Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Jan-Willem, Cillian_, SteveThompson
6 min read 4

53

Opportunities to take actionPolicyAI safetyCareer choiceJob listing (closed)Training for GoodAI governanceEuropean Union
Frontpage

Announcing the EU Tech Policy Fellowship, a cost-covered programme to catapult relevant graduates into high-impact career paths in European policy and Tech Policy roles. 

Summary 

Training for Good is excited to announce the EU Technology Policy Fellowship. This programme enables promising EU citizens to launch careers focused on regulating high-priority emerging technologies, especially AI and cybersecurity. 

This fellowship consists of three components:

  • Remote study group (July - August, 4 hours a week): A 6 week part-time study group covering AI governance & technology policy fundamentals.
  • Policy training in Brussels (late August / early September - exact date TBD): An intensive week-long bootcamp in Brussels featuring workshops, guest lectures from relevant experts and networking events.
  • Tracks: Fellows will then participate in one of two tracks depending on their interests.
    • Track 1 (September - December full time): Fellows will be matched with a host organisation working on European tech regulation for a ~3 month placement between September and December 2022.
    • Track 2 (September): Fellows will receive job application support and guidance to pursue a career in the European Commission, party politics or related policy jobs in Europe. 
      • This will include career workshops, feedback on CVs, interview training and mentorship from experienced policy professionals.

Other important points:

  • If you have any questions or would like to learn more about the program and whether or not it’s the right fit for you, Training for Good will be hosting an informal information session on Thursday April 7 (5.30pm CET), please subscribe here for that session.
  • This fellowship is only open to EU citizens.
  • Modest stipends are available to cover living and relocation costs. We expect most stipends to be between €1,250 and €1,750 per month (though will take individual circumstances into consideration).
    • For track 1, stipends are available for up to 4 months while participating in placements.
    • For track 2, stipends are available for up to 1 month while exploring and applying for policy roles.

Apply here by April 19th.

 

The Programme

The programme spans ~5 months from July to December, is fully cost-covered, and where needed, participants can avail of stipends to cover living costs. It consists of 3 major parts:

  • Remote study group (July - August): A 6 week study group covering AI governance & technology policy fundamentals (draft curriculum). This study group will run from July 18 - August 28, including ~4 hours of readings and a 1 hour discussion each week.
  • Policy training in Brussels (exact date TBD): An intensive week-long bootcamp in Brussels featuring workshops, guest lectures from relevant experts and networking events.
    • This training will either run the week commencing August 29 or September 5 (exact date to be decided).
    • All accomodation, food & travel costs will be fully covered by Training for Good.
  • Tracks: Fellows will then participate in one of two tracks depending on their interests.
    • Track 1 (September - December): Fellows will be matched with a host organisation working on European tech regulation for a ~3 month placement between September and December 2022.
    • Track 2 (September): Fellows will receive job application support and guidance to pursue a career in the European Commission, party politics or related policy jobs in Europe. 
      • This will include career workshops, feedback on CVs, interview training and mentorship from experienced policy professionals.
      • Modest stipends are available to fellows during this period to explore and apply for policy roles for up to 1 month.

 

Who should apply

Ideal candidates for this fellowship might have:: 

  • Excellent academic records and relevant extracurricular activities
  • A strong interest / educational background in policy, technology or artificial intelligence
  • A desire to maximize the good they do with their careers

In addition to the above, we expect that:

  • Many candidates will be recent graduates or current students nearing the end of their studies.
  • Some applicants will have a technical background. This is seen as a plus, but is by no means a requirement. Additional pre-reading materials will be shared where needed.

This fellowship is only open to EU citizens. If you’re interested in similar US-focused programmes, we recommend the Open Philanthropy Technology Policy Fellowship.

 

Our Aims

This programme aims to provide EAs with the ambition to play an important role in shaping European AI/Tech policy and to gain a headstart in their career. They will leave the programme with:

  • Increased knowledge of the most important aspects of AI Governance
  • An understanding of the regulatory landscape in Brussels
  • Increased exposure and a better network
  • Either career capital (for example, having spent 3 months interning at a relevant institution) or completed applications for relevant positions within the EU institutions
  • A valuable addition to their CV/Resume.

 

Placements at Host Institutions (Track 1)

Each placement will be unique. Fellows will be matched with a partner organisation based on the needs of the organisation and the fellows' skills. We have agreed placements with The Future Society, Centre for European Policy Studies, and NLAI Coalition (among others).

  • Partner organisations will host a fellow, physically or remotely.
  • Placements will typically last for 3-4 months between September and December 2022.
  • Fellows will have one or more designated task(s) / practical assignment(s) with clear goals.
  • Fellows will participate in team meetings and other relevant activities to provide a good impression of what a career in this field would entail.

Placements will be based on the fit between candidates and our partner institutions. Both participants and partners will be consulted in this process and partners will interview potential interns. 

 

Job Application Support (Track 2)

Support, mentoring, feedback, and guidance in what, how and when to apply for relevant jobs in EU policy will be provided for those wishing to pursue a position at the European Commission, in party politics or in other high–impact policy roles.​

  • Fellows will receive a 1 month stipend to explore and apply for policy roles focused on emerging technology in Europe.
  • Fellows will participate in career decision workshops to determine which policy roles they might have high personal fit for.
  • Fellows will receive feedback on their CVs and interview training.
  • Training for Good will provide feedback on fellows' applications.
  • Connections and mentorship opportunities from others working in emerging technology policy in Europe.

 

Our Rationale for running this program

  • We are (non-exclusively) targeting soon-to-be graduates and fresh graduates with backgrounds in either policy or tech with a view towards placing them into particularly focused paths to impactful careers.
  • We believe that gaining exposure and a relevant network is key to building career capital and influence over time. “Breaking in” is challenging—but once in, individuals can positively influence upcoming European tech policy.
  • By helping applicants at this first inflection point, we believe we may be able to significantly alter their counterfactual impact over time.
  • Many great EA candidates don’t apply for tech policy roles simply because they lack the application skills, network or the confidence.
  • Testing out, in a robust way, whether or not candidates are a good fit for various roles in policy is valuable to their decision making processes.
  • By providing stipends, we are sponsoring individuals to explore valuable career paths that they otherwise could not afford to take time off for.

 

Apply Now

To apply for European Technology Policy Fellowship, please fill out this application form by 19th April.

The application process includes:

  • An application form (deadline April 19th).
  • A 1-2 hour test task.
  • A 30-60 minute interview with Training for Good and your host organisation .

If you are unsure whether you should apply

Please contact janwillem@trainingforgood.com with any questions.

We are thankful to the Long Term Future Fund for their generous support of the 2022 European Technology Policy Fellowship and for  CHERI's incredibly helpful ongoing advice on this program


 

53

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
HaydnBelfield8
0
0

This is really awesome! Well done for launching this, very excited to see what you achieve

Reply
Tessa A 🔸7
0
0

This project sounds great! You said this is focused on "high-priority emerging technologies, especially AI and cybersecurity". My network is mostly composed of synthetic biologists, would this also be an appropriate opportunity for them?

Reply
Jan-Willem3
0
0

Hi Tessa,  although biorisks can be included in risks coming from high-priority emerging technologies, we decided for this round to focus on AI / cybersecurity risks for placements and therefore also for our training content. 

After the program we will re-evaluate and possibly re-run the program including expansion to other areas (as biorisks). We will announce this on the Forum and feel free to subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates.

Reply
Leo5
0
0

Could anyone help me downvote the 'Job listing (open)' tag? Applications closed two days ago. Thanks

Reply
More from Jan-Willem
44
Workshops to Improve Institutional Decision-Making in Government
Jan-Willem
· · 6m read
2
2
142
Introducing Training for Good (TFG)
3 authors
· · 13m read
11
11
80
Training for Good - Update & Plans for 2023
4 authors
· · 12m read
1
1
View more
Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
Recent opportunities in AI safety
57
Quick nudge to apply to the LTFF grant round (closing on Saturday)
calebp
· · 1m read
7
7
4
The Centre for Long-Term Resilience is recruiting a Policy and Operations Strategist
Tatiana K. Nesic Skuratova
· · 4m read
0
0
3
Apply to become a Futurekind AI Facilitator or Mentor (deadline: April 10)
Jay Luong
· · 2m read
0
0
View more