Hide table of contents

Top items:

  • Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act against Venezuelans and the Tren de Aragua gang. He subsequently deported 238 alleged members to El Salvador, ignoring a court order.
  • Chinese “invasion barges” were deployed in an exercise.
  • The US resumed military aid to Ukraine, and a ceasefire in the next six months at 50/50

Forecaster Estimates

Forecasters, on aggregate, think that a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine in the next six months is a coin toss (48%, ranging from 35% to 70%). Polymarket’s forecast is higher, at 61%, for a ceasefire of any duration by July.

Forecasters also consider it a coin toss (aggregate of 49%; ranging from 28% to 70%) whether an agreement to expand France’s nuclear umbrella will be reached by 2027 such that French nuclear weapons will be deployed in another European country by 2030. They emphasize that the US is revealing itself to be an unreliable defense partner, and that Germany’s bases could be refitted to accommodate French weapons, but also that timelines for such developments are usually very long.

Forecasters think there’s a <1% probability that the US military will invade Canada, with an aggregate estimate of 0.2% by the end of 2028.

Geopolitics

United States

Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act against Venezuelan gang members, and used it to deport 238 alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador, ignoring a court order. The deportation flights were already in the air when the court order was received, and administration officials claimed that the court order did not apply because the flights were over international waters at the time.

Trump claimed that Biden’s pardons of a January 6 committee are “void” because they were made using an autopen, even though autopen signatures are legally binding.

DOGE efforts to reduce the federal workforce are ongoing. The Department of Education staff has been cut by about 50%. All DHHS employees have been offered a $25,000 buyout.

A federal court ruled that thousands of federal employees were fired illegally and must be reinstated. When asked if the Trump administration will comply with court orders, White House Press Secretary Leavitt said the judge’s orders were “unconstitutional” and that the administration would appeal the decision.

The chief architect of Project 2025 said that the project’s goals have been implemented to an extent “actually way beyond my wildest dreams”.

US plans to revoke visas and green cards of people identified using AI to be Hamas supporters.

Trump's “border czar,” Tom Homan, has said that, "there are limitations to free speech," as pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was detained for protesting against Israel.

The US has been added to an international watchlist for rapid decline in civic freedoms.

In a speech at the Department of Justice, Trump said, "I believe that CNN and MSNBC, who literally write 97.6% bad about me, are political arms of the Democrat Party. And in my opinion, they are really corrupt and they are illegal. What they do is illegal."

A US government shutdown has been averted. Not everyone is happy with the resulting compromise.

The US Southern Command has been instructed to develop plans to gain control of the Panama Canal.

The Trump administration’s foreign aid cuts also froze aid to IAEA nuclear inspectors.

Canada imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide range of US products.

A LessWrong blog post speculates that Elon Musk may have a mood disorder and may be moving from bipolar type II to bipolar type I, which has more extreme mood swings.

Europe

The US has resumed delivery of military aid to and sharing intelligence with Ukraine, as Kyiv says it is ready to accept a ceasefire proposal. The US has also introduced additional sanctions on Russia. Putin has said that he won’t agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine unless many harsh conditions are met.

The Russian army launched a major counteroffensive in Kursk. Putin and later Trump claimed that Ukrainian troops in the Kursk area were encircled and called for their surrender to avoid a massacre. But Ukrainian troops were not encircled.

Kremlin officials continue to use narratives similar to those that the Kremlin has used to justify its invasions of Ukraine to set informational conditions to justify future aggression against NATO member states, says the Institute for the Study of War.

The captain of a container ship, a Russian national, has been arrested and charged after his ship crashed into an oil tanker that was providing fuel for the US military in the North Sea.

The Latvian president said that European countries should “absolutely” introduce conscription.

The US and Europe have been relying on Russia for nuclear fuel. Finding alternative sources won’t be easy.

European countries are wondering whether the US puts secret “kill switches” in its military aircraft and weapons systems.

The EU is considering imposing sanctions against Russia's “shadow fleet.”

Middle East

Trump is pushing to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran, and said recently that, “something’s going to happen very soon” with Iran. Ayatollah Khamenei continues to resist serious nuclear negotiations with the US, although the country has signaled some limited willingness to talk. Iran’s resistance to negotiations with the US increases the probability that the US or Israel will engage in military action against Iran.

A Russian official has said that Iran may agree to limit its nuclear program if sanctions are lifted. Iran held trilateral nuclear talks with China and Russia in Beijing on March 14, shortly after rejecting a negotiation offer from Trump.

Russia, China and Iran launched their annual joint naval drills in the Gulf of Oman. The exercise is themed, “Creating Peace and Security Together”, and observers from other countries, including South Africa, Pakistan, and Oman, are witnessing the exercises.

In Syria, a peace agreement was reached that incorporates the largely Kurdish, US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces into the Syrian army. On the other hand, more than 1,000 people have died and Alawite civilians have been massacred as sectarian violence and revenge killings roiled Syria. The UN Security Council agreed to issue a statement to condemn the massacre of Alawites in Syria. After violence in Syria, Israel says it is prepared to defend Syria’s Druze population.

The UN reports that no supplies are entering Gaza, as Israel imposes total food and energy blockades. Israel has cut off the electricity supply to Gaza, according to Israel’s energy minister, in an effort to force Hamas to release its remaining hostages. The Israeli blockade also threatens Gaza’s water supply.

The US and Israel have approached the East African countries of Sudan, Somalia and Somaliland about the possibility of resettling civilians from Gaza.

Houthi rebels have warned that they will resume attacks against Israeli vessels in the Red Sea if Israel continues its blockade of Gaza. The US has launched attacks against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Africa

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the government and the M23 rebels will begin direct talks next week according to officials in Angola, which will be mediating the talks.

In parallel, South Africa is withdrawing its troops from the eastern DRC, where it has been supporting the DRC government in its fight against the M23 rebels, as fighting there has escalated beyond what South Africa is willing to commit its troops to.

The African Union is warning that Sudan is at risk of partition.

Tigray officials have warned that Ethiopia and Eritrea are on a path to war.

Asia

China's 'invasion barges', which we reported a few weeks ago, have been spotted on drills for the first time. Video footage of the barges is also now available. Taiwan has a limited number of beaches that would support a D-day style invasion, and the significance of these barges is that they might greatly expand the range of initial invasion spots, making war planning more tricky for Taiwan.

North Korea announced that the country is building a nuclear-powered submarine. For North Korea to be successful, Russia’s help would probably be required. But even then, the country’s first-generation submarines would likely be noisier and would perhaps not provide for a full nuclear deterrent.

The US and South Korea held joint military exercises.

The Myanmar junta chief announced that elections would be held in December or January. However, we aren’t holding our breath, as elections have been postponed before.

Pakistan warned that the Pakistani Taliban are becoming more powerful.In Pakistan, Baloch rebels captured over 100 hostages, and the group claims they killed 214. A rescue operation was messy and deadly.

In Bangladesh, student protestors whose actions sparked the ouster of the former premier have formed a new political party.

Biorisk

Europe has reported the highest number of measles cases in more than 25 years, according to UNICEF and the WHO.

Namibia has seen its first cholera case in a decade.

Tech and AI

OpenAI published a paper in which they found that their AI models engage in reward-hacking behaviour. When using a monitor to catch “bad chains of thought” and train a model not to engage in this behaviour, they found that monitoring only caused the model to hide its intentions in such a way that the monitor did not catch the behaviour; the AIs still engaged in the behaviour.

 

The company warned that by doing this, we could lose our ability to measure when models are hiding their intent:

We believe that chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring may be one of the few effective methods we have for supervising superhuman models. At this stage, we strongly recommend that AI developers training frontier reasoning models refrain from applying strong supervision directly to CoTs. Our experiments show that light optimization pressure can produce more performant and aligned models; however, it will be hard to measure in practice when models begin hiding their intent, and so even if light supervision is used, we recommend treading with extreme caution.

OpenAI made proposals for the US AI Action Plan (full submission), in which they said that the “AI race” with China is lost if they don’t get to train AIs on copyrighted materials. Shakeel Hashim finds their lobbying inconsistent with OpenAI’s Deep Research System Card

Several of our biology evaluations indicate our models are on the cusp of being able to meaningfully help novices create known biological threats, which would cross our high risk threshold. We expect current trends of rapidly increasing capability to continue, and for models to cross this threshold in the near future. In preparation, we are intensifying our investments in safeguards.

OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane told Axios that:

"Globally, the conversation around AI has changed," said Lehane. "There's been a definite pivot. ... Maybe the biggest risk here is actually missing out on the opportunity. There was a pretty significant vibe shift when people became more aware and educated on this technology and what it means."

The former head of Airbus has urged Europe to shift attention towards building armed robots.

Meta began testing its first in-house AI chip.

The US FTC is moving ahead with an antitrust probe of Microsoft that was opened in the final days of the Biden administration.

Sam Altman has called DeepSeek a state-controlled AI developer and has called for “PRC-produced” (People's Republic of China-produced) models to be banned.

Climate

The Trump administration is considering ending the lease for the support office for the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory on Mauna Loa in Hawaii, calling into question the future of the laboratory. The station has been monitoring CO2 levels since the 1950s.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f