Hide table of contents

Summary

We are hiring for an Executive Director and an EU Tech Policy Lead to launch Talos Institute[1], a new organisation focused on EU AI policy careers. 

Talos is spinning out of Training for Good and will launch in 2024 with the EU Tech Policy Fellowship as its flagship programme. We envision Talos expanding its activities and quickly growing into a key organisation in the AI governance landscape.

Apply here by December 27th.

Key Details

  • Closing: 27 December, 11:59PM GMT
  • Start date: We would ideally like a candidate to begin as soon as possible after receiving an offer, but we are willing to wait if the best candidate can only start later. Ability to attend our upcoming Brussels Summit (February 26th - March 1st) would also be beneficial, though not required.
  • Hours: 40/week (flexible)
  • Location: Brussels (preferred) / Remote
  • Compensation:
    • Executive Director: €70,000 - €90,000. We are committed to attracting top talent and are willing to offer a higher salary for the right candidate.
    • EU Tech Policy Lead: €55,000 - €75,000. We are committed to attracting top talent and are willing to offer a higher salary for the right candidate.
  • How to apply: Please fill in this short application form
  • Contact: cillian@trainingforgood.com

About Talos Institute

EU Tech Policy Fellowship

The EU Tech Policy Fellowship is Talos Institute’s flagship programme. It is a 7-month programme enabling ambitious graduates to launch European policy careers reducing risks from artificial intelligence. From 2024, it will run twice per year. It includes:

  • 8-week training that explores the intricacies of AI governance in Europe
  • A week-long policymaking summit in Brussels to connect with others working in the space
  • 6-month placement at a prominent think tank working on AI policy (e.g. The Centre for European Policy Studies, The Future Society)

Success to date

The EU Tech Policy Fellowship appears to have had a significant impact to date. Since 2021, we’ve supported ~30 EU Tech Policy Fellows and successfully transitioned a significant number to work on AI governance in Europe. For example:

We’re conducting an external evaluation and expect to publish the results in early 2024. Initial indicators suggest that the programme has been highly effective to date. As a result, we have decided to double the programme’s size by running two cohorts per year. We now expect to support 30+ fellows in 2024 alone.

Future directions

We can imagine Talos Institute growing in a number of ways. Future activities could include things like:

  • Creating career advice resources tailored to careers in European policy (especially for those interested in AI & biosecurity careers). Similar to what Horizon has done in the US.
  • Community-building activities for those working in AI Governance in Europe (eg. retreats to facilitate connections, help create shared priorities, identify needs in the space, and incubate new projects).
  • Hosting events in Brussels educating established policy makers on risks from advanced AI
  • Activities that help grow the number of people interested in considering policy careers focused on risks from advanced AI, e.g. workshops like this 
  • Expanding beyond AI governance to run similar placement programmes for other problems in Europe (e.g. biosecurity).
  • Establishing the organisation as a credible think tank in Europe. |This would involve hiring researchers in-house and producing useful object-level output.
  • Producing media and content related to AI governance in EU

It’s unclear how promising any of the above activities would be. Their inclusion here is not necessarily an endorsement. Instead, we suspect that an incoming Executive Director might explore some of these options, perhaps alongside other activities that are not listed above.

Funding

We are primarily funded by Open Philanthropy at present and have runway for this project until ~Dec 2024. We also have connections to European philanthropists who may provide funding in the future. We expect these funders would be excited to support a high-calibre team to launch this organisation.

Executive Director

Responsibilities

As Executive Director, you will lead the Talos Institute and have full responsibility for its success. You will found the organisation, developing a wider vision for Talos beyond the existing EU Tech Policy Fellowship.
 

This role offers an opportunity for a skilled individual to have an outsized impact on the trajectory of AI governance in Europe. We expect that, for the right candidate, this role provides an exceptionally high impact opportunity to make progress on AI risk by increasing the number of talented individuals working directly in the space.


As Executive Director, your responsibilities will include:

  • Strategy: Set the strategy of Talos Institute, including what programmes to launch, which impact metrics to target, and how to grow the impact of the EU Tech Policy Fellowship.
  • Leadership: You’ll build a team to execute on your vision and inspire them to be ambitious in striving for impact. Hiring, retaining, and firing staff will be your responsibility.
  • Execution: Ensuring the team remains highly organised and functional while ensuring the basic financial and operational needs of the organisation are met.
  • Stakeholder management: Managing relationships with key donors, placement organisations, experts and other stakeholders.
  • Everything: Addressing the most important & thorny issues that come up anywhere in the organisation.

What we are looking for

You might be a particularly good fit for this role if you have

  • The skills to develop a clear strategy for the organisation. We believe that organisations excel when the leader has a strong vision and is empowered to execute on it. We’ll provide lots of opportunities to gain context and meet stakeholders as you develop a strategy in the first weeks and months.
  • Excellent people management skills. We are looking for someone who is good at hiring, delegating, and empowering staff, so that you can grow the organisation successfully. We want you to be able to manage any key stakeholders, and to be resilient to stress.
  • Strong project management skills. We are looking for someone with experience managing complex projects with multiple stakeholders. You should feel confident with goal-tracking, system-building, and keeping teams on track to meet ambitious deadlines.
  • Leadership ability & good judgement. We are looking for someone who will pursue the mission they create for the organisation energetically and with high integrity. You can give and receive feedback constructively and non-confrontationally. You remain open to pushback while developing your own views.
  • A strong understanding of AI governance. You are familiar with the content in the AI Safety Fundamentals Governance Course and likely prioritise reducing risks from advanced AI within your career.

It’s a bonus but not required to have:

  • A strong understanding of European AI governance
  • Past experience in management or non-profit entrepreneurship.
  • Past experience in US/UK/EU policymaking or government work, and/or past experience working on AI governance at a company contributing to the cutting edge of AI R&D.
  • A strong network of contacts within the AI governance and policy field. 
  • A graduate degree.
  • Ability to attend our upcoming Brussels Summit (February 26th - March 1st). A full-time start date could be later than this.

We encourage speculative applications; we expect many strong candidates will not meet all of the criteria listed here.

EU Tech Policy Lead

Responsibilities

As EU Tech Policy Lead, you'll take responsibility for running our flagship EU Tech Policy Fellowship. You’ll work closely with our Executive Director to launch the Talos Institute and reduce risks from advanced AI by transitioning talented individuals into policy careers in Europe.

This role offers exceptional learning and professional development with the ability to rapidly gain skills, assume responsibility, and have an outsized impact developing the next generation of AI policy leaders. We expect that, for the right candidate, this role provides an exceptionally high impact opportunity to make progress on AI risk by increasing the number of talented individuals working directly in the space.

You might do things like:

  • Programme manage the EU Tech Policy Fellowship. This would include setting ambitious goals, maintaining systems to track progress, and ensuring work is executed on schedule to a high level.
  • Contribute to the strategic direction of the programme, e.g. by conducting research and gathering data to inform improvements and changes to the programme.
  • Candidate vetting. Run a large recruitment round 1-2 times per year that reliably identifies exceptional individuals interested in a career in AI policy in Europe.
  • Stakeholder management. Maintain strong relationships with existing placement organisations and forge partnerships with new organisations that could host fellows.
  • Content creation & curation. Update our existing curriculum each year with state of the art research and by adapting its focus to the evolving needs of our fellows and the wider AI governance landscape. Alternatively, the EU Tech Policy Lead could contract subject matter expert(s) for this.
  • Content delivery. Deliver sessions online & in-person during the Brussels Summit about AI policy fundamentals. Alternatively, the EU Tech Policy Lead could contract subject matter expert(s) for this.

What we are looking for

You might be a particularly good fit for this role if you have

  • Strong project management skills. We are looking for someone with experience managing complex projects with multiple stakeholders. You should feel confident with goal-tracking, system-building, and keeping teams on track to meet ambitious deadlines.
  • An ability to work autonomously and excel with relatively little supervision almost immediately. We’re excited to find a proactive self-starter to join our team.
  • Excellent communication skills, both written and verbal. You convey complex ideas clearly and transparently.
  • A strong understanding of AI governance. For example, you are familiar with the content in the AI Safety Fundamentals Governance Course and likely prioritise reducing risks from advanced AI within your career.

It’s a bonus but not required to have:

  • Past experience in US/UK/EU policymaking or government work, and/or past experience working on AI governance at a company contributing to the cutting edge of AI R&D.
  • A strong network of contacts within the AI governance and policy field. 
  • A graduate degree.
  • Ability to attend our upcoming Brussels Summit (February 26th - March 1st). A full-time start date could be later than this.

We encourage speculative applications; we expect many strong candidates will not meet all of the criteria listed here.

Impact

  • AI risk is a pressing problem: There are ~400 people around the world working directly on reducing AI catastrophic risks. Given the scale of the problem and the neglectedness of the field, we believe that working on risks from advanced AI is of crucial importance right now. Within that, growing the number of talented people working on AI risks within governments and other institutions should be a key priority.
  • Multiplier effect: As a talent development organisation, Talos is a high-leverage method for tackling the problem. By working to significantly increase the quantity and quality of talent entering this space, it’s possible to make much more progress on reducing AI risk than you could through just your own efforts. 
  • Success to date: The EU Tech Policy Fellowship appears to have had a significant impact. We’ve supported ~30 EU Tech Policy Fellows to date:

Benefits

Our benefits include:

  • 28 days of paid holiday (including national holidays)
  • Standard UK pension, with 3% contribution from employer
  • Flexible work schedule & location (when and where you work is mostly up to you)
  • A supportive work environment to grow and do your best work
  • Compensation:
    • Executive Director: €70,000 - €90,000. We are committed to attracting top talent and are willing to offer a higher salary for the right candidate.
    • EU Tech Policy Lead: €55,000 - €75,000. We are committed to attracting top talent and are willing to offer a higher salary for the right candidate.

Application Process

  • Submit your application form by December 27th with your resume/CV. We’ll be conducting rolling interviews, so apply earlier to be considered sooner.
  • If selected, you will be invited for 1-2 interviews where we can both assess your fit for the role.
  • Next, you will complete a 3-5 hour work sample relevant to the role.
  • Finally, promising candidates will be invited for a multi-day work trial with our team (in-person strongly preferred). We can accommodate in-person work trials in Brussels, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, London, and Edinburgh.

 

Apply here by December 27th

  1. ^

     In Greek mythology, Talos was a bronze automaton tasked with protecting Europa from pirates and invaders. Talos represents innovation and evokes a safeguarding presence. The organisation is being registered as Talos Institute, however we are open to the incoming ED proposing a name change.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by