Hide table of contents

TLDR: We are excited to announce that applications are now open for the EAGxPrague!
(Skip to content.)

Apply now

 

We’d love to welcome you back to meet in-person in Europe - to reconnect with friends, meet new people, explore impactful opportunities, and engage with the latest thinking in effective altruism.

 

Who is this for?

EAGxPrague is ideal for anyone trying to apply  EA principles in their projects, careers, volunteering, or donations.

Unlike global EAG conferences, this event welcomes participants with varying levels of experience—even those newer to effective altruism.

Our primary audience is community members and supporters from Central and Eastern Europe, but we welcome seasoned EA participants from across Europe and neighbouring regions who would like to share their knowledge with newcomers.

 

What to expect?

 👥 Great Conversations

Past attendees have reported that one-on-one meetings were the most valuable part of the event. To enhance networking, we use a conference app where you can discover other participants and find people who can answer your most pressing questions.

Check out How to Get the Maximum Value Out of Effective Altruism Conferences, and take some time to reflect on your mission in advance.

 

💼 Opportunities You Won’t Find Elsewhere

While some ways to make an impact are well-known, many impactful careers and projects arise unexpectedly.
At Friday’s Opportunity Fair, you’ll have a chance to connect with multiple organizations and projects in one place—perhaps discovering a cause or collaboration that aligns with your interests.

 

🧑‍🔬 Experts Addressing Key Questions and Impactful Tools

We’ve invited speakers from around the world to lead talks, workshops, discussions, and meetups. (See below for a list of topics).

Follow your curiosity—join office hours with our speakers or schedule a meeting to explore key topics in depth. Our workshops are designed to equip you with critical thinking tools and practical skills to advance your projects.

 

📜 Better Resources for Your Next Steps

If you’re passionate about a project, it’s likely that someone has worked on something similar before.
We strive to create a collaborative environment with multiple channels for sharing the latest reports, papers, and expert insights. If you don’t find the right person for a 1:1 meeting, we’ll help connect you with relevant resources.

 

💆‍♀️ Balanced environment

We recognize that EA conferences can be intense, so we’re committed to promoting ambition, curiosity, and exploration, while also prioritizing balance

To support well-being, we’re offering guided tours of Prague, a nap room, a tea room, and other relaxing activities.

Arrive early to explore Prague and connect with the Czech EA community—exciting satellite events are being planned!

Sharpen your tools for impact

Our program includes traditional EA cause areas:

  • AI Safety and Governance: Delving into the technical and philosophical dimensions of AI safety and governance.
  • Animal Welfare: Addressing the immense suffering of animals in factory farms, where trillions endure harsh conditions.

Other key topics include Biosecurity, Global Health, Effective Giving, Global Priorities Research, and Improving Institutional Decision-Making.

You can also explore region-specific topics, such as AI’s impact on democracy.
Totalitarianism amplifies other global risks. It can also lead to dystopian scenarios where AI-powered surveillance entrenches authoritarian regimes and heightens the risk of global conflicts.

Speakers to be announced.

 

We have carefully selected workshops designed to empower you on your path to impact. You can look forward to:

  • 🔎 Theory of Change Workshop
  • 🎤 Communicating Complex Ideas Workshop
  • 🖋 Writing Workshop

Reserve your spot early by booking via Swapcard (available in April).

 

Pricing & Travel Support

The event is free, but we kindly ask for donations based on your financial situation (£0–£300). The standard donation to help cover event costs is £70.

Travel reimbursement

We offer travel support for those who wouldn’t be able to attend otherwise.

Funds are limited, so please only request funding only if necessary. Your funding request won’t affect your application outcome.

For more details, see our travel policy.

 

Apply now

⏳ Final application deadline: Friday, April 18

Don’t miss this chance to discuss ideas, hear ambitious plans, and make intellectual progress.
We look forward to seeing you at EAGxPrague!

 

Apply now

 

-- Hana, Radek, Richard, Jiri, Szymon, Irena, Linh & others

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Really excited to see EAGx return to Prague!

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f