(Audio version here, or search for "Joe Carlsmith Audio" on your podcast app.)
> “There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall?”
>
> - C.S. Lewis
“The Human Condition,” by René Magritte (Image source here)
1. Introduction
Sometimes, my thinking feels more “real” to me; and sometimes, it feels more “fake.” I want to do the real version, so I want to understand this spectrum better. This essay offers some reflections.
I give a bunch of examples of this “fake vs. real” spectrum below -- in AI, philosophy, competitive debate, everyday life, and religion. My current sense is that it brings together a cluster of related dimensions, namely:
* Map vs. world: Is my mind directed at an abstraction, or it is trying to see past its model to the world beyond?
* Hollow vs. solid: Am I using concepts/premises/frames that I secretly suspect are bullshit, or do I expect them to point at basically real stuff, even if imperfectly?
* Rote vs. new: Is the thinking pre-computed, or is new processing occurring?
* Soldier vs. scout: Is the thinking trying to defend a pre-chosen position, or is it just trying to get to the truth?
* Dry vs. visceral: Does the content feel abstract and heady, or does it grip me at some more gut level?
These dimensions aren’t the same. But I think they’re correlated – and I offer some speculations about why. In particular, I speculate about their relationship to the “telos” of thinking – that is, to the thing that thinking is “supposed to” do.
I also describe some tags I’m currently using when I remind myself to “really think.” In particular:
* Going slow
* Following curiosity/aliveness
* Staying in touch with why I’m thinking about something
* Tethering my concepts to referents that feel “real” to me
* Reminding myself that “arguments are lenses on the world”
* Tuning into a relaxing sense of “helplessness” about the truth
* Just actually imagining differ
This is false. (The analogy between corporations and unaligned AGI is misleading for many other reasons, of course, not the least of which is that corporations are not actually coherent singleton agents, but are made of people.)
Profit is residual income after inputs, wages and interests are paid. It is a signal that says “this firm is successfully deploying capital to serve the welfare of the consumer” (consumer=person weighted by wealth).
Of course, if the society does not give rights to some sentient beings, and torturing them is an intermediate step in the production of valued goods, it will make profits. In the past, when slave labour was a legal input, capitalists used it, and when the input became unavailable, they simply made profits using other available inputs.
Capitalism is a social mechanism. It allows social coordination in a massive and extremely efficient way. It empowers, multiplies and carry to the extreme existing social values and preferences.