Hide table of contents

Hi everyone,

 

Last month, CEA started Y Combinator. This has already had a very positive impact on the team. We’re getting a lot of advice and attention from the partners, and we’re feeling excited about building CEA.

 

January has been our best month ever in terms of growth of Giving What We Can pledgers, in significant part because of the pledge drive, with 199 members.

 

We wrapped up our fundraising drive, raising $2 million. We are also in the process of applying for a grant from Open Philanthropy, and some donors are waiting until we hear from them before deciding where to donate.

 

This month we also had some significant criticism, confusion and discussion about effective altruism in general, and Giving What We Can Pledge in particular. In response, we’re going to try to be more communicative and transparent with the effective altruism community. Julia Wise has written a post clarifying the Giving What We Can Pledge; I’ve written a little about what CEA’s next big product will be on the forum. I intend to write more to explain what CEA does and why in the future.   



Best Wishes,

 

Will

 

CEA METRICS

 

Total new members this month (January)

199

Total new members January 2016

113

Total new members last month (December)

171

Total new members December 2015

115

 

New members per month since 2009:

 

GWWC monthly new members.JPG



Cumulative membership total since 2009

 

GWWC cumulative member growth.JPG

CEA Financials

We’re currently moving over to a new accounting system and are in the process of applying for a grant from the Open Philanthropy Project so we’ll be able to share more financial data in the next few months.

 

CEA Division Updates:

 

Below are brief descriptions of the work from the different teams within CEA over the past month.

 

 

COMMUNITY AND OUTREACH DIVISION

 

Online Infrastructure and Marketing Team

 

The Online Infrastructure and Marketing Team are all in the US for Y Combinator. They are are focusing on money pledged in the first year as their main metric (as suggested by Y Combinator) as well as continuing to support the community. For this reason, they’ve focussed on the pledge drive (resulting in 318 new members), conversations and interviews with the community and significant work to improve our website infrastructure (including, for example, the pledge sign up form). We hope these improvements will create a better user experience for the community and give us better access to data on our different activities.

 

Community, Chapters and Events Team

 

EA Global

EA Global conferences are one of the main ways we support collaboration in the community. For this reason we published this short update to let the community know we are moving the EAG 2017 Boston event from May to June to ensure as much participation as possible.

As a reminder, this makes our current plans:

  • Boston conference in June (including topics in science, technology, and policy)

  • The Bay Area conference in July/August (primarily community-driven event)

  • UK conference in October/November (“EA Fundamentals” event, with an academic focus)

We’re conducting site visits over the next week and so expect to have more concrete dates before next month’s update.

EAGx

EAGx events remain an important way of not only connecting the community but also finding talented and promising members of the community to be the organisers. This month we have spent working on the remaining three conferences from the first application round (in Madison, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.), as well as restructuring EAGx based on the feedback we received throughout the inaugural year. Roxanne Heston has officially started working in the Executive Office, so EAGx will now be under the direction of the Events Team, allowing us to better integrate all of our events.

 

Chapters

Chapters proved important in getting new pledges during our pledge campaign, with 51 people citing Chapters as where they first heard about Giving What We Can. We are currently reviewing how best to support Chapters and have been evaluating their impact following on from the groups’ responses to the Winter Termly Review.

 

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

 

The Executive Office is a new team dedicated to managing the office of the CEO. Will is not only the CEO at the Centre for Effective Altruism, but is recognised as a public intellectual and leading figure in the effective altruism movement. Due to his rapidly expanding profile and responsibilities their purpose is to facilitate communication between Will, CEA and the outside world, devise strategy to help maintain and grow his influence, and manage his schedule and social media presence.

 

In addition to Will, this team consists of Emma Gray, Executive Assistant, and Roxanne Heston, Press Officer. This month they have been mainly focused on setting up the processes for the new team and helping to devise strategies to help build Will’s influence and connections. They have also been focused on freeing up more of Will’s time so that he can dedicate more of it to writing.

 

SPECIAL PROJECTS DIVISION

 

One of our top priorities this year is to narrow the focus of the research projects currently housed in this division. Over the past month, we’ve made progress in that direction. We are working closely with the Future of Humanity Institute to identify ways to better integrate its research with CEA’s and, soon, that of the Oxford Institute for Effective Altruism. Seb Farquhar, who led our policy advising work, is moving across the hall to the Future of Humanity Institute, where he will continue his work on existential and technological risk policy. We are also in discussion with Founders Pledge and GiveWell regarding whether some or all of our philanthropic advising team should move to those organizations.

 

A few specific highlights from the past month:

 

  • Seb published his investigation into changes in AI safety funding.

  • Seb organized and attended a launch event at the Finnish embassy in London for his report “Existential Risks - Diplomacy and Governance”, which he wrote for the Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

  • The Oxford Institute for Effective Altruism was awarded a grant by the Oxford John Fell Fund, which will pay Michelle Hutchinson’s salary for two years.

  • Owen Cotton-Barratt, Seb, and Will MacAskill attended the Future of Life Institute’s artificial intelligence conference in Asilomar, California.

  • Alwaleed Philanthropies, a $25 billion foundation for which CEA’s philanthropic advising team has provided advice, has publicly committed $3 million to the END Fund and, more generally, has embraced evidence-based philanthropy.

Comments3


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

That tiny little Alwaleed Philanthropies footnote tacked onto the end sounds like a big deal to me. Not only is it a pretty significant amount itself, it seems like it might also start conversations about evidence-based philanthropy among cultures and communities that EA hasn't traditionally had much of a foothold in.

In addition to Will, this team consists of Emma Gray, Executive Assistant, and Roxanne Heston, Press Officer. This month they have been mainly focused on setting up the processes for the new team and helping to devise strategies to help build Will’s influence and connections.

I don't have any problem with this, but stating it so clearly and bluntly comes off to me as kind of cultish.

I think this is admirable honesty about an influence-based strategy with a key person dependency. This makes it possible for people to look for ways to reduce risk, increase the upside, and point out possible downsides.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
35
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read