Hide table of contents

Summary

In this article, I'll share my journey of joining an effective altruism (EA) organisation in the middle of my career. I'll talk about the misconceptions I initially held, how I came to understand the fundamental ideas of EA, increased my involvement in the community, and started connecting with more experienced members. I will also share how I became more active through volunteer work and then intentionally worked towards transitioning my career to have more impact.

Introduction

Within the EA community, you will find many young individuals who started engaging with EA ideas during their university years, devoting significant time to podcasts and articles. While the movement has a large youth presence, seasoned professionals are less common. EA-aligned organisations are eager for professionals who embody their core values. However, immersing oneself in these values can be a challenge if you're already occupied with a full-time job and commitments to family and friends.

I was introduced to EA at the age of 40 and without a university degree. At that point, I couldn't see a clear path to working directly in a high-impact area. Yet, eight years later, I became the Co-Director at EA Germany, guiding individuals on their quest for more impactful career paths. Looking back, I believe I could have made the career transition sooner had I had fewer misunderstandings and focused more on specific areas.

My Misconceptions about EA

When I initially began attending my local EA group meetings, I had misconceptions about the requisites for deeper engagement with the EA community. I erroneously believed that it required a complete dedication to veganism, a commitment to donating at least 10% of income, and a lifestyle wholly centred around maximising impact.

One of my first experiences with the group involved a discussion on animal welfare. As the co-founder of a company that promotes higher animal-welfare yarn from sheep's wool, I felt aligned with their mission. Yet, I noticed that many participants advocated for an entirely vegan lifestyle, excluding all animal products. Their backgrounds, largely consisting of younger students, also seemed to widen the gap of understanding between us.

Later, I met individuals who committed to donating 10% of their income to impactful charities. I admired their dedication but was uncertain if I could match that contribution level. I also came across people who believed that EA demanded a life entirely devoted to maximising the overall good.

However, as time passed, I understood these were individual choices rather than a standard or norm within the EA community. I met actively involved EA members who were not vegans, concentrated more on their careers than on donations, and enjoyed leisure activities unrelated to their impact work. I eventually concluded that, for me, prioritising a career change held more significance than modifying my lifestyle.

Core Values of EA

While it is true that choices are individual, and people have different values and priorities in their private lives, EA has principles that most people follow. These include prioritisation, impartial altruism, open truth-seeking, and a collaborative spirit. Having individuals who adhere to these values in the community and organisations fosters easier collaboration, as there is a higher level of trust and underlying agreement compared to society at large.

My previous experiences in business and political activism taught me to present myself in the best light, select beliefs that supported my purpose, and prioritise self-advocacy over collaboration. Engaging more with the EA community required being open to changing my beliefs, practising epistemic humility, and focusing on how I could help others. I learned this by reading, listening to podcasts, and observing people’s behaviour within the community. "The Scout Mindset" by Julia Galef is an excellent book that introduces the truth-seeking mindset.

Getting more involved

My journey with Effective Altruism (EA) began with a newspaper article, which led me to explore various EA websites. If the introductory article that's currently available had been accessible back then, I would have eagerly read it.

In the following years, I attended talks at my local EA group and utilised EA resources to alter my approach to donations. Only when the Covid-19 pandemic struck did I find the time to join an online reading group. We delved into some of the essential articles about EA compiled in the EA handbook, fostering enlightening discussions.

This deeper exploration of the philosophical ideas and research supporting cause prioritisation and impactful actions enhanced my understanding of EA. It even changed my perspective on global catastrophic risks, elevating it as a higher priority in my mind.

To emulate my experience, consider enrolling in an 8-week introductory program. Be aware, though, that it demands around 3 hours per week, which could be challenging to manage if you're swamped. While not obligatory, this program helped me grasp the foundational concepts that underpin the reasoning in EA. If you prefer, you can also study the EA handbook independently.

Reaching Out

As I delved deeper into EA, thinking through podcasts and posts, I discovered that the movement is full of intelligent individuals who had figured things out. Initially, I questioned what value I could contribute and hesitated to contact them. I didn’t want to take the time of busy people working on important things, and I thought I would seem stupid in our interactions.

Once I overcame my reluctance, I found the people very open and encouraging. They shared their challenges, reminding me of the typical struggles in startups and small businesses, such as management gaps, operational issues, and a need for more senior professionals. I realised that my knowledge could be valuable, and it was essential to communicate with others and build networks to understand these organisations' needs better.

Attending EAG and EAGx conferences allowed me to set up one-on-one meetings with participants who could answer my questions. For example, with my background in running a software development organisation, I thought providing similar services in EA might be the best thing I could do. In talks with different people, I learned that gaps in experience around the building and leading of EA-aligned organisations were more pressing and that I could help there.

These meetings became a valuable source of knowledge, and through introductions, I gradually built my network. In addition to the conferences, connections through my local and national EA groups helped. If professional-focussed EA organisations had been more active around that time, I could have also profited by engaging with them.

Active Participation

At an Effective Altruism Global (EAG) conference, I discovered an opportunity to volunteer in a domain closely aligned with my professional experience.

I connected with Devon Fritz, now the co-founder of High Impact Professionals, who was among a handful of mid-career German professionals in attendance. He shared an idea he had been contemplating – to develop a donation management system for Effektiv Spenden. This German organisation facilitates tax-deductible donations to charities that have a significant impact. However, Devon was unable to pursue this idea due to other commitments.

Seeing a perfect opportunity to leverage my software development skills honed in FinTech startups, I contacted Effektiv Spenden and offered to take on this project. They agreed, and I dedicated several hours weekly over the ensuing months to build the system.

The project had an immediate impact by reducing operational costs for the organisation. Furthermore, it provided an invaluable opportunity to familiarise myself with the team, connect with other organisations focused on effective giving, and deepen my understanding of the sector.

On top of this, I began hosting meetings within my local community. These gatherings facilitated deeper connections and fostered comprehensive discussions with a broader range of individuals.

Additionally, I started organising meetings within my local community, which allowed me to connect with more people and engage in in-depth discussions.

Career Change

Having a network of people in EA who I could discuss ideas with and who could point me to contacts and opportunities was crucial for me to realise that I might be able to contribute and to see where I might have the best fit.

The 80,000 Hours career guide became crucial for me to structure my career planning process systematically. Identifying the most pressing problems required effort, but it helped sharpen my focus and intentions. I also joined a career group, where we collaboratively navigated the guide's steps and engaged in insightful discussions.

I applied for a one-on-one consultation where I expressed my uncertainty about working in the top priority area I had identified: AI safety technical research. To my surprise, my advisor introduced me to professionals already working in that field, leading operations teams – a role I could envision for myself. These connections, both online and at conferences, led to serious discussions regarding potential employment opportunities.

Parallel to this, I gained the confidence to decline job offers from EA-aligned organisations that I perceived as having less impact, despite their appeal. Some opportunities involved leading teams at EA-aligned startups. However, accepting them would have meant deviating from the top causes on my list. Instead of settling for the next available option, I aimed high, seeking roles that matched exceptionally well with my skills and the cause areas I had on the top of my list.

Impact and Community

Being part of the EA community has provided me with crucial support, knowledge, and motivation. However, engaging with the community can be daunting, especially if you are noticeably older than most members. It's vital to remember that deep integration with the broader EA community isn't necessary for making a meaningful impact through your career.

You can use EA resources to gain the necessary knowledge and apply to relevant job positions, even without actively participating in group meetings or retreats. Many working in EA-aligned organisations maintain a fulfilling professional life without having close personal ties within the movement, thus keeping their professional and personal lives distinct.

However, if you're in a situation where you're the only one holding EA values within an organisation, it can be beneficial to reach out to others in the EA community who are in similar situations. By doing this, you can build a network of individuals with shared values and goals, forming a supportive community that understands and can help you navigate the unique challenges you may face.

Persistence

Navigating a career path for higher impact can be a gradual process. It can be disheartening to face job rejections and the challenge of continuous attempts, and certain roles may be difficult to get into. It's unfortunate when driven individuals keen on shifting careers to make a more significant impact, acquire new knowledge, and establish networks, end up bowing out too early.

However, even if you continue in a different job, you can still maintain your connection with the community. There are various ways to contribute, such as donating within your means, initiating workplace programs at your organisation, volunteering at impactful organisations or mentoring individuals in your free time.

In time, a job opportunity that matches your skills might present itself, enabling you to contribute directly. So, it's important to keep going, or you might miss out on substantial opportunities.

Resources

Acknowledgements

I thank Devon Fritz, Jacob Schaal and Sarah Tegeler for comments on a draft of this post. For my career transition, I would like to thank the many people who provided crucial input, deep discussions, contacts and encouragement, including Ben Clifford, Beth Barnes, Bill Zito, Devon Fritz, Ethan Alley, Habiba Banu, Jeffrey Poche, Joey Savoie, Jonathan Harris, Lennart Heim, Nick Fitz, Sara Elsholz, Sebastian Schwiecker and Steve Thompson as well as Charlie, Mart, Jan and Isidor from my local EA discussion group and Vanessa for organising a career program.

Comments5


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Patrick, thanks for sharing your story! Seeing all these high school students get involved in EA and starting high impact research projects before they even go to university can feel overwhelming; how could a mid-career professional compete with that???

Actually, mid-career professionals are awesome. They know how the real world works, and they know how to get stuff done. People who have only been students don't know how to navigate government bureaucracies, bring a product from conception to market, or manage large teams. Indeed, many of our most impressive community members spent their first 10+ years doing non-EA work in the "real world". Of course whiz kids are also fantastic! But they need mentorship! 

So I'm really happy to see you found a place in the EA community, and I hope many more follow your path <3  

Thank you very much for sharing your insightful and motivating story.

But I'd like to advise to always be wary of survivorship bias. People who burned out are much less likely to write about it than someone who made it.

Parallel to this, I gained the confidence to decline job offers from EA-aligned organisations that I perceived as having less impact, despite their appeal. Some opportunities involved leading teams at EA-aligned startups. However, accepting them would have meant deviating from the top causes on my list. Instead of settling for the next available option, I aimed high, seeking roles that matched exceptionally well with my skills and the cause areas I had on the top of my list.

Thank you Patrick for sharing your story. I am going through a similar journey myself as a mid-career professional. Such stories keep me motivated when it is unclear what the next steps are.

I am in a good position because I am not under the short term time pressure to figure this out. As Milli | Martin wrote I wonder how many people are burnt out in the process.

I think there would be merits to understanding how long does it take for mid-career people to find a good placement, what are the dropout rates and what could be done to shorten this timeframe possibly.

Typically at this point in life, there is more pressure both from the financial and family side to figure this out if the person is the primary earner in the given family.

Thank you for writing this article Patrick.

As someone with a similar-ish background of discovering EA in mid-career, many of the things you mentioned resonate with my experience. I might write a post about my own experience.

This in many ways, is really affirming. Thanks for writing!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 20m read
 · 
Advanced AI could unlock an era of enlightened and competent government action. But without smart, active investment, we’ll squander that opportunity and barrel blindly into danger. Executive summary See also a summary on Twitter / X. The US federal government is falling behind the private sector on AI adoption. As AI improves, a growing gap would leave the government unable to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges and threaten the legitimacy of its democratic institutions. A dual imperative → Government adoption of AI can’t wait. Making steady progress is critical to: * Boost the government’s capacity to effectively respond to AI-driven existential challenges * Help democratic oversight keep up with the technological power of other groups * Defuse the risk of rushed AI adoption in a crisis → But hasty AI adoption could backfire. Without care, integration of AI could: * Be exploited, subverting independent government action * Lead to unsafe deployment of AI systems * Accelerate arms races or compress safety research timelines Summary of the recommendations 1. Work with the US federal government to help it effectively adopt AI Simplistic “pro-security” or “pro-speed” attitudes miss the point. Both are important — and many interventions would help with both. We should: * Invest in win-win measures that both facilitate adoption and reduce the risks involved, e.g.: * Build technical expertise within government (invest in AI and technical talent, ensure NIST is well resourced) * Streamline procurement processes for AI products and related tech (like cloud services) * Modernize the government’s digital infrastructure and data management practices * Prioritize high-leverage interventions that have strong adoption-boosting benefits with minor security costs or vice versa, e.g.: * On the security side: investing in cyber security, pre-deployment testing of AI in high-stakes areas, and advancing research on mitigating the ris
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
In our recent strategy retreat, the GWWC Leadership Team recognised that by spreading our limited resources across too many projects, we are unable to deliver the level of excellence and impact that our mission demands. True to our value of being mission accountable, we've therefore made the difficult but necessary decision to discontinue a total of 10 initiatives. By focusing our energy on fewer, more strategically aligned initiatives, we think we’ll be more likely to ultimately achieve our Big Hairy Audacious Goal of 1 million pledgers donating $3B USD to high-impact charities annually. (See our 2025 strategy.) We’d like to be transparent about the choices we made, both to hold ourselves accountable and so other organisations can take the gaps we leave into account when planning their work. As such, this post aims to: * Inform the broader EA community about changes to projects & highlight opportunities to carry these projects forward * Provide timelines for project transitions * Explain our rationale for discontinuing certain initiatives What’s changing  We've identified 10 initiatives[1] to wind down or transition. These are: * GWWC Canada * Effective Altruism Australia funding partnership * GWWC Groups * Giving Games * Charity Elections * Effective Giving Meta evaluation and grantmaking * The Donor Lottery * Translations * Hosted Funds * New licensing of the GWWC brand  Each of these is detailed in the sections below, with timelines and transition plans where applicable. How this is relevant to you  We still believe in the impact potential of many of these projects. Our decision doesn’t necessarily reflect their lack of value, but rather our need to focus at this juncture of GWWC's development.  Thus, we are actively looking for organisations and individuals interested in taking on some of these projects. If that’s you, please do reach out: see each project's section for specific contact details. Thank you for your continued support as we
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
We are excited to share a summary of our 2025 strategy, which builds on our work in 2024 and provides a vision through 2027 and beyond! Background Giving What We Can (GWWC) is working towards a world without preventable suffering or existential risk, where everyone is able to flourish. We do this by making giving effectively and significantly a cultural norm. Focus on pledges Based on our last impact evaluation[1], we have made our pledges –  and in particular the 🔸10% Pledge – the core focus of GWWC’s work.[2] We know the 🔸10% Pledge is a powerful institution, as we’ve seen almost 10,000 people take it and give nearly $50M USD to high-impact charities annually. We believe it could become a norm among at least the richest 1% — and likely a much wider segment of the population — which would cumulatively direct an enormous quantity of financial resources towards tackling the world’s most pressing problems.  We initiated this focus on pledges in early 2024, and are doubling down on it in 2025. In line with this, we are retiring various other initiatives we were previously running and which are not consistent with our new strategy. Introducing our BHAG We are setting ourselves a long-term Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG) of 1 million pledgers donating $3B USD to high-impact charities annually, which we will start working towards in 2025. 1 million pledgers donating $3B USD to high-impact charities annually would be roughly equivalent to ~100x GWWC’s current scale, and could be achieved by 1% of the world’s richest 1% pledging and giving effectively. Achieving this would imply the equivalent of nearly 1 million lives being saved[3] every year. See the BHAG FAQ for more info. Working towards our BHAG Over the coming years, we expect to test various growth pathways and interventions that could get us to our BHAG, including digital marketing, partnerships with aligned organisations, community advocacy, media/PR, and direct outreach to potential pledgers. We thin