TLDR: We're a giving app that is buiding a 30 day journey in which users give to 30 different pre-selected highly effective charities. We want feedback on our initial list and ideas for additional charities we should consider.
Hi everyone,
I'm Joe, founder and Chair of EveryDrop SCIO. I've spent the last year and a half building a daily-giving app, and early last month we were finally awarded official charity status by the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR).
EveryDrop was founded on the concept that giving effectively can be a source of joy and fulfilment for everyone. Through the app, our users are presented with a daily learning journey which introduces them to the scale & importance of a new impact area and the incredible impact and progress being made by the day's spotlighted charity. If you're curious, you can see a 2-day demo of the platform here: https://everydrop-app-demo.pages.dev/ or check out our website here to join the waitlist: www.everydropapp.com
For our launch, we have decided to frame the app as a 30-day challenge.
Our app is built to integrate education, effective giving and positive psychology to build a habit of giving in everyone. We believe that daily giving can:
Inefficiency of small payments. We haven’t built EveryDrop to address donation efficiency. This obviously matters a lot, and there are already great organisations across the EA universe optimizing the delivery of funds to the impact areas that need it most.
We see ourselves as filling a different need. Our main objective is to help our users discover the feeling I had when I first learned about and engaged in effective giving:
Of course, I wouldn't be here if I thought effectiveness and efficiency didn't matter. Effectiveness remains the overarching criterion we have selected our featured charities on. But the spark I'm chasing with our users is agency and empowerment: the sense that a person can do something to make the world better, stronger, kinder, safer. And in doing that action, they are joining a wider community of committed givers.
The micro-donation structure comes with an obvious trade-off on payment-processing fees. We're working hard to keep the operation as efficient as possible, and we've already received an initial commitment from a private funder to cover transaction fees on the first £10,000 moved through the platform.
We're exploring several ways to minimize processing fees further: a shift from daily settlement to a pledge-then-settle model, where in-app payments are aggregated weekly; integration with PayPal Giving Fund infrastructure, which can substantially reduce UK processing costs; and a Direct Debit / bank-transfer (Faster Payments) set-up to move money at little cost.
While the ultimate payment method is still under consideration, we're confident that even in the worst case - where EveryDrop covers our users' processing fees on their behalf - it remains worthwhile: spending roughly £0.17 in fees to activate £1.20 of net-new donations to effective charities is about a 5x impact lever rather than just donating our own money directly to the charity.
Moral licensing. Studies show that acts of generosity increase the probability of future generous acts. We keep the daily amounts small precisely to avoid a sense of "having done enough". And the capped 30-day journey gives us a natural moment, at the conclusion, to present further action rather than closure. As the journey ends, the invitation is to go and do more, through GWWC or other long-term giving and community resources; resources from the School for Moral Ambition, 80,000 hours, and Probably Good are also considered for inclusion.
Crowding-out. "Crowding-out" here I meant that this habit displaces more, or better, giving that the user would otherwise have done were it not for this activity. Because we act as a pure conduit to vetted, effective charities and because our users are mostly people who weren't giving effectively, or at all, beforehand, we feel the risk is low, and our net impact will be toward more and better giving, not away from it.
New givers (by far our main targets). The target user is Gen-Z, mobile-first, at university or early in their career. They feel the weight of the world's problems, care about positive outcomes and they're looking for a way to actually do something about it, but they haven't yet found a foothold in effective giving or other morally ambitious output. They're digitally connected and influenced by what their peers do.
Large donors tied to passive, DAF-like structures who don't feel connected through the year to the causes they support. For them the donation itself is trivial, but the daily habit affirms their identity as a giver and can broaden their understanding of the different challenges we face.
Founders Pledge members who've committed to give big later in life but, in the meantime, don't have an outlet to stay connected to effective giving.
Effective altruists looking to share their priorities and passion in an accessible way with family and friends. EveryDropApp can serve as a low-cost, low-commitment conversation starter, rather than a competitor for long-term committed action.
The objective of this post is to solicit feedback on the charities we have selected to feature on our 30-day journey. The utility of every pound we move depends entirely on which charities we choose to feature. That's where we need your help. While we want to prioritize the effectiveness of every dollar, we also want to expose our users to a full range of inspirational charities that are doing tremendous work. Instead of trying to optimize every dollar, we are trying to curate a list that has the highest probability of having an ‘Aha!’ moment for users that discover a cause area and charity that awakens a sense of agency, urgency and action in our user. Our main ask in this post is to help us refine and expand our initial curated list.
One thing worth flagging: we're a UK-registered charity, so we can only fund charities that fall within a specific set of pre-determined charitable purposes — poverty, health, education, environment, animal welfare, human rights, and community development. Which means, frustratingly for this audience, that most longtermist and AI-safety giving is off-limits to us (we actually had to drop planned days on both). So anything you suggest needs to fit within those seven areas.
Here's the current line-up:
Poverty
Health
Education
Environment
Animal welfare
Human rights
Community / effective giving
What are we missing? I'd love to hear which charities you find most compelling, the ones that made you think "more people should know about this". I've got a soft spot for organisations that would make a brand-new giver feel that spark of what's possible — Justice Defenders is my touchstone there — not only the ones that top a cost-effectiveness table.
Thank you.
I like the idea and I think its a great list. Given the failure and sort-of scandal around Dispensers for Safe Water, you might want to consider whether its a bit of a risk on a big portfolio like this. Nice job :)
Thanks for the feedback. I’ll give the Dispensers for Safe Water another look. I knew they’d had some issues with overestimations but will dig into it more. Any recommendations for an alternative to consider