Hide table of contents
The host has requested RSVPs for this event
11 Going1 Maybe2 Can't Go
Hannah Tookey
Ben Stevenson
William McAuliffe
Daniela R. Waldhorn
Hannah McKay
Camille Lavoix
Constance Li
Rían O.M

Human consumption of shrimp has increased rapidly in recent decades. Yet, there are few requirements or guidelines for how farmers and fishers should treat shrimp used for food. Rethink Priorities is completing a series of reports, the Shrimp Welfare Sequence, to orient readers to a nascent field dedicated to incorporating welfare considerations into shrimp production. 

Our upcoming webinar, Shrimp Farming: Vast in Scale, Diverse in Welfare Challenges, provides a formal preview of the initial outputs of this work. We invite you to join Hannah McKay, Associate Researcher at Rethink Priorities, for a short presentation, followed by a Q&A to a panel of RP’s shrimp welfare researchers. The webinar will take place on Monday, November 20 from 11:00 am to 11:45 am EST (5:00 - 5:45 pm CET).

Please register here. You can also let us know via the form if you can’t attend but would like to be sent a recording. The rest of this post provides a preview of what the webinar will cover. 

Why Shrimp?

Is protecting the welfare of shrimp a worthwhile goal? Few studies have tested whether shrimp are sentient – i.e., capable of having positive or negative experiences – and some commentators are skeptical about existing confirmatory evidence (Crump et al., 2022Diggles, 2023). Given indefinite uncertainty about shrimp sentience, the Animal Sentience Precautionary Principle provides criteria for how to proceed:

Where there are threats of seriousnegative animal welfare outcomes, lack of full scientific certainty as to the sentience of the animals in question shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent those outcomes. (Birch, 2017, p. 3; emphasis is ours).

Accordingly, our goal is to assess whether shrimp used for food face serious and negative welfare threats. Upon determining that the animal sentience precautionary principle is indeed applicable, we also want to identify cost-effective measures to mitigate negative outcomes in shrimp production. 

The Scale of Potential Harm

The number of individuals affected by shrimp production is a key metric for the seriousness of potential welfare problems (ibid, p. 4). Hence, we begin by estimating how many shrimp are used for food each year. By converting data on the biomass of animals slaughtered each year to numbers of individuals, we find that wild-caught shrimp represent the majority of animals directly killed for food each year (~25 trillion). Meanwhile, we find that there are more shrimp alive on farms at any time than any other type of animal (~230 billion). 

Of course, if farmers and fishers treat shrimp well, then the large scale of production would not necessarily pose a welfare issue. However, suffering might be quite common, at least on farms. In particular, pre-slaughter mortality rates across a range of sources indicate that over half of farmed shrimp die before farmers deem them ready for slaughter

Welfare Threats on Farms

Why are shrimp so vulnerable on farms? We provide an overview of shrimp aquaculture to contextualize the answer. Although farming practices are highly heterogeneous, they vary on a continuum from "extensive" to "intensive." Extensive farms construct ponds near a water source where wild shrimp drift in due to the tide, where they remain confined due to dikes and screens. Extensive farms stock shrimp at low densities because the ponds have a limited amount of oxygen and food. Welfare issues on extensive farms are in large part due to a failure to control external threats, such as predation and environmental pollutants from other farms. 

Welfare issues on intensive farms, on the other hand, largely result from attempts to control the aquatic environment. In particular, intensive farmers employ technology and proactive management practices to increase aeration and food availability, allowing them to stock shrimp at higher densities. Higher densities result in greater amounts of leftover food and excrement, which can cause toxic levels of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Intensive farmers try to solve these issues, but in doing so create yet more welfare problems. For example, lining the bottom of the tank with plastic prevents the buildup of sludge, but it also prevents shrimp from burrowing, a potentially rewarding behavior. Even putting its effects on water quality aside, crowding increases cannibalism, disease transmission, and limits access to resting areas. 

Ranking Welfare Threats

Which of these issues is most concerning? We adapt Welfare Footprint's pain-track framework (Alonso & Schuck-Paim, 2021) to model the scale of each threat according to its duration, severity, and prevalence. We find that the issues which cause the most suffering in aggregate are (a) chronic and (b) affect the majority of shrimp, like high stocking density and poor water quality.

If you are interested in shrimp welfare, and concerned by threats to farmed shrimp, do come along to hear more from Hannah and participate in our Q&A with shrimp welfare experts. We look forward to seeing you on 20 November.

Everyone who RSVP'd to this event will be notified.
No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities