Hi Madeleine, PauseAI might be a useful example for your list, @Toby Tremlett🔹 already flagged it above.
On whether it's an "EA organisation" (to @david_reinstein's question on Toby's thread): it isn't, but it shares most of the values and collaborates closely with both the EA and broader AI safety ecosystems, and that collaboration is central to our theory of change. We're squarely a movement-building / constituency-building org of the kind you're describing: our bet is on building an organised public constituency that creates the political conditions for governance of frontier AI.
On your two axes, we sit at the far upstream, low-measurability corner. I'll be candid that converting movement activity into attributable political outcomes is hard to measure, but it's something we're actively trying to get better at. We've got a longer write-up of our ToC coming soon and I'm happy to share it when it's up.
Hi Madeleine, PauseAI might be a useful example for your list, @Toby Tremlett🔹 already flagged it above.
On whether it's an "EA organisation" (to @david_reinstein's question on Toby's thread): it isn't, but it shares most of the values and collaborates closely with both the EA and broader AI safety ecosystems, and that collaboration is central to our theory of change. We're squarely a movement-building / constituency-building org of the kind you're describing: our bet is on building an organised public constituency that creates the political conditions for governance of frontier AI.
On your two axes, we sit at the far upstream, low-measurability corner. I'll be candid that converting movement activity into attributable political outcomes is hard to measure, but it's something we're actively trying to get better at. We've got a longer write-up of our ToC coming soon and I'm happy to share it when it's up.