Comment Permalink

I downvoted this because I think this isn't independently valuable / separate enough from your existing posts to merit a new, separate post. I think it would have been better as a comment on your existing posts (and as I've said on a post by someone else about your reviews, I think we're better off consolidating the discussion in one place).

That said, I think the sentiments expressed here are pretty reasonable, and I would have upvoted this in comment form I think.

VettedCauses

Feb 22

Thanks for the feedback, Ben. This was the topic that most people were reaching out to us about, and we felt that many others likely had the same question. We would have done a comment, but we didn't think it would have the same reach. That said, we've now added a comment to our original post as you suggested. Do you have any advice on how to handle similar situations in the future?

RebeccaFeb 267

It seems appropriate for a quick take imo

See in context

Clarifying Our Intentions

by VettedCauses

Feb 221 min read 4

-12

Animal welfareCommunityPolicyCharity evaluationTransparency

Frontpage

Several people have contacted us asking about our intentions regarding the charity review we posted earlier this week.

To be clear, we release negative reviews not because we enjoy calling people out, but because we want problems to be fixed. Everyone makes mistakes, and most mistakes can be recovered from. If every charity shut down after they made a major mistake, there would be very few charities left.

We hope the charities we’ve reviewed address the problems we’ve detailed. In the future, we may review them again, and hope that we are able to recommend them for doing great work.

We acknowledge that we may have not gone about this in the best manner. Still, we hope all of the concerns we have raised are properly addressed.

-12

Reactions

Comments4

Sorted by

New & upvoted

Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 3:46 AM

Ben Millwood🔸Feb 2210

That said, I think the sentiments expressed here are pretty reasonable, and I would have upvoted this in comment form I think.

VettedCausesFeb 220

That said, we've now added a comment to our original post as you suggested. Do you have any advice on how to handle similar situations in the future?

RebeccaFeb 267

It seems appropriate for a quick take imo

Carolina Galvani - Sinergia AnimalFeb 266

Hi everyone,

I’m Carolina, International Executive Director of Sinergia Animal.

I want to acknowledge that members of this community have shared this post with us, and we truly appreciate your engagement and interest in our work. A deep commitment to create real change, transparency and honesty have always been central to our approach, and we will address all concerns accordingly.

To clarify in advance, we have never taken credit for pre-existing or non-existent policies, and we will explain this in our response. We always strive to estimate our impact in good faith and will carefully review our methodology based on this feedback to address any concerns, if valid.

This discussion comes at a particularly busy time for us, as we have been attending EA Global while continuing our critical work across eight countries. We appreciate your patience as we prepare a thorough response.

As a best practice, we believe organizations mentioned by others in posts should have the chance to respond before content is published. We take the principle of the right to reply so seriously that we even extend it to companies targeted in our campaigns or enforcement programs. In that spirit, we will share our response with Vetted Causes via the email provided on their website 24 hours (or as much time as Vetted Causes prefers) before publishing it on the Forum.

The EA community has been a vital supporter of our work, and we hope this serves as an constructive opportunity to provide further insight into our efforts and approach.

Best,
Carolina