Every few years (2020, 2018, 2016, 2014) I like to look over our spending and write something up publicly. General advantages of being public here:

  • This gives something I can point people to if they have questions about some aspect of how we handle money.

  • Since almost everything we do either earns or costs money it can be a good overview of our current life situation.

  • It helps others get a sense of how much things cost.

  • It lets us see if our spending is changing in ways we might not want, etc.

This time around, now that I'm no longer earning to give, I'm thinking a lot about whether and how this should affect our spending.

Let's start with the monthly numbers in the same format as last time. They're either for the whole of 2021 (ex: housing costs) or what we were doing at the end of the year (ex: childcare), whichever gives a more consistent picture. I'm still using the same amortized approach for housing I started in 2018.

  • Donations: $33k (51% of 2021 adjusted gross income)
  • Taxes: $14k
    • Income tax: $7.2k
    • State tax: $3.2k
    • Social Security tax: $1.6k
    • Medicare tax: $1.3k
    • Property tax: $708
  • Childcare: $5.5k ($250/workday, three kids; $830 pre-tax)
  • Housing: $3.7k
    • One time expenses (all time)
      • Purchase and all one-time expenses included last time: $1,091k
      • Shed renovation: $17k
      • Roof leak: $2.5k
      • Furnace work: $1k
    • Ongoing expenses, all whole-house (including tenants' unit):
      • Other: $373
      • Electricity: $190
      • Water/Sewer: $117
      • Gas (Heat): $158
    • Rent income: $3.2k
  • Retirement saving: $4k ($1,625 pre-tax, the rest is after-tax 401k contributions)
  • Other savings: $2.5k
  • Medical: $1.3k (all pre-tax)
  • Food: $668 (two adults, two kids, one infant)
  • Other: $1k
    • Includes phone bills, taxis, car rentals, clothes, vacation, stuff for the kids, and other smaller expenses.
    • Because we are no longer tracking our expenses to the dollar, the distinction between "Other" and "Savings" is an estimate.
    • I've doubled this since last time based on a vague guess that we're spending more here.
Category pre-tax post-tax total
Donations $0 $33,000 $33,000
Retirement $1,625 $2,375 $4,000
Taxes $0 $14,000 $14,000
Housing $0 $3,700 $3,700
Savings $0 $2,500 $2,500
Childcare $800 $4,700 $5,500
Medical $1,300 0 $1,300
Food $0 $668 $668
Other $0 $1,000 $1,000

Comparing to previous years:

2022 2020 2018 2016
Donations $33,000 $19,600 $11,800 $12,200
Savings $6,500 $7,700 $1,500 $1,500
Taxes $14,000 $4,400 $4,150 $4,140
Housing $3,700 $3,230 $2,750 $1,870
Childcare $5,500 $2,750 $1,700 $3,470
Medical $1,300 $1,280 $950 $370
Food $688 $750 $750 $230
Other $1,000 $500 $1,120 $295

One thing that jumps out is the large increase in taxes, but it's about what you'd expect given the increase in our income and the effect of progressive taxation. Here's the last ten years of income and taxes (note separate left and right axes):

When I write this post in 2024, what do I expect to be saying?

  • Donations will be down a lot, because I'm no longer earning to give. I haven't decided yet what rate I want to donate now, if at all. I switched roles because I thought my new work would be more valuable than my donations had been, and I'm now making about a quarter of what I made at Google, so there's a sense in which which means I'm effectively 'donating' 75%. While GWWC doesn't count this I'm not convinced that's the right way to handle it. Still thinking on this, and on what sort of EA culture I'd like encourage here.

  • Savings will be down a lot. Most of our savings were for retirement, and we now have about $600k saved. If we earn a real annual return of 2% over the next 30y (pretty conservative) and retire at 67 then withdrawing 4% a year would be $42k. Combined with us owning our house and being able to rent out parts of it, I'm not planning to put more into our 401k for now.

  • Taxes will be down a lot; our income will be much lower.

  • Housing should be about the same. One of our housemates is moving out, but we'll be looking for another.

  • Childcare should be similar to this year, and will be the largest component of our budget. Our former au pair is now back with the kids as a nanny, and while she's wonderful it's a much more expensive arrangement. It's possible that at some point she might move on, or we might need to switch to something else to save money. This cost should go down in Fall 2026 when our youngest starts Kindergarten, though at that point it's only six more years until 2032 when our oldest starts college.

  • Other expenses should be similar, though they will be a larger fraction of the budget and we may focus on them more.

Comments3


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

This is really inspiring. I love the openness about your income and spending. The amount you donate is incredible. I don't know how you lived on $688 for food for a year.

I don't know how you lived on $688 for food for a year.

These are monthly numbers, which makes the donated amount significantly more impressive!

There are psychopath and sociopath personality type people who go into the non-profit and charity sector to grift off of the donations, and usually you would never know unless you knew these people and investigated them behind the scenes. The usual CPA audits of non-profits do not detect this type of fraud, so keep in mind that most people who work or run charities just end up pocketing most of the money, sometimes even the official numbers are like 90% going toward official advertising and administration, but then unofficially they can grift through check fraud, kick backs from contractors, diversion of the things the funds were spent on, etc. They are smart and make it look so good on the surface and even to an audit that you would never know, unless you worked with these people for a long time and observed them. So if you are donating to a charity, chances are that only 10% of your donation reaches the target, while most of your donation may be going toward funding the charity's workers' real estate side business, SUV, kid college, etc. I'm speaking from experience working in official non-profits and speaking with people who worked inside charities such as breast cancer charity, affordable & homeless housing, etc in the Boston area and in the US. 

Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
Joris 🔸
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Last week, I participated in Animal Advocacy Careers’ Impactful Policy Careers programme. Below I’m sharing some reflections on what was a really interesting week in Brussels! Please note I spent just one week there, so take it all with a grain of (CAP-subsidized) salt. Posts like this and this one are probably much more informative (and assume less context). I mainly wrote this to reflect on my time in Brussels (and I capped it at 2 hours, so it’s not a super polished draft). I’ll focus mostly on EU careers generally, less on (EU) animal welfare-related careers. Before I jump in, just a quick note about how I think AAC did something really cool here: they identified a relatively underexplored area where it’s relatively easy for animal advocates to find impactful roles, and then designed a programme to help these people better understand that area, meet stakeholders, and learn how to find roles. I also think the participants developed meaningful bonds, which could prove valuable over time. Thank you to the AAC team for hosting this! On EU careers generally * The EU has a surprisingly big influence over its citizens and the wider world for how neglected it came across to me. There’s many areas where countries have basically given a bunch (if not all) of their decision making power to the EU. And despite that, the EU policy making / politics bubble comes across as relatively neglected, with relatively little media coverage and a relatively small bureaucracy. * There’s quite a lot of pathways into the Brussels bubble, but all have different ToCs, demand different skill sets, and prefer different backgrounds. Dissecting these is hard, and time-intensive * For context, I have always been interested in “a career in policy/politics” – I now realize that’s kind of ridiculously broad. I’m happy to have gained some clarity on the differences between roles in Parliament, work at the Commission, the Council, lobbying, consultancy work, and think tanks. * The absorbe
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read