[EDIT: The original title of this question was: "If FTX/Alameda currently control Anthropic, who will end up controlling it?". Based on the comments so far, it does not seem likely that FTX/Alameda currently control Anthropic.]
If I understand correctly, FTX/Alameda have seemingly invested $500M in Anthropic, according to a Bloomberg article:
FTX/Alameda were funneling customer money into effective altruism. Bankman-Fried seems to have generously funded a lot of effective altruism charities, artificial-intelligence and pandemic research, Democratic political candidates, etc. One $500 million entry on the desperation balance sheet is “Anthropic,” a venture investment in an AI safety company. [...]
That seems consistent with the following excerpts from this page on Anthropic's website:
Anthropic, an AI safety and research company, has raised $580 million in a Series B.
.
The Series B follows the company raising $124 million in a Series A round in 2021. The Series B round was led by Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO of FTX. The round also included participation from Caroline Ellison, Jim McClave, Nishad Singh, Jaan Tallinn, and the Center for Emerging Risk Research (CERR).
Is it likely that FTX/Alameda currently have >50% voting power over Anthropic? If they do, who will end up having control over Anthropic?
If the market value of that stake is less than FTX paid, the debtor-in-possession's first thought is going to be whether this is potentially avoidable as a fraudulent conveyance. I don't have the desire to explore that possibility, but the sum is large enough that the DIP could be interested in an argument that FTX overpaid while insolvent and was motivated by ideological reasons rather than business judgment. Otherwise, the equity stake will presumably be sold.