Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Charles He7
0
0

I'm not sure this is directly addressing the questions, but this might be useful to onlookers?

There is currently a sense at major established animal welfare orgs (headcount >30 people), that it's hard to recruit "tech" talent:

  • The situation is much less the need for strong senior generalist engineers that can build complex systems (skillsets that would be useful at Anthropic), but just data or tech savvy specialists who can work with systems like CRMs, websites and integrate them well.
  • It's unclear how much this affects impact. There is some sense of "streetlamp"  effects (e.g. middle/senior leaders say, we might do things better and save a lot of time if we had someone else look at this and build a system).
  • Based on the existence of this sentiment, presumably, an outside agency isn't entirely adequate, I'm guessing for the normal reasons?:
    • Automating processes well takes a lot of ownership and investment, both from the engineer and from the organization, so an internal hire is best.
    • Pretty much every EA is competent, there's a lot of tech services out there, and half-good solutions are probably common. It's getting it to the next level that is needed, and this level of quality and focus on the user is harder to achieve.

The root issues:

  • Might be pretty mundane and related to the extreme demand for any experienced software talent globally. Any serious tech entity has a powerful and effective recruiting arm and large salaries.
  • Despite the pedigree,  I suspect EA has a much weaker talent flow of dev and engineers than it seems

Solutions:

Maybe just day dreaming, but a reasonable solution might be having strong developers (or even junior with good taste and communication) move across a few orgs and talk to people to see what need there is, and then lay out a plan. 

The key is for this person not to use a lot of exec or leadership time, yet have strong perspective and high signal to noise and be trusted by junior and middle managers. This is a rarer skill and in demand, but there's probably many EAs who could do this.

It would be totally worth getting EAIF money for this, as the general lessons and knowledge would be useful to everyone (many EA orgs are small and would benefit from perspective).

Reply
5
Eevee🔹
Yeah, I agree that recruitment and compensation are major obstacles. For example, Mercy for Animals is currently hiring a global director of data and analytics, and are willing to pay up to $87,000 in salary. This role involves more responsibility than I currently have for half of my current total comp. In writing this post, however, I was hoping that there'd be potential roles for volunteers. On the other hand, my impression is that AI safety orgs pay software and ML engineers competitively, because these are their core competencies.
Charles He4
0
0

This is really well said, thanks for laying out your perspective in searching for volunteers.

Reply
4
Charles He
Another, long term solution is broad and big picture, and is definitely day dreaming, but important:  There could be a major project that focuses on building a strong generalist EA software community (by deliberating hiring and stocking a pool of mentors, generalists, and paying large salaries).  This would be useful to build up a strong culture that consistently attracts SWE of high quality to EA. This supporting newer and growing organizations, for example, supporting nascent and growing AI orgs.  * This is hard(er) to do, but extremely valuable (impact of a good version probably over $100M, justifying significant up front investment) * It's probably generalist software talent that is limiting at AI orgs, and it seems like this won't change for the next few years * To calibrate, several orgs are paying hundreds and some over 7 figures for generalist software talent right now. This comp is only one thing that attracts talent, and creating these conditions is hard * The corollary is that, this talent allocation, not forum writing, not cause prioritization, decides the fate of much object level work.
See in context
by Eevee🔹
1 min readNo answers 11

37

Animal welfareData scienceFarmed animal welfarePublic interest technologyRequests (open)Software engineeringWild animal welfare
Frontpage

TL;DR: If you are part of or know of an EA animal welfare organization, please comment with pain points you have or know about that could be solved with software or data science.

Please have a low bar for posting - if it would improve animal welfare or help animal welfare orgs increase their impact, and someone would probably pay $50 to solve it, please post it here. For example, maybe there's a boring task you'd like to automate? Some data you'd like to analyze?

If you use an existing software application to solve a problem, such as Salesforce, please describe the software program and any shortcomings it has that limit your impact, to serve as inspiration for applications that could replace it or be used with it (such as plugins).

Why I'm asking: I'm a machine learning engineer interested in doing software engineering or data science work related to animal welfare in the future. I'm sure there are others like me in this community who are looking for projects to do and would benefit from a collection of ideas.

Inspired by: What Are Your Software Needs? by Yonatan Cale, A list of technical EA projects by Hazelfire

37

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment
Comments11
Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
anishazaveri17
0
0

There is a list here where I see "Front-end web development" and "back-end web development

Reply
MichaelStJules4
0
0

You can also use filters on their job board, in case there's anything there: https://www.animaladvocacycareers.org/job-board

Reply
Eevee🔹2
0
0

Oh, this is nice! But it's organized in a weird way - not by organization or job listing, but by skill first with the list of orgs seeking each skill next to it.

Reply
Jamie_Harris4
0
0

I agree it's "weird" in the sense of "unusual", but it you mean "weird" in the sense of "unhelpful", I'd be very grateful if you're happy to elaborate why you'd prefer it the other way around!

Reply
Eevee🔹2
0
0

It's unusual and helpful!

Reply
Eevee🔹10
0
0

Vegan Hacktivists is a group that does software projects for animal advocacy orgs. These are their current projects.

Reply
Charles He7
0
0

I'm not sure this is directly addressing the questions, but this might be useful to onlookers?

There is currently a sense at major established animal welfare orgs (headcount >30 people), that it's hard to recruit "tech" talent:

  • The situation is much less the need for strong senior generalist engineers that can build complex systems (skillsets that would be useful at Anthropic), but just data or tech savvy specialists who can work with systems like CRMs, websites and integrate them well.
  • It's unclear how much this affects impact. There is some sense of "streetlamp"  effects (e.g. middle/senior leaders say, we might do things better and save a lot of time if we had someone else look at this and build a system).
  • Based on the existence of this sentiment, presumably, an outside agency isn't entirely adequate, I'm guessing for the normal reasons?:
    • Automating processes well takes a lot of ownership and investment, both from the engineer and from the organization, so an internal hire is best.
    • Pretty much every EA is competent, there's a lot of tech services out there, and half-good solutions are probably common. It's getting it to the next level that is needed, and this level of quality and focus on the user is harder to achieve.

The root issues:

  • Might be pretty mundane and related to the extreme demand for any experienced software talent globally. Any serious tech entity has a powerful and effective recruiting arm and large salaries.
  • Despite the pedigree,  I suspect EA has a much weaker talent flow of dev and engineers than it seems

Solutions:

Maybe just day dreaming, but a reasonable solution might be having strong developers (or even junior with good taste and communication) move across a few orgs and talk to people to see what need there is, and then lay out a plan. 

The key is for this person not to use a lot of exec or leadership time, yet have strong perspective and high signal to noise and be trusted by junior and middle managers. This is a rarer skill and in demand, but there's probably many EAs who could do this.

It would be totally worth getting EAIF money for this, as the general lessons and knowledge would be useful to everyone (many EA orgs are small and would benefit from perspective).

Reply
Eevee🔹5
0
0

Yeah, I agree that recruitment and compensation are major obstacles. For example, Mercy for Animals is currently hiring a global director of data and analytics, and are willing to pay up to $87,000 in salary. This role involves more responsibility than I currently have for half of my current total comp. In writing this post, however, I was hoping that there'd be potential roles for volunteers.

On the other hand, my impression is that AI safety orgs pay software and ML engineers competitively, because these are their core competencies.

Reply
Charles He4
0
0

This is really well said, thanks for laying out your perspective in searching for volunteers.

Reply
Charles He4
0
0

Another, long term solution is broad and big picture, and is definitely day dreaming, but important: 

There could be a major project that focuses on building a strong generalist EA software community (by deliberating hiring and stocking a pool of mentors, generalists, and paying large salaries). 

This would be useful to build up a strong culture that consistently attracts SWE of high quality to EA. This supporting newer and growing organizations, for example, supporting nascent and growing AI orgs. 

  • This is hard(er) to do, but extremely valuable (impact of a good version probably over $100M, justifying significant up front investment)
  • It's probably generalist software talent that is limiting at AI orgs, and it seems like this won't change for the next few years
  • To calibrate, several orgs are paying hundreds and some over 7 figures for generalist software talent right now. This comp is only one thing that attracts talent, and creating these conditions is hard
    • The corollary is that, this talent allocation, not forum writing, not cause prioritization, decides the fate of much object level work.
Reply
Anna Travinskaia3
0
0

 Hi, this is awesome that technology professionals like you are thinking about supporting animal welfare movement. Coincidentally, Vegan Hacktivists (VH) are actually collecting data on the state of technology in the animal protection movement at the moment (until the end of September 2022).  Their goal is to identify the needs as well. You might be interested to check out their report when the study is done. Also, if people reading this are part of an animal-focused organisation it would be very helpful to partake in this research.  VH is looking for one person (ideally, someone who is knowledgable about org culture, leadership, strategy, and tech) from each organisation to complete this survey: https://veganhacktivists.org/research

Reply
More from Eevee🔹
View more
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities
View more