Hide table of contents

TLDR: US Christian giving amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars per year. Much of it is far less effective than it could be. EA for Christians (EACH) is tackling this, but more can be done. Below is a list of projects we have worked on so far related to effective giving. If this excites you, or you'd like to start a new project or incubate a charity improving effectiveness among Christians/Christian orgs, we'd love to partner with or support you.


Context: I recently had a chat with someone at Giving What We Can who thought that people may be less keen to start a new project in the effective giving & Christianity space because they assume Effective Altruism for Christians has already tried it. But there's a lot we haven't tried (or things we have tried that we might not be best at). For more context, EACH is a global community of 500+ Christians in EA. I'm the FT director and I work with numerous excellent and committed PT staff. 


Effective-giving related Projects: In no particular order, here's a short list of most of the effective giving projects we've undertaken over the last 3-5 years (while I've worked here). Some of these have cross-over with careers, EA community building, etc.

Projects we're giving proactive attention to (at least 1-2+ staff hours a week)  are marked with (✔)

Projects we're giving even more attention to (2+ staff hours a week) are marked with (✔+) 

  1.  1-on-1s with Christians interested in effective giving (we've done 500+ to-date; most of our 1-on-1s at least touch on effective giving) (✔+)
  2. General EA Christian conferences, retreats, and meetups  (✔+)
  3. A conference organizing Christian impact professionals from large Christian development charities (E.g. Compassion, Hope, etc.) (✔) to discuss EA . We did one in 2023. A video on this here. DM me for a report on how this went. (✔)
  4. Report about M&E practices at Christian development charities. We have one forthcoming this spring. (✔)
  5. Published book about effective altruism and surprising ways to have a large impact with one's life. We have one forthcoming in 2025 (✔+)
  6. A Christian Campaign for (mostly Givewell) effective charities (raised $380,000+) (✔)
  7. Talks at churches on effectiveness and radical generosity.
  8. Uni internships doing outreach related to radical and effective generosity (We've had 8 interns for this and also a partnership with One-For-The-World)
  9. Articles about EA and Christianity, especially effective Christian charity (We've published dozens of blogs (✔+)
  10. A podcast heavily featuring Christians who earn-to-give or work at effective charities. We've done one with 10+ episodes (✔+)
  11. 3+ videos with Christian youtubers about effective altruism (especially effective giving)
  12. Social meetups at cities across US coastal cities and London (we've done a couple dozen) (✔+)
  13. Online discussions on EA and Christian themes (we've done 140, about 30 about effective giving topics with an avg. 10 people at each; youtube videos here) (✔)
  14. A 5-minute animated video describing effective altruism (and effective giving) from a Christian perspective. See here
  15. Academic workshops on effective giving. We've done some on EA themes, with a few talks on generosity. This year we have one on longtermism. (✔)
  16. Online talks on effective giving themes. We've done  5-10 (✔)
  17. M&E advising from Christian EA development professionals to Christian development charities. We're starting a pro bono offering in spring 2024 (✔)
  18. A report on plausibly highest-impact Christian poverty charities. We have done some related work in this report
  19. An Intro-course to EA/Effective giving for Christians. See our 4-week Intro course (✔)
  20. Career outreach that promotes effective giving as a primary way to have an impactful career.  We're prioritising this via our Career advisory (✔+)
  21. A directory of Christians who give effectively. Relatedly, we have a directory of 250+ Christians who are in the EA movement / broadly agree with the basic ideas behind EA.

    Thoughts on the above:
  • Some projects above we've discontinued / no longer prioritize.
  • Some projects we find valuable but are irregular or otherwise don't require continued engagement (e.g. directory).
  • Some projects above we would tackle more if we had more talent or resources.

    Here are related projects we haven't tried but that are maybe high in expected value:
  1. Outreach to HNWI Christians to give more effectively
  2. Influencing wealthy Christian institutions to incorporate effectiveness
  3. Influencing Christian foundations to incorporate effectiveness
  4. Talking about effective giving with very widely-followed Christian thought leaders (e.g. NT Wright, John Piper, Allister McGrath, David Platt, Francis Chan etc.) e.g. on our podcast
  5. Promoting Unconditional Cash Transfers (e.g. GiveDirectly) for the Church of England's $1 billion reparations program
  6. Promoting more effective interventions (e.g. malaria net programs) within Christian development charities that have done so/are doing so (e.g. Episcopal Relief and Development, Catholic Relief Services, respectively)
  7. Others...

    I'd like to produce a write-up with what's worked more or less. We have our theory of change and output stats here. For quick access to all EA Christian materials, see our linktree.

    Again, if you're interested in doing any of these, I'd be happy to support you / share resources or learnings! Please feel free to book a chat with me anytime here.
     

View insights

0 post reach

 

 

Like

 

 

Comment

 

Send


 

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thanks so much for writing this up! 

Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
In my past year as a grantmaker in the global health and wellbeing (GHW) meta space at Open Philanthropy, I've identified some exciting ideas that could fill existing gaps. While these initiatives have significant potential, they require more active development and support to move forward.  The ideas I think could have the highest impact are:  1. Government placements/secondments in key GHW areas (e.g. international development), and 2. Expanded (ultra) high-net-worth ([U]HNW) advising Each of these ideas needs a very specific type of leadership and/or structure. More accessible options I’m excited about — particularly for students or recent graduates — could involve virtual GHW courses or action-focused student groups.  I can’t commit to supporting any particular project based on these ideas ahead of time, because the likelihood of success would heavily depend on details (including the people leading the project). Still, I thought it would be helpful to articulate a few of the ideas I’ve been considering.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, both on these ideas and any other gaps you see in the space! Introduction I’m Mel, a Senior Program Associate at Open Philanthropy, where I lead grantmaking for the Effective Giving and Careers program[1] (you can read more about the program and our current strategy here). Throughout my time in this role, I’ve encountered great ideas, but have also noticed gaps in the space. This post shares a list of projects I’d like to see pursued, and would potentially want to support. These ideas are drawn from existing efforts in other areas (e.g., projects supported by our GCRCB team), suggestions from conversations and materials I’ve engaged with, and my general intuition. They aren’t meant to be a definitive roadmap, but rather a starting point for discussion. At the moment, I don’t have capacity to more actively explore these ideas and find the right founders for related projects. That may change, but for now, I’m interested in
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism