Hide table of contents

TL;DR

Thank you to everyone who has connected with us, and provided us with feedback/suggestions since our last post. We are so appreciative of your wisdom and helpfulness!

In this post, we briefly talk about the steps we took from researching, to iterating, to finalizing our mission statement.

By using the method of weighted factor models (WFM) described below, the final choice was simple to select because it was quantified and colored as the top score.


Intro

My co-founder Dr. Peter S. Park and I thought we had reached an agreement on our mission statement after completing Charity Entrepreneurship’s (CE) Founder’s Agreement document during the first month of our charity startup. However, when applying to fiscal sponsors and incubation programs, the maximum word/character limits for describing our organization poked holes in our confidence in articulating our vision.

This prompted us to finalize our mission statement in various word/character lengths.

 

The big question is... how do we resolve the disagreement? How can we narrow down our top mission statement options? Is there a specific methodology that could guide us?

Enter the CE’s handbook.

Almost 50% of the handbook discusses decision-making, indicating that CE places a high value on decision-making as a crucial skill for charity entrepreneurs. In Chapter 5, the handbook introduces the Swiss Army knife of decision-making, called multi-factor decision-making:

It involves combining multiple factors or variables into a single conclusion. Unlike the Swiss Army knife, this tool only gets stronger as you acquire other tools, as its combining process can get more informed and sophisticated.

In particular, it delves into the pros and cons of multi-factor decision-making using spreadsheets, or weighted factor models (WFM).

 

Having been a spreadsheet enthusiast even before reading the handbook, I’ve tinkered with and built sheets for everything from work tasks (like analyzing advertising campaigns, or tracking down conversions issues with marketing partners) to personal life things (like tracking my kids’ goals progress to reward them, or finding out which are the best Pokémon to invest stardust into in Pokémon Go).

 

Thanks to the handbook, the weighted factor model is now one of my go-to tools, and this methodology was applied to refine, converge, and ultimately select our mission statement.


 

Ten Steps Process

The handbook referenced this post (Using a Spreadsheet to Make Good Decisions: Five Examples), which has examples of how to apply the ten steps in different scenarios.

 

In short, here is the ten step process and how we applied it:

  1. Come up with a well-defined goal.
    • To write a clear and impactful mission statement
  2. Brainstorm many plausible solutions to achieve that goal.
    • Wrote many different mission statements
  3. Create criteria through which you will evaluate those solutions.
    • See the full list of criteria we came up with below
  4. Create custom weights for the criteria.
    • See image below for weights we used
  5. Quickly use intuition to prioritize the solutions on the criteria so far (e.g., high, medium, and low)
    • The intuition ranking in our case, is how each co-founder “likes” each mission statement
  6. Come up with research questions that would help you determine how well each solution fits the criteria
    • Step 6 and 7 aren’t really applicable in terms of additional research questions i don’t think
    • See image below for the scores where we nitpicked each mission statement based on different criteria
  7. Use the research questions to do shallow research into the top ideas (you can review more ideas depending on how long the research takes per idea, how important the decision is, and/or how confident you are in your intuitions)
  8. Use research to re-rate and re-rank the solutions
  9. Pick the top ideas worth testing and do deeper research or MVP testing, as is applicable
    • We took the highly scored missions statements and continued to iterate on them
  10. Repeat steps 8 and 9 until sufficiently confident in a decision.

 

Our Criteria

Shallow research we did to come up with the criteria to rank each mission statement:

  1. Start with Why & Purpose: Understand and articulate why the organization exists, its purpose, cause, or belief. Answer the questions: Why does the organization exist? Whom does it serve? How does it serve them? ("Start with Why" by Simon SinekHubSpot Blog, BigCommerce)
  2. Clarity, Conciseness, and Understandability: Craft a mission statement that is one to three sentences long, clear, and easily understood by anyone. Avoid industry-specific jargon or complex language. (WordStream, Grammarly, Why Having a Clear Vision and Mission Statement is Vital)
  3. Uniqueness & Authenticity: Ensure the mission statement stands out, differentiates the organization from others, and genuinely reflects its essence. (Describing what makes you unique in a mission statement, Why knowing your unique mission is the secret ingredient, Ownr)
  4. Audience-focused & Stakeholder Consideration: The mission statement should resonate with and be relevant to the target audience or stakeholders. Consider the interests of all key stakeholders. (Why Mission Statements and Company Values are Essential, How to write a powerful mission statement that resonates, The Compass for SBC)
  5. Value-infused & Alignment with Values and Culture: Incorporate the core values of the organization into the mission statement and ensure alignment with its culture. (The 5Ps of company purpose, Why Mission And Value Statements Matter)
  6. Inspiration & Motivation: The mission statement should inspire and motivate employees and stakeholders. (HubSpot Blog)
  7. Realism & Achievability: While being inspirational, the mission statement should also be realistic and achievable. (BigCommerce)
  8. Inclusivity & Specificity: Be broad enough to allow for the organization's growth and change but specific enough to provide clear direction. (BDC.ca, Indeed.com)
  9. Engage, Collaborate, and Review: Engage a diverse group from within the organization when drafting the mission statement and periodically review it for relevance. (The Compass for SBC, BigCommerce)

 

WFM for Our Mission Statement

Our goal was to make our mission statement truly resonate and at the same time not a complex WFM.

Thus, we focused on the top 6 criteria shown above, while splitting the “Start with Why” concept into 3 components. We wanted to ensure that the "Why" is at the heart of it because we think it is the foundation to inspire.

 

Brief word about the weighting

One of the reasons why I love the WFM is that it is very flexible. You, your co-founder, and your team can come up with the weighting for the different criteria you select.

Then if something radically changes, the weighting (in the sheet shown above would be the top row) can be updated easily to reveal what option is the new winner.

 

Start with Why

For us, we gave “Start with Why” a big weight. Reading "Start with Why" by Simon Sinek years ago made a profound impact on me, and I have benefited from many of the principles taught in that book in my business career.

The power of a mission statement is in its ability to inspire, guide, and unify an organization while also resonating with its broader audience. It's the foundation upon which organization stories are built and legacies are created.

Thus, we used a simplified formula for a mission statement based on the "Start With Why" book:

[WHY you exist] + [HOW you achieve your Why] + [WHAT you do]

or

To [YOUR WHY] by [YOUR HOW], we [YOUR WHAT]


Using this formula, here's an example of the top choice that surfaced from our mission statement WFM:

StakeOut.AI fights to safeguard humanity from AI-driven disempowerment (WHY). We use evidence-based outreach to inform people of the threats that advanced AI poses to their economic livelihoods and personal safety (HOW). Our mission is to create a united front for humanity, driving national and international coordination on robust solutions to AI-driven disempowerment (WHAT).



Our Invitation

I can send you our template to save you time

If you want to start using WFM and don’t want to spend the time to configure it, feel free to comment, message me on this forum or LinkedIn. I will send you a private link to give you a head start.

Notes on the template:

  • If you are working on something that does not require a word count, then you can simply remove column B.
  • You can change the weights (the top row) directly above each criteria. I like it so the weights all add up to 100 in cell C1 (or it will be cell B1, if you deleted column B because you didn’t need the word count).
  • There are comments inside the cells that will hopefully help you to use the sheet. You can always comment here to ask anything :)

 

Please help with our question if possible

We have reached a bottleneck of our charity entrepreneurship journey and need your wisdom and help. Please answer this question on Fiscal sponsorship, ops support, or incubation? if you can spare the time.

Thank you very much in advance for your help!
 

We’d love to connect with you

Again, thank you to those who have connected with us, and provided us with feedback/suggestions since our first post. We are so appreciative of your wisdom and helpfulness!

Like said in our last post, what SofiaBalderson said in Writing about my job: Co-founder of a new charity (early stage) about increasing the chances of success of a nonprofit startup rings true to me:

It’s impossible to know everything needed to lead a charity effectively. Thankfully, you can access these skills and knowledge through other people. A good network helps a lot. This could be an entrepreneurship hub, a mentor, other charity founders, or industry experts that support your organization’s mission.

 

My co-founder and I are always looking to connect to other like-minded people, other co-founders and experienced folks who are willing to advise us.

Please, please, please reach out as we’d love to connect with you! We welcome private messages via the EA forum or LinkedIn (Harry Luk and Dr. Peter S. Park).

 

Acknowledgment

I would like to give a special thank you to Dr. Peter S. Park for editing this post and for all our future collaborations!

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

We use evidence-based outreach to inform people of the threats that advanced AI poses to their economic livelihoods and personal safety (HOW). Our mission is to create a united front for humanity, driving national and international coordination on robust solutions to AI-driven disempowerment (WHAT).

I'm not sure if this was the aim of the mission statement, but after reading this I still do not know what StakeOut.AI does in a concrete way.

Thank you for your comment and feedback.

use evidence-based outreach to inform people of the threats that advanced AI poses to their economic livelihoods and personal safety

Specifically, we are looking to use cost-effective Internet messaging tools to communicate the evidence that disempowering AI poses serious dangers (to economic livelihoods and personal safety) for people of every industry, for people of every country, and for humanity as a whole.

Also, we plan to inform the public about incidents of AI-induced scams, propaganda, radicalization, etc. in order to convey the dangers posed by the ever-increasing capabilities of uncontrollable AI.

 

We did not specify the Internet-based messaging in the mission statement because we felt we would eventually use other mediums of messaging as well.

I guess according to the following principle:

Inclusivity & Specificity: Be broad enough to allow for the organization's growth and change but specific enough to provide clear direction

We stayed on the side of more broad because we felt 'outreach' was specific enough to provide the direction of the organization (regardless of medium).

 

Your feedback is invaluable, and getting EAs feedback is one of the primary reasons why we created the post sequence. So, thank you for your help.

Specifically, we are looking to use cost-effective Internet messaging tools to communicate the evidence that disempowering AI poses serious dangers (to economic livelihoods and personal safety) for people of every industry, for people of every country, and for humanity as a whole.

Thanks for clarifying, I can see why you'd want to make your mission statement broad enough to encompass future activity.

What "cost-effective Internet messaging tools" do you imagine you will be using in the near future?

My background is online marketing and we plan to test a wide range of online traffic methods including video, social, paid, and organic channels to attract people's attention on what already happened to certain professions (artists, journalists, actors, and writers) and incidents of AI-induced scams, propaganda, radicalization, etc.

We plan to run a pilot to confirm proof of concept. To achieve this, we intend to create a marketing funnel and run targeted ads in the target country.

Micro-pilot testing will be done on different target audiences before full pilot is carried out. This will also provide a better view of objections and misunderstandings of AI risks from the general public’s perspective.

We hope to publish a post next week titled "Introducing StakeOut.AI (Public Awareness of the Threats Posed by Advanced AI)" to share more about our project and plans.

Curated and popular this week
abrahamrowe
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
This is a Draft Amnesty Week draft. It may not be polished, up to my usual standards, fully thought through, or fully fact-checked.  Commenting and feedback guidelines:  I'm posting this to get it out there. I'd love to see comments that take the ideas forward, but criticism of my argument won't be as useful at this time, in part because I won't do any further work on it. This is a post I drafted in November 2023, then updated for an hour in March 2025. I don’t think I’ll ever finish it so I am just leaving it in this draft form for draft amnesty week (I know I'm late). I don’t think it is particularly well calibrated, but mainly just makes a bunch of points that I haven’t seen assembled elsewhere. Please take it as extremely low-confidence and there being a low-likelihood of this post describing these dynamics perfectly. I’ve worked at both EA charities and non-EA charities, and the EA funding landscape is unlike any other I’ve ever been in. This can be good — funders are often willing to take high-risk, high-reward bets on projects that might otherwise never get funded, and the amount of friction for getting funding is significantly lower. But, there is an orientation toward funders (and in particular staff at some major funders), that seems extremely unusual for charitable communities: a high degree of deference to their opinions. As a reference, most other charitable communities I’ve worked in have viewed funders in a much more mixed light. Engaging with them is necessary, yes, but usually funders (including large, thoughtful foundations like Open Philanthropy) are viewed as… an unaligned third party who is instrumentally useful to your organization, but whose opinions on your work should hold relatively little or no weight, given that they are a non-expert on the direct work, and often have bad ideas about how to do what you are doing. I think there are many good reasons to take funders’ perspectives seriously, and I mostly won’t cover these here. But, to
Dorothy M.
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
If you don’t typically engage with politics/government, this is the time to do so. If you are American and/or based in the U.S., reaching out to lawmakers, supporting organizations that are mobilizing on this issue, and helping amplify the urgency of this crisis can make a difference. Why this matters: 1. Millions of lives are at stake 2. Decades of progress, and prior investment, in global health and wellbeing are at risk 3. Government funding multiplies the impact of philanthropy Where things stand today (February 27, 2025) The Trump Administration’s foreign aid freeze has taken a catastrophic turn: rather than complying with a court order to restart paused funding, they have chosen to terminate more than 90% of all USAID grants and contracts. This stunningly reckless decision comes just 30 days into a supposed 90-day review of foreign aid. This will cause a devastating loss of life. Even beyond the immediate deaths, the long-term consequences are dire. Many of these programs rely on supply chains, health worker training, and community trust that have taken years to build, and which have already been harmed by U.S. actions in recent weeks. Further disruptions will actively unravel decades of health infrastructure development in low-income countries. While some funding may theoretically remain available, the reality is grim: the main USAID payment system remains offline and most staff capable of restarting programs have been laid off. Many people don’t believe these terminations were carried out legally. But NGOs and implementing partners are on the brink of bankruptcy and insolvency because the government has not paid them for work completed months ago and is withholding funding for ongoing work (including not transferring funds and not giving access to drawdowns of lines of credit, as is typical for some awards). We are facing a sweeping and permanent shutdown of many of the most cost-effective global health and development programs in existence that sa
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
Written anonymously because I work in a field where there is a currently low but non-negligible and possibly high future risk of negative consequences for criticizing Trump and Trumpism. This post is an attempt to cobble together some ideas about the current situation in the United States and its impact on EA. I invite discussion on this, not only from Americans, but also those with advocacy experience in countries that are not fully liberal democracies (especially those countries where state capacity is substantial and autocratic repression occurs).  I've deleted a lot of text from this post in various drafts because I find myself getting way too in the weeds discoursing on comparative authoritarian studies, disinformation and misinformation (this is a great intro, though already somewhat outdated), and the dangers of the GOP.[1] I will note that I worry there is still a tendency to view the administration as chaotic and clumsy but retaining some degree of good faith, which strikes me as quite naive.  For the sake of brevity and focus, I will take these two things to be true, and try to hypothesize what they mean for EA. I'm not going to pretend these are ironclad truths, but I'm fairly confident in them.[2]  1. Under Donald Trump, the Republican Party (GOP) is no longer substantially committed to democracy and the rule of law. 1. The GOP will almost certainly continue to engage in measures that test the limits of constitutional rule as long as Trump is alive, and likely after he dies. 2. The Democratic Party will remain constrained by institutional and coalition factors that prevent it from behaving like the GOP. That is, absent overwhelming electoral victories in 2024 and 2026 (and beyond), the Democrats' comparatively greater commitment to rule of law and democracy will prevent systematic purging of the GOP elites responsible for democratic backsliding; while we have not crossed the Rubicon yet, it will get much worse before things get better. 2. T