I

InTheSky

80 karmaJoined

Comments
6

That's not really an argument at all. How do we prevent future suffering? Is enriching the global poor in line with that ambition? I can think of ways that it isn't—that it will lead to increased suffering. A counterargument would evide that global development will not lead to increased suffering. That we like having undergone development ourselves is not a counterargument and does not imply that funding global development is of positive utility.

InTheSky
1
0
0
70% agree

I'd be doing less good with my life if I hadn't heard of effective altruism

It’s because of EA that I’m pursuing a career in disease prevention

Wow, this is completely horrifying. Why are they not killed first? Not that that wouldn’t be horrifying too, but obviously this is worse.

I see, thanks. Is it possible to measure spontaneous CNS activity from beginning to end of the stunning and asphyxiating process?

I see, thank you! Has relative CNS inactivity been validated as a proxy for insensibility? Like, do humans with recorded low CNS activity report having been insensible during that episode?