Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
wuschel1
0
0

One trillion dollars by Andreas Eschbach

Random guy ends up with a one trillion dollar fortune, and tries to use it to make the workd a better place.

Themes include:

-consideration of longterm vs. short term effects

-corruption through money and power

-doomerism

-galaxybraining yourself into letting go of deontological norms

-a carecature of an EA as an antagonist

Reply
See in context
by JWS 🔸
3 min read 4

9

Building effective altruismEffective altruism art and fictionEffective altruism in the mediaEffective altruism messagingExistential risk fictionBooks
Frontpage

Introduction

(Note: Consider any work of fiction I mention to be a spoiler risk. I've made sure each title is in bold italics so you can quickly scan and, if you don't want to risk spoiling yourself, quickly move on)

This summer a film came out which captured the hearts and minds of EAs. Focused on a fantastic performance from the lead in the title role, it was based around one of the most lasting creations of the 20th century which continues to have profound consequences to this day, but was told with skill by a talented director and is regarded by many as one of the best films released this year.

But enough about Barbie... Christopher Nolan's nuclear epic Oppenheimer was released on the very same day and a major plot thread was the threat that, in testing their new creation, the team at Los Alamos could inadventantly bring about the end of the world (and also any future for humanity). It also questioned whether the bomb should have ever been created at all, how the US ought to have dealt with growing nuclear tensions with the Soviet Union, and many other important themes.

I saw it with non-EA friends and really enjoyed the discussion about it afterwards, where people touched on themes and ideas that are often found in EA Forum posts and classic EA-recommended sources. It got me thinking about other places where I've seen EA-adjacaent or EA-explicit films in fiction before, so here I present my (somewhat off the top) list to consider:[1]

My (non-exhaustive) List

Outer Wilds (2019)- To be honest I think this is the best videogame ever made, so if you have any interest at all in those you should stop reading this now and start playing this game.[2] I'm going to say nothing else about it, except that it's fairly easy to read some parts of the plot in a longtermist way

It's a Wonderful Life (1946) - This Christmas Classic may be the most obviously EA non-EA piece of fiction ever:

  • A man gets to see the counterfactual impact of his life and judge whether it did good or not. 80,000 Hours need to call Clarence Odbody stat!
  • Indeed, it actually centers on the question not just of his actions but his existence or non-existence too
  • Our protagonist is relentlessly altruistic, and our antagonist is relentlessly greedy (and he definitely doesn't earn-to-give)
  • A potential bio-risk is averted even at personal cost to the person intervening
  • A child is saved from drowning in a pond

This is not a coincidence because nothing is ever a coincidence.

Strong Female Protagonist (2012-2018) - Great webcomic (one of the best things I've read this year I think). Unfortunately it got put on hiatus on the final issue and never came back, but issue 3 deals will some pretty explicitly EA dilemmas. In fact, so much of it reads like grappling with EA ideas in a superhero story.

Okja (2017) - Director Bong doesn't make bad films. This one isn't an allegory, it's just about an attempt to save an animal from the cruelty it would face at the hands of the factory-farming complex. It's also got criticism of working within the capitalist system for your EA-sceptical friends too! Would make a powerful but tough double-bill with Animal Liberation Now.

Person of Interest (2011-2016) - How do you create a TV show about rival superintelligent AIs vying for the future of humanity? Simple, don't tell the network, pitch it as a buddy-cop drama with a twist, and slowly reveal the "real" plot once your show has momentum. Also a candidate for the most underrated TV show of all time.

Chernobyl (2019) - "What is the cost of lies?". I had to find something which really fits the "Improving Institutional Decision-Making" cause area that I feel drawn towards. After the initial disaster our characters (as well as many extras) show great bravery and moral character, but are constantly constrained and fighting against an inherentely broken set of institutions that limit the effectiveness of their actions. 

Schindler's List (1993) - There's a particular scene, near the end of the film, which is very relevant to Singer's thought experiment about what you would give up to save a life, and the question of where your limits of responsibility are in a world which contains injustice, suffering, and evil. Amongst an incredibly powerful and moving film, this scene has stood out to me.

What do you think?

Are we underestimating the impact that fiction can have in introducing EA concepts to a wider audience? Is there a way to help promote this, or is it impossible to 'pick winners' in what is essentially a creative process? 

I'd also really like to hear your own examples of engaging with a piece of fiction and having your EA-proximity alarm go off, feel free to add examples in the comments (though, of course, be mindful of spoilers if so)

  1. ^

    If you haven't seen/read/played one of the above, and you're on this Forum, then I'd strongly recommend all of them! 

  2. ^

    And after you finish the base game, download and play the DLC

9

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Rasool3
1
0

Seconding Strong Female Protagonist, and noting that it is also available as a printed graphic novel for those who prefer to read offline

Reply
🔸Zachary Brown3
1
0
  • Frankenstein (Mary Shelley): moral circle expansion to a human created AI, kinda.
  • Elizabeth Costello (J M Coetzee): novel about a professor who gives animal rights lectures. The chapter that's most profoundly about animal ethics was published as "The Lives of Animals" which was printed with commentary from Peter Singer (in narrative form!).
  • Darkness at Noon (Arthur Koestler): Novel with reflections from an imprisoned old Bolshevik, reflecting on his past revolutionary activity. Interesting reflections on ends vs. means reasoning, and on weighing considerations of moral scale / the numbers affected vs personal emotional connection in moral tradeoff scenarios.
Reply
wuschel1
0
0

One trillion dollars by Andreas Eschbach

Random guy ends up with a one trillion dollar fortune, and tries to use it to make the workd a better place.

Themes include:

-consideration of longterm vs. short term effects

-corruption through money and power

-doomerism

-galaxybraining yourself into letting go of deontological norms

-a carecature of an EA as an antagonist

Reply
More from JWS 🔸
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Neel Nanda
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
TL;DR Having a good research track record is some evidence of good big-picture takes, but it's weak evidence. Strategic thinking is hard, and requires different skills. But people often conflate these skills, leading to excessive deference to researchers in the field, without evidence that that person is good at strategic thinking specifically. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, but it's hard, and you shouldn't assume I succeed! Introduction I often find myself giving talks or Q&As about mechanistic interpretability research. But inevitably, I'll get questions about the big picture: "What's the theory of change for interpretability?", "Is this really going to help with alignment?", "Does any of this matter if we can’t ensure all labs take alignment seriously?". And I think people take my answers to these way too seriously. These are great questions, and I'm happy to try answering them. But I've noticed a bit of a pathology: people seem to assume that because I'm (hopefully!) good at the research, I'm automatically well-qualified to answer these broader strategic questions. I think this is a mistake, a form of undue deference that is both incorrect and unhelpful. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, and I think this makes me better at my job, but this is far from sufficient. Being good at research and being good at high level strategic thinking are just fairly different skillsets! But isn’t someone being good at research strong evidence they’re also good at strategic thinking? I personally think it’s moderate evidence, but far from sufficient. One key factor is that a very hard part of strategic thinking is the lack of feedback. Your reasoning about confusing long-term factors need to extrapolate from past trends and make analogies from things you do understand better, and it can be quite hard to tell if what you're saying is complete bullshit or not. In an empirical science like mechanistic interpretability, however, you can get a lot more fe
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
24
Last week to apply for the Futurekind AI Fellowship! (deadline: April 1)
Jay Luong
· · 1m read
0
0
46
EA Global Referral Program
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read
5
5
3
Apply to become a Futurekind AI Facilitator or Mentor (deadline: April 10)
Jay Luong
· · 2m read
0
0
View more