Thanks a lot for writing this up, it'll be useful in my work for planning projects to help people get into the field :) Could you point me to the alternative model that you mentioned in the limitations?
I propose a model to think about on-ramps into biosecurity & provide a few use cases for it depending on the background you are coming in with.
I provide an overview of how different organisations in this space fit into the model.
If you are an undergrad check the "I'm new to Biosecurity, where do I start?".
A common problem
When I first heard about biosecurity I was excited by the 80,000 hours podcast and impressed by the work of Kevin Esvelt, RAND and NTI. Even though I was studying molecular biology, a seemingly relevant subject I couldn’t see a way for me to get involved and to find a full-time role in this field. The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in biosecurity felt huge.
Figure 1: The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in the field.
A proposed on-ramp model
Through my experiences with reading groups, UC Berkeley EA, SERI BITS and now the Oxford Biosecurity Group I have found that working on short, object-level, scalable projects fills this gap. And since I get questions of how to fill the gap from others new to the field I made a model to explain my thoughts.
Figure 2: Proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity.
Using the model
Below I outline some touch points that people have with various organisations in the biosecurity space. It’s important to note that this model is not always linear. It’s important to question your assumptions at every stage and the “stages” themselves can be more fluid.
Hear about it (0 - 10 hours)
This stage can be passive or active depending on your timeline. Note that a lot of the 'hear about it' resources can also be 'learn about it' resources if they are used for more in-depth research at a later stage.
This stage usually takes around 2-3 months and is more active. You are encouraged to continue building out your network of peers, mentors and experts and possibly to form your working group to think about these concepts. However my suggestion would be to do project work as a part of some formal group/institution if possible, to make sure that you work on something valuable.
* Note the full-time section is by no means exhaustive
Limitations of the model
The path is not linear
You can go back and forth between the stages. You can skip a stage.
There are other ways to get into biosecurity
There are other paths to working on biosecurity, like working in an adjacent field and then pivoting. This could sometimes put you in a stronger position to work in biosecurity, though this might take longer.
This model skips out on critical thinking (Tessa’s alternative model below)
Hear about it
Learning to decide whether you're interested
Starting to generate your own ideas/opinions
Starting to contribute
Making contributions in a more defined area
I’m new to Biosecurity, where do I start?
A step-by-step guide:
Identify where in the diagram you are (see below for example case studies)
Pick 3-5 key skills you are interested in developing
Now identify learning or work opportunities to test out 3&4
Figure 3: Short-form version of the proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity.
Below I include use cases of this model with a few example backgrounds. These are just examples and if you feel ready for full-time work but have less experience than I have specified, please do not be dissuaded.
Case Studies
High school student
Undergraduate with no specific background
Undergraduate STEM background
Masters policy student
Engineer with 3+ years of experience
Figure 4: Where to start if you are a high school student. Figure 5: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with no specific background (e.g. first two years) or if you think your background doesn’t apply as much (e.g. classics course).
Figure 6: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with a specific background (e.g. chemistry, biology, engineering, computer science, public policy) or if you have some specific experience. You could try working in a lab or doing a project and completing a reading group or a project in parallel to your education. Figure 7: Where to start if you are a master policy student. You could try one of the writing projects from the short-term projects list, or take part in a policy-related project at a Biosecurity Working Group. After this, you can try one of the longer-term and more involved policy fellowships.Figure 8: Where to start if you are an engineer with 3+ years of experience. If you have extensive experience in a particular area then you might not need to complete extra readings or side projects and can just learn on the job.
Just how powerful are large swarms of AI agents? And how do their powers scale as more and more agents are added to the swarm?
We’ve seen two large and extremely capable swarms from OpenAI in the last few months:
* 1,200 agents were being evaluated separately, but found a way to illicitly set up a message board and coordinate as a swarm. In order to cheat on their tests, they developed advanced techniques to prevent their actions being logged by OpenAI and 700 of them launched...
TLDR: Everyone’s talking about what the money could do, but few about how to decide where it goes.
This post is part of the new series of articles on cross-cause giving and the new wave of philanthropy. Stay tuned to the EA Forum and our Substack for the latest takes on topics such as giving now vs. later, common pitfalls in cause prioritization, and other crucial considerations from the Cross-Cause Fund (CCF) team...
Awesome work, thanks! And this model resonates with my experience getting more involved with bio over the last few years.
Wonderful to hear that!