This is a summary of a report on perinatal mental health, created by Stan Pinsent of CEARCH on behalf of the Flourishing Minds Fund. CEARCH is a philanthropic research and grantmaking organization, identifying highly impactful philanthropic causes and working to support them with additional funding and talent.

Perinatal mental illness, primarily depression and anxiety, affects an estimated 10-20% of pregnant women and new mothers globally. It is linked to increased rates of stillbirth and preterm birth, and can impair the mother's ability to bond with and care for her child. It may cause developmental problems in the infant that persist into adulthood.

While afflicted, women experience low mood, low self-esteem and an elevated risk of self-harm and suicide. Widespread stigma around mental illness means that these women often suffer in silence.

The burden is slightly higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), disproportionately affecting vulnerable and disadvantaged women. Although there is unmet need everywhere, low-income countries typically have 50x fewer mental health professionals per capita than high-income countries, and perinatal mental illness often goes completely ignored. This, and the lower cost of providing treatment in these countries, means that most of the promising opportunities are in LMICs.

Recent decades have seen significant improvement in Maternal and Neonatal Health (MNH) outcomes, but not in Perinatal Mental Health (PMH). We expect PMH to continue to grow as a share of the health burden in LMICs .

Fig. 1: The burden of perinatal mental illness is decreasing more slowly than other maternal and neonatal disorders[1].

Layperson-delivered Interpersonal Group Therapy (IPT-G) is widely considered to be an effective way to scale-up access to mental health treatments in low-income countries, and probably has a role in tackling perinatal mental illnessThere are also opportunities to improve physical and mental health in tandem, such as through Participatory Action and Learning (PLA) groups, which can bring communities together to share knowledge and to support mothers. It has been claimed that when well-attended, these community interventions can avert maternal and infant deaths for around $1,000 each[2].

Interventions in this space face the challenge of reaching pregnant women and mothers who are often physically and socially marginalized. This can be done by:

  • Attaching to existing services like midwife care or anti-poverty programs to engage women in hard-to-reach places. Grant funding can help to scale up such approaches or fund studies on the effectiveness of new initiatives.
  • Utilizing technology. Internet access is spreading rapidly, increasing the feasibility of interventions like self-help apps or online psychotherapy. Apps and online courses can train health care workers to identify and treat perinatal mental illness. We are optimistic that well-directed grants could advance organizations in this space from concept to impact.
  • Preventing Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) through “edutainment” campaigns or by pushing for improved women’s property rights. This is a largely untested space which could prove to be a major lever in preventing perinatal mental illness.

Fig. 2: IHME estimates that women who have experienced IPV at any point in their life are 1.54x more likely to experience major depressive disorder.

There may be opportunities for small, high-impact research grants of $100k-$200k that contribute to the global effort to improve PMH. We are particularly excited to see:

  • Research on the effectiveness of new treatments
  • Efforts to determine the secondary effects of mental health interventions on child development and on maternal outcomes beyond mental health.
  • Analysis that informs future grantmaking by addressing some of our key uncertainties.

This report is the first stage of a process that will conclude with a seven-figure grant portfolio to address perinatal mental illness. 

The full report on perinatal mental health can be found here.

A summary of my previous report on mental health interventions can be found here.

  1. ^

    All figures are calculated “per birth”. In the absence of better data, the "total mental health burden among women aged 15-39 divided by the birth rate" is used as a proxy for the burden of perinatal mental illness.

  2. ^
Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

This is great work Stan, as a former religious network builder, now not religious and entering the space of scaling of lay-therapy in LMICs, I can see developing partnerships with religions and parachurch networks in LMICs to give use of their properties for community Mental Health Care (MHC), as well as helping them further their own versions, usually called spiritual counseling, in line with good science. In the USA this marriage is common and a significant percentage of the total MHC given the entire US population is done by religious org's, a reality not well understood by secular professional communities. This won't be my main modality, but leave no stone unturned.

I'm interested in many new therapeutic methods not even included in your report, that are just yet to be invented or perfected. I'm excited about the recent Australian BMJ Meta Analysis of Exercise interventions for depression that found dance to be more effective than any of the exercise types, as well as beating both SSRI's and CBT...unfortunately a small sample size that needs more study, but still amazing. We will certainly run pilots on that in our new work. 

Jeffrey Kursonis

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
I wrote this to try to explain the key thing going on with AI right now to a broader audience. Feedback welcome. Most people think of AI as a pattern-matching chatbot – good at writing emails, terrible at real thinking. They've missed something huge. In 2024, while many declared AI was reaching a plateau, it was actually entering a new paradigm: learning to reason using reinforcement learning. This approach isn’t limited by data, so could deliver beyond-human capabilities in coding and scientific reasoning within two years. Here's a simple introduction to how it works, and why it's the most important development that most people have missed. The new paradigm: reinforcement learning People sometimes say “chatGPT is just next token prediction on the internet”. But that’s never been quite true. Raw next token prediction produces outputs that are regularly crazy. GPT only became useful with the addition of what’s called “reinforcement learning from human feedback” (RLHF): 1. The model produces outputs 2. Humans rate those outputs for helpfulness 3. The model is adjusted in a way expected to get a higher rating A model that’s under RLHF hasn’t been trained only to predict next tokens, it’s been trained to produce whatever output is most helpful to human raters. Think of the initial large language model (LLM) as containing a foundation of knowledge and concepts. Reinforcement learning is what enables that structure to be turned to a specific end. Now AI companies are using reinforcement learning in a powerful new way – training models to reason step-by-step: 1. Show the model a problem like a math puzzle. 2. Ask it to produce a chain of reasoning to solve the problem (“chain of thought”).[1] 3. If the answer is correct, adjust the model to be more like that (“reinforcement”).[2] 4. Repeat thousands of times. Before 2023 this didn’t seem to work. If each step of reasoning is too unreliable, then the chains quickly go wrong. Without getting close to co
JamesÖz
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
Why it’s important to fill out this consultation The UK Government is currently consulting on allowing insects to be fed to chickens and pigs. This is worrying as the government explicitly says changes would “enable investment in the insect protein sector”. Given the likely sentience of insects (see this summary of recent research), and that median predictions estimate that 3.9 trillion insects will be killed annually by 2030, we think it’s crucial to try to limit this huge source of animal suffering.  Overview * Link to complete the consultation: HERE. You can see the context of the consultation here. * How long it takes to fill it out: 5-10 minutes (5 questions total with only 1 of them requiring a written answer) * Deadline to respond: April 1st 2025 * What else you can do: Share the consultation document far and wide!  * You can use the UK Voters for Animals GPT to help draft your responses. * If you want to hear about other high-impact ways to use your political voice to help animals, sign up for the UK Voters for Animals newsletter. There is an option to be contacted only for very time-sensitive opportunities like this one, which we expect will happen less than 6 times a year. See guidance on submitting in a Google Doc Questions and suggested responses: It is helpful to have a lot of variation between responses. As such, please feel free to add your own reasoning for your responses or, in addition to animal welfare reasons for opposing insects as feed, include non-animal welfare reasons e.g., health implications, concerns about farming intensification, or the climate implications of using insects for feed.    Question 7 on the consultation: Do you agree with allowing poultry processed animal protein in porcine feed?  Suggested response: No (up to you if you want to elaborate further).  We think it’s useful to say no to all questions in the consultation, particularly as changing these rules means that meat producers can make more profit from sel
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
 The Life You Can Save, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting extreme poverty, and Founders Pledge, a global nonprofit empowering entrepreneurs to do the most good possible with their charitable giving, have announced today the formation of their Rapid Response Fund. In the face of imminent federal funding cuts, the Fund will ensure that some of the world's highest-impact charities and programs can continue to function. Affected organizations include those offering critical interventions, particularly in basic health services, maternal and child health, infectious disease control, mental health, domestic violence, and organized crime.