Hide table of contents

TL;DR

High-impact organisations can already use our Candidate Directory to find new board members. We are now offering free support to design and deliver fair, fast and smart hiring processes to help these same organisations identify and select people who can contribute to the good governance of their organisation.

The problem as we see it

Identifying and selecting the right people to serve as board members is critical for the Good Governance of mission-driven organisations.

Among other things[1], effective boards should:

  • be made up of individuals with the time, skills and experience to support organisations in delivering on their long-term purpose and short- to medium-term strategy
  • demonstrate a diversity of thought, experience and perspective
  • be appropriately separate from an organisation’s staff and other key stakeholders[2]
  • represent and role model core values and principles that guide an organisation’s work

While EA organisations do a good job of ensuring that individuals are selected for their alignment with some core values and principles, it is probably uncontroversial to suggest that (too) many organisations would identify with one or more of the following[3]:

  • Board members who are closely connected to the organisation, either through personal relationships with the executive team or because they are/represent an important funder/stakeholders
  • A majority of board members with roughly similar backgrounds or experiences (eg where they are from, their education and work experience etc)
  • Board members who don't have enough time to contribute, or who regularly miss meetings
  • Board members who don't (either because they can't or won't) take sufficient time to understand what the organisation does and/or how it does it
  • Board members whose skills and experiences don't obviously serve the organisation
  • Board members (or an entire board!) that rarely disagree(s) with or challenge(s) each other and/or the executive team on important, big-picture decisions[4]

It is also the case that many organisations/projects are operating without a board entirely. This is perhaps a separate post but I'd argue that most EA organisations and projects should have a board, and that these boards should have the right people on them. 

That being said, setting up a board and getting the right people on it is difficult - it's time consuming, it's not clear who should be responsible[5], it's not clear how to do it..... 

 

How we can help

This is where The Good Governance Project comes in! We already host a directory of candidates looking for board positions at high-impact nonprofits. Now, we are offering free support  to any EA organisation interested in setting up a new board of trustees, or recruiting people to an existing board. 

If you don’t know where to start with recruiting new board members, don’t have the capacity or bandwidth to make progress on this, or are setting up a new board from scratch...

Get In Touch!

 

What our support might look like

We're open to helping in any way that supports you to identify and select the right people. However, we expect that our work falls into one of the following areas:

  • Assessing Your Needs
    • Considering your long-term mission (or purpose) and short- to medium-term plan (strategy)
    • Identifying the skills and experiences needed on the board
  • Designing Your Approach
    • Developing an approach that supports you to effectively and fairly identify and select the right people
  • Delivering Your Process
    • Creating the tools and processes that support the recruitment process
    • Creating candidate assessment tasks
  • Reviewing Candidates
    • Screening applications
    • Scoring candidate responses
    • Supporting interviews
  • Administration
    • Responding to enquiries from potential applicants
    • Setting up and administrating an applicant tracking system (ATS) for receiving and reviewing applications
    • Scheduling assessments and organising interviews
  • Supporting Decision-Making
    • Supporting calibration between assessors
    • Facilitating key decisions (eg who to progress at each stage of assessment and who to appoint)

If you've got any questions, then please leave a comment or otherwise get in touch :)

  1. ^

    This is a very rough draft of a overall framework for good governance. Based on feedback (and my own process of letting things percolate a while) there are a number of updates I need to make to it. However, I'm always open to thoughts and feedback from others!

  2. ^

    I find it important to make a distinction here - I don't suggest that individual board members must be separate from an organisation's staff and key stakeholders, but that the board as a whole should be. This can be achieved by ensuring individuals are appropriately separate, by ensuring individuals declare conflicts of interest when it is important to do so, or by being thoughtful about how decisions are made

  3. ^

    I have no real data to back this up but anecdotally, having worked with several dozen mission-driven teams, I can think of only a handful of orgs that wouldn't identify with at least one of these issues

  1. ^

    Not to be confused with the all-too-common board or board member that challenges on minutiae and/or gets too involved in operational decisions

  2. ^

    Probably not the executive team as there's a conflict of interest there, probably not the existing board because they don't have time...

Show all footnotes

18

1
0

Reactions

1
0

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I joined the audit committee of the Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative, who found me through the EA Good Governance Project. As someone who wants to get more experience serving on boards, I am looking for opportunities, but the EA Good Governance Project made it possible! 


I'd encourage people interested in serving on boards to join as a candidate and for organizations to use it as a tool for finding board members.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
I wrote this to try to explain the key thing going on with AI right now to a broader audience. Feedback welcome. Most people think of AI as a pattern-matching chatbot – good at writing emails, terrible at real thinking. They've missed something huge. In 2024, while many declared AI was reaching a plateau, it was actually entering a new paradigm: learning to reason using reinforcement learning. This approach isn’t limited by data, so could deliver beyond-human capabilities in coding and scientific reasoning within two years. Here's a simple introduction to how it works, and why it's the most important development that most people have missed. The new paradigm: reinforcement learning People sometimes say “chatGPT is just next token prediction on the internet”. But that’s never been quite true. Raw next token prediction produces outputs that are regularly crazy. GPT only became useful with the addition of what’s called “reinforcement learning from human feedback” (RLHF): 1. The model produces outputs 2. Humans rate those outputs for helpfulness 3. The model is adjusted in a way expected to get a higher rating A model that’s under RLHF hasn’t been trained only to predict next tokens, it’s been trained to produce whatever output is most helpful to human raters. Think of the initial large language model (LLM) as containing a foundation of knowledge and concepts. Reinforcement learning is what enables that structure to be turned to a specific end. Now AI companies are using reinforcement learning in a powerful new way – training models to reason step-by-step: 1. Show the model a problem like a math puzzle. 2. Ask it to produce a chain of reasoning to solve the problem (“chain of thought”).[1] 3. If the answer is correct, adjust the model to be more like that (“reinforcement”).[2] 4. Repeat thousands of times. Before 2023 this didn’t seem to work. If each step of reasoning is too unreliable, then the chains quickly go wrong. Without getting close to co
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
My name is Keyvan, and I lead Anima International’s work in France. Our organization went through a major transformation in 2024. I want to share that journey with you. Anima International in France used to be known as Assiettes Végétales (‘Plant-Based Plates’). We focused entirely on introducing and promoting vegetarian and plant-based meals in collective catering. Today, as Anima, our mission is to put an end to the use of cages for laying hens. These changes come after a thorough evaluation of our previous campaign, assessing 94 potential new interventions, making several difficult choices, and navigating emotional struggles. We hope that by sharing our experience, we can help others who find themselves in similar situations. So let me walk you through how the past twelve months have unfolded for us.  The French team Act One: What we did as Assiettes Végétales Since 2018, we worked with the local authorities of cities, counties, regions, and universities across France to develop vegetarian meals in their collective catering services. If you don’t know much about France, this intervention may feel odd to you. But here, the collective catering sector feeds a huge number of people and produces an enormous quantity of meals. Two out of three children, more than seven million in total, eat at a school canteen at least once a week. Overall, more than three billion meals are served each year in collective catering. We knew that by influencing practices in this sector, we could reach a massive number of people. However, this work was not easy. France has a strong culinary heritage deeply rooted in animal-based products. Meat and fish-based meals remain the standard in collective catering and school canteens. It is effectively mandatory to serve a dairy product every day in school canteens. To be a certified chef, you have to complete special training and until recently, such training didn’t include a single vegetarian dish among the essential recipes to master. De
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
 The Life You Can Save, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting extreme poverty, and Founders Pledge, a global nonprofit empowering entrepreneurs to do the most good possible with their charitable giving, have announced today the formation of their Rapid Response Fund. In the face of imminent federal funding cuts, the Fund will ensure that some of the world's highest-impact charities and programs can continue to function. Affected organizations include those offering critical interventions, particularly in basic health services, maternal and child health, infectious disease control, mental health, domestic violence, and organized crime.