that having more organizations and media outlets communicate in a more impact-aware way may have a very high expected value.
What are people's thoughts on this problem? It likely fits into a meta-category of EA work, but lately I have been feeling that EA messaging and spread is an underserved area for improvement. It's possible I'm simply unaware of some difficulties or existing related efforts.
Both of these are generally thought to be good things, though personally I'd expect growing the movement would be easier than spreading EA-style thought (partially because the EA community is small, while the outside world is big, so it's probably much easier to have a substantial relative impact in growing the community than in, for instance, getting the outside world to be more impact-aware, though there are other considerations). One caveat, though, is that rash attempts to grow the movement have the potential to be counterproductive.
Thank you very much for the welcome and for your thoughts!
That is a good point regarding the growth potential of the community itself, and certainly the quality of any growth would need to be a primary consideration.
My only counter-consideration to your point is that the bar to overcome is lower when convincing someone to adopt some aspect of EA-style methodology when compared to becoming a full EA community member. That being said, it certainly seems more concrete and easier to fathom how to grow the community, and less so for how to “spread EA style thinking”.
I think of GiveWell and 80,000 Hours as good examples of organizations that in their own way promote EA principles. Providing resources and tools for consumers seems to me a good way to increase reach, and perhaps there are areas that have not already been covered by existing EA-adjacent organizations.
I am relatively new to the community and am still getting acquainted with the shared knowledge and resources.
I have been wondering what the prevailing thoughts are regarding growing the EA community or growing the use of EA style thought frameworks. The latter is a bit imprecise, but, at a glance, it appears to me that having more organizations and media outlets communicate in a more impact-aware way may have a very high expected value.
What are people's thoughts on this problem? It likely fits into a meta-category of EA work, but lately I have been feeling that EA messaging and spread is an underserved area for improvement. It's possible I'm simply unaware of some difficulties or existing related efforts.
Welcome to the community!
Both of these are generally thought to be good things, though personally I'd expect growing the movement would be easier than spreading EA-style thought (partially because the EA community is small, while the outside world is big, so it's probably much easier to have a substantial relative impact in growing the community than in, for instance, getting the outside world to be more impact-aware, though there are other considerations). One caveat, though, is that rash attempts to grow the movement have the potential to be counterproductive.
Thank you very much for the welcome and for your thoughts!
That is a good point regarding the growth potential of the community itself, and certainly the quality of any growth would need to be a primary consideration.
My only counter-consideration to your point is that the bar to overcome is lower when convincing someone to adopt some aspect of EA-style methodology when compared to becoming a full EA community member. That being said, it certainly seems more concrete and easier to fathom how to grow the community, and less so for how to “spread EA style thinking”.
I think of GiveWell and 80,000 Hours as good examples of organizations that in their own way promote EA principles. Providing resources and tools for consumers seems to me a good way to increase reach, and perhaps there are areas that have not already been covered by existing EA-adjacent organizations.