Executive summary: ALLFED provides an update on their research, policy, and technology development work related to increasing resilience against catastrophic global food system shocks like nuclear winter. They request funding for specific projects to expand their research and implementation efforts.
Key points:
Research is focused on modeling responses to nuclear winter crop loss, infrastructure collapse scenarios, and combination catastrophes. Funding sought for infrastructure resilience and target region planning.
Policy work involves translating research into national preparedness plans. Funding would expand engagements in the US, Australia, Argentina and other regions.
Technology involves developing open source solutions to food production bottlenecks. Funding sought for extruders, rope twisters, small scale plants.
Overall goal is to increase global resilience against catastrophic crop loss from nuclear war, pandemic infrastructure collapse, or other global shocks.
Funding needs estimated at $300k-$500k for research, $10k-$100k for policy, and $160k-$250k for technology pilots.
Volunteers also sought, including for ALLFED's board.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, andcontact us if you have feedback.
Over the last 12 months, there has been a general shift of ALLFED’s resources towards policy engagement and advocacy to increase humanity’s resilience against a potential global catastrophic food failure. Increasing geopolitical tensions have compelled us to expedite the translation of our scientific research into actionable policy. Examples include our reports outlining the content of national preparedness and response plans against abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios (e.g. nuclear winter) for various countries such as the United States, Australia, and Argentina.
We will continue to work on all three pillars of ALLFED’s work: research, policy, and technology development.
Projects: where is marginal funding likely to be spent?
Research: previous funding will enable ALLFED to continue work in a large project to create an integrated assessment model of food system responses to counter yield losses of full-scale nuclear winter-level (150 Tg soot, global average calorie production from crops would decrease by ~80-90%). We are in the process of publishing the firstsets of results. Previous funding will also allow us to continue key priority research projects on the topic of resilient foods for nuclear winter-level shocks. In this funding appeal we would instead like to ask for support to:
Overhaul our more neglected line of research. Specifically, research into interventions to increase resilience and response capabilities to scenarios involving extreme, abrupt collapse of critical infrastructure (e.g. loss of electricity/industry), which could be caused by an extreme pandemic resulting in employees in critical industries being too fearful to report to work. This would also involve designing a resilient backup communication system (such as a resilient satellite that could communicate directly with cell phones). Previously we proposed using draft animals for farming and transportation, but we are now investigating wood gasification that was used in WWII to substitute for petroleum products. This would also involve defining how an effective resilient food response to this scenario would look, and developing the required methods and tool designs to achieve it. We estimate the need as ~3 FTE with support ($300,000).
Maintaining our researchers to carry out other priority projects. For example, research on combination scenarios is crucial to understand not only how to prevent humanity from surviving a most extreme scenario involving a global food production collapse combined with a loss of global industry and supply chains (e.g. via a full-scale nuclear war involving coordinated nuclear EMP attacks), but also how to best help regions likely to be a target of nuclear attacks in a war, such as the USA and the European Union (where nuclear EMP is very likely even if it does not take place globally). We’ve estimated a requirement of ~5 additional FTE including research, operations, etc. to kickstart this ($500,000).
Translation of research into policy:
Additional funding will be used to:
Support existing policy engagements in the USA, Australia and Argentina.
Kickstart a new regional preparedness planning project in a key region (e.g. Scandinavia, New Zealand, Persian Gulf). A basic plan can be done for $10,000 with limited engagement - more customization and greater engagement is more like $100,000.
Translation of research into resilient tech development: We are also looking for funding to perform a modest (~$200,000) technology demonstration of a key resilient food technology from our list of tech ideas that address current bottlenecks, e.g. an open source extruder for greenhouse cover production for fast scaling, or open source rope twister for seaweed.
Pilot
Total cost (including overhead)
Breakdown
Completion time
Simple greenhouse prototype for fast scaling (Open Source (OS))
$160,000
2 FTE $75,000 each, $10,000 materials and supplies
12 months
Rope twister for seaweed (OS)
$170,000
1 FTE $75,000 each year
$20,000 materials and supplies
24 months
Plastic extruder for greenhouses (OS)
$250,000
1 FTE $75,000 each year
$100,000 materials and supplies
24 months
Repurposing of a small scale university paper pilot plant for production of sugar
~$2,200,000
3 FTE $100,000 each/year
$1,000,000 equipment
~48 months
Thank you
Thanks to all our donors and volunteers. Other than donating, you can also contribute your time through volunteering with ALLFED, including as a board member. Thank you for your interest and support in increasing the chances of humanity in the face of global catastrophic food failure.
This is a crosspost from the new Animal Welfare Alignment Newsletter by Anima International. You can subscribe on Substack if you are interested in following these efforts. Audio reading also available on Substack.
The goals of this post are to:
1. Raise a question I see as crucially important to the goal of aligning AI to animal welfare...
Hello! I'm Justin Portela. I got hired by GWWC to make YouTube videos after AI in Context did such a kickass job.
My channel is using that same cinematic, high-production value beauty to talk about everything in the EA universe that isn't AI.
...
This is a linkpost for Request for Proposals: Research and Applied Work on Digital Minds.
I'm glad to announce a request for proposals for research and applied work on digital minds at Longview Ph...
There is peer-reviewed literature estimating that this work is likely to be more cost-effective than GiveWell interventions for saving lives in the present generation, and likely more cost-effective than artificial general intelligence safety for improving the long run future (resilient foods and resilience to loss of electricity/industry).
Other independent or non-academic related evaluations of cost-effectiveness can be found here: