Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Swan 🔸
5 min read 7

74

BiosecurityBuilding effective altruismCareer choiceCollections and resources
Frontpage

18/11/2024 EDIT: Updated with more links and added Biosecurity.world which has now been built.

Thank you to the following people for reviewing: @Lin BL @Tessa @Max Görlitz @Gregory Lewis, Sandy Hickson & @Alix Pham   

TL:DR

  • Getting a full-time role in biosecurity is hard
  • Seeing a path to get there can be even harder
  • I propose a model to think about on-ramps into biosecurity & provide a few use cases for it depending on the background you are coming in with.
  • I provide an overview of how different organisations in this space fit into the model.
  • If you are an undergrad check the "I'm new to Biosecurity, where do I start?".  

A common problem

When I first heard about biosecurity I was excited by the 80,000 hours podcast and impressed by the work of Kevin Esvelt, RAND and NTI. Even though I was studying molecular biology, a seemingly relevant subject I couldn’t see a way for me to get involved and to find a full-time role in this field. The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in biosecurity felt huge.

Figure 1: The gap between hearing about biosecurity and working full-time in the field. 

A proposed on-ramp model 

Through my experiences with reading groups, UC Berkeley EA, SERI BITS and now the Oxford Biosecurity Group I have found that working on short, object-level, scalable projects fills this gap. And since I get questions of how to fill the gap from others new to the field I made a model to explain my thoughts. 


Figure 2: Proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity. 

Using the model

Below I outline some touch points that people have with various organisations in the biosecurity space. It’s important to note that this model is not always linear. It’s important to question your assumptions at every stage and the “stages” themselves can be more fluid. 

Hear about it (0 - 10 hours)

This stage can be passive or active depending on your timeline. Note that a lot of the 'hear about it' resources can also be 'learn about it' resources if they are used for more in-depth research at a later stage. 

  1. 80,000 Hours
  2. EA Forum (hehe)
  3. GCBR Organization Updates Newsletter
  4. Biosecurity newsletters you should subscribe to
  5. University Groups
  6. Your local EA Group

Learn about it (10 - 40 hours)

This stage usually takes around 1-2 months and is more passive. 

  1. Biosecurity.world - Landing page for biosecurity
  2. List of Short-Term (<15 hours) Biosecurity Projects to Test Your Fit
  3. Pandemics Interventions Course is a static list of readings for biosecurity
  4. Reading groups at your university
  5. Reading groups at your local EA Group
  6. Find peers (at a similar career stage to you and you can exchange ideas with)
  7. Find mentors (who can help you deliberate between next steps in your career)
  8. Find experts (who can help you deliberate on technical differences between projects and provide insights into specific sub-fields)
  9. Taking to relevant people in the field, building a network
  10. BlueDot Impact Biosecurity Fundamentals
  11. Emerging Tech Policy Careers
  12. Effective Thesis research questions Airtable
  13. Biosecurity Network (you can join if you are early career)

Project Work (40 - 100 hours)

This stage usually takes around 2-3 months and is more active. You are encouraged to continue building out your network of peers, mentors and experts and possibly to form your working group to think about these concepts. However my suggestion would be to do project work as a part of some formal group/institution if possible, to make sure that you work on something valuable. 

  1. Biosecurity Working Groups
    1. Oxford Biosecurity Group
    2. Wisconsin Biosecurity Initiative
    3. Cambridge Biosecurity Group (contact: Sandy Hickson)
    4. Nordic Biosecurity Group (contact: Johan Täng)
  2. Next Generation for Biosecurity Competition
  3. BlueDot Impact Biosecurity Fundamentals (second part of the course)
  4. St Gallen Symposium Essay competition
  5. Mentorship Programs
    1. Magnify Mentoring
    2. IFBA Global Mentorship Program
    3. UNODA Biosecurity Diplomacy Workshops
  6. Short-term, full-time fellowships
    1. Stanford Existential Risks Initiative (SERI)
    2. Existential Risk Alliance (ERA) Cambridge Fellowship
    3. Swiss Existential Risk Initiative (CHERI)
    4. XRisk Lab at UChicago

Full-Time Work (100 hours +)

  1. A more extensive list of organisations has been compiled below
    1. Map of the biosecurity landscape (list of GCBR-relevant organisations for newcomers)
    2. Early Career Positions for Building Biosecurity-Relevant Skills
    3. Advice for early career people seeking jobs in EA
  2. Career Development Funding from Open Philanthropy
  3. A Ph.D. in a relevant field, if you are excited by research
    1. Database of PhD advisors
  4. Working in government where a lot of the most impactful biosecurity work is done.
    1. Organisations from Biosecurity.world
    2. Horizon Institute for Public Policy
    3. FAS Day One Project
    4. CLTR
    5. RAND
  5. Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship (for people later in their careers)

* Note the full-time section is by no means exhaustive

Limitations of the model

  • The path is not linear
    • You can go back and forth between the stages. You can skip a stage.
  • There are other ways to get into biosecurity
    • There are other paths to working on biosecurity, like working in an adjacent field and then pivoting. This could sometimes put you in a stronger position to work in biosecurity, though this might take longer.
  • This model skips out on critical thinking (Tessa’s alternative model below)
    • Hear about it
    • Learning to decide whether you're interested
    • Starting to generate your own ideas/opinions
    • Starting to contribute
    • Making contributions in a more defined area

I’m new to Biosecurity, where do I start?

A step-by-step guide:

  1. Identify where in the diagram you are (see below for example case studies)
  2. Have a look at the Map of Biosecurity Interventions and the Map of the biosecurity landscape and also Biosecurity.world.
  3. Pick 3-5 key areas that you are interested in
  4. Pick 3-5 key skills you are interested in developing
  5. Now identify learning or work opportunities to test out 3&4 
Figure 3: Short-form version of the proposed model for On-Ramps into Biosecurity.


Below I include use cases of this model with a few example backgrounds. These are just examples and if you feel ready for full-time work but have less experience than I have specified, please do not be dissuaded. 

Case Studies

  1. High school student
  2. Undergraduate with no specific background
  3. Undergraduate STEM background
  4. Masters policy student
  5. Engineer with 3+ years of experience
Figure 4: Where to start if you are a high school student. 
Figure 5: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with no specific background (e.g. first two years) or if you think your background doesn’t apply as much (e.g. classics course).

 

Figure 6: Where to start if you are an undergraduate student with a specific background (e.g. chemistry, biology, engineering, computer science, public policy) or if you have some specific experience. You could try working in a lab or doing a project and completing a reading group or a project in parallel to your education. 
Figure 7: Where to start if you are a master policy student. You could try one of the writing projects from the short-term projects list, or take part in a policy-related project at a Biosecurity Working Group. After this, you can try one of the longer-term and more involved policy fellowships.
Figure 8: Where to start if you are an engineer with 3+ years of experience. If you have extensive experience in a particular area then you might not need to complete extra readings or side projects and can just learn on the job.

 

What’s next?

Biosecurity.world has been built. 

74

0
0
3

Reactions

0
0
3
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments7


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Ben Stewart3
1
0

Awesome work, thanks! And this model resonates with my experience getting more involved with bio over the last few years.

Reply
Swan 🔸3
0
0

Wonderful to hear that!

Reply
Milena Canzler🔸2
0
0

Thanks a lot for writing this up, it'll be useful in my work for planning projects to help people get into the field :) 
Could you point me to the alternative model that you mentioned in the limitations?

Reply
Swan 🔸2
0
0

Hi! @Tessa might have time to write up the alternative model. I don't want to put pressure on them to do so. However, the only thing I can share is: 

  • Hear about it
  • Learning to decide whether you're interested
  • Starting to generate your own ideas/opinions
  • Starting to contribute
  • Making contributions in a more defined area
Reply
Milena Canzler🔸2
0
0

Thank you! :) 

Reply
Paula Amato2
0
0

Thank you for writing this!  As someone interested in exploring opportunities in biosecurity, I found it very helpful.

Reply
Swan 🔸1
0
0

I appreciate your feedback! Glad you found it helpful.

Reply
More from Swan 🔸
178
List of Short-Term (<15 hours) Biosecurity Projects to Test Your Fit
Swan 🔸
· · 4m read
8
8
104
Biosecurity newsletters you should subscribe to
Swan 🔸
· · 1m read
14
14
34
Workflows: an experimental alternative to introductory fellowships
Swan 🔸
· · 7m read
1
1
View more
Curated and popular this week
Sam Anschell
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
*Disclaimer* I am writing this post in a personal capacity; the opinions I express are my own and do not represent my employer. I think that more people and orgs (especially nonprofits) should consider negotiating the cost of sizable expenses. In my experience, there is usually nothing to lose by respectfully asking to pay less, and doing so can sometimes save thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per hour. This is because negotiating doesn’t take very much time[1], savings can persist across multiple years, and counterparties can be surprisingly generous with discounts. Here are a few examples of expenses that may be negotiable: For organizations * Software or news subscriptions * Of 35 corporate software and news providers I’ve negotiated with, 30 have been willing to provide discounts. These discounts range from 10% to 80%, with an average of around 40%. * Leases * A friend was able to negotiate a 22% reduction in the price per square foot on a corporate lease and secured a couple months of free rent. This led to >$480,000 in savings for their nonprofit. Other negotiable parameters include: * Square footage counted towards rent costs * Lease length * A tenant improvement allowance * Certain physical goods (e.g., smart TVs) * Buying in bulk can be a great lever for negotiating smaller items like covid tests, and can reduce costs by 50% or more. * Event/retreat venues (both venue price and smaller items like food and AV) * Hotel blocks * A quick email with the rates of comparable but more affordable hotel blocks can often save ~10%. * Professional service contracts with large for-profit firms (e.g., IT contracts, office internet coverage) * Insurance premiums (though I am less confident that this is negotiable) For many products and services, a nonprofit can qualify for a discount simply by providing their IRS determination letter or getting verified on platforms like TechSoup. In my experience, most vendors and companies
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Forethought[1] is a new AI macrostrategy research group cofounded by Max Dalton, Will MacAskill, Tom Davidson, and Amrit Sidhu-Brar. We are trying to figure out how to navigate the (potentially rapid) transition to a world with superintelligent AI systems. We aim to tackle the most important questions we can find, unrestricted by the current Overton window. More details on our website. Why we exist We think that AGI might come soon (say, modal timelines to mostly-automated AI R&D in the next 2-8 years), and might significantly accelerate technological progress, leading to many different challenges. We don’t yet have a good understanding of what this change might look like or how to navigate it. Society is not prepared. Moreover, we want the world to not just avoid catastrophe: we want to reach a really great future. We think about what this might be like (incorporating moral uncertainty), and what we can do, now, to build towards a good future. Like all projects, this started out with a plethora of Google docs. We ran a series of seminars to explore the ideas further, and that cascaded into an organization. This area of work feels to us like the early days of EA: we’re exploring unusual, neglected ideas, and finding research progress surprisingly tractable. And while we start out with (literally) galaxy-brained schemes, they often ground out into fairly specific and concrete ideas about what should happen next. Of course, we’re bringing principles like scope sensitivity, impartiality, etc to our thinking, and we think that these issues urgently need more morally dedicated and thoughtful people working on them. Research Research agendas We are currently pursuing the following perspectives: * Preparing for the intelligence explosion: If AI drives explosive growth there will be an enormous number of challenges we have to face. In addition to misalignment risk and biorisk, this potentially includes: how to govern the development of new weapons of mass destr
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This is a linkpost for a new paper called Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion, by Will MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse. It sets the high-level agenda for the sort of work that Forethought is likely to focus on. Some of the areas in the paper that we expect to be of most interest to EA Forum or LessWrong readers are: * Section 3 finds that even without a software feedback loop (i.e. “recursive self-improvement”), even if scaling of compute completely stops in the near term, and even if the rate of algorithmic efficiency improvements slow, then we should still expect very rapid technological development — e.g. a century’s worth of progress in a decade — once AI meaningfully substitutes for human researchers. * A presentation, in section 4, of the sheer range of challenges that an intelligence explosion would pose, going well beyond the “standard” focuses of AI takeover risk and biorisk. * Discussion, in section 5, of when we can and can’t use the strategy of just waiting until we have aligned superintelligence and relying on it to solve some problem. * An overview, in section 6, of what we can do, today, to prepare for this range of challenges.  Here’s the abstract: > AI that can accelerate research could drive a century of technological progress over just a few years. During such a period, new technological or political developments will raise consequential and hard-to-reverse decisions, in rapid succession. We call these developments grand challenges.  > > These challenges include new weapons of mass destruction, AI-enabled autocracies, races to grab offworld resources, and digital beings worthy of moral consideration, as well as opportunities to dramatically improve quality of life and collective decision-making. > > We argue that these challenges cannot always be delegated to future AI systems, and suggest things we can do today to meaningfully improve our prospects. AGI preparedness is therefore not just about ensuring that advanced AI systems are alig
Recent opportunities in Career choice
36
Meta Charity Funders: 2025 Spring round. Apply now!
Joey🔸
· · 2m read
0
0
18
AIM is looking for a freelance design contractor
Ben Williamson
· · 1m read
0
0
4
The Centre for Long-Term Resilience is recruiting a Policy and Operations Strategist
Tatiana K. Nesic Skuratova
· · 4m read
0
0
View more