Hey everyone,
I’d love to get your thoughts on an idea I’m working on: a mobile app that gamifies charitable giving, encouraging users to donate $5 a day (perhaps a bit less depending on the target group) to high-impact charities. The goal is to create a daily habit of generosity, leveraging the psychological benefits of prosocial spending (as shown in Dunn’s Happy Money research) while driving significant funding to effective causes.
The Concept
Each day, users receive a push notification prompting them to donate. They can:
- Pick from three featured charities, rotating based on urgency/impact.
- Select any charity of their choice.
To reinforce the joy of giving, the app includes:
- Streak tracking & rewards (e.g., badges, milestone unlocks).
- Social proof nudges (e.g., "50 people in your city gave to this today").
- Monthly & annual impact reports (showing the collective impact of all users).
- Community discussions on generosity & effective giving.
Why Daily Giving?
Many in the EA community optimize for lump-sum giving, which makes sense for maximizing impact. But this app isn’t meant to replace that—it’s about:
- Building a stronger giving identity: Reinforcing generosity as part of our daily lives.
- Leveraging psychology: Studies show frequent giving increases happiness and generosity over time.
- Expanding the donor pool: Many people struggle to commit large sums but can easily justify $5/day.
- Providing an alternative to trivial spending: Instead of a daily coffee, you fund malaria nets, cash transfers, or climate solutions.
EA Alignment
While users could support any charity, the recommended options would prioritize high-impact, evidence-based causes, such as GiveWell recommendations, effective climate interventions, and global health initiatives.
Your Thoughts?
- Would this app be valuable to the EA movement?
- How can we optimize for real impact while keeping the habit-building benefits?
- Are there risks or unintended consequences?
I’d really appreciate your feedback—both from a behavioral economics perspective and an EA effectiveness lens. Thanks in advance!
Looking forward to your thoughts,
Joe
Thank you very much for the super helpful feedback. I love the idea of giving donation credit as a gift. I've felt the same conundrum when donating on behalf of others where you're ultimately choosing for them where the money goes. Giving them the money then letting them choose the destination is a great fix.
Matching funds is also something I'd love to incorporate though the way I thought of it could be a corporate or larger donor could sponsor a challenge like when you hit 30 days of consistent giving your next five donations could be matched. Or to drive donations to a specific place: if 100 individuals give to this specific charity today then the sponsor will match the amount.
There's loads of potential to find ways to motivate others through 'bonus' donations. I would want to target people to support this program at a larger level who might be able to back the 30 days of consistent giving unlocks $20 of extra money to be directed by the user.
Would be great to continue brainstorming.
I also feel that the app would benefit from being able to educate the users about the three prompted causes each day. That way the giving is less robotic and more investigative. People who perhaps had not been exposed to FGM or the impact of malaria or climate change adaptation have a resource to expand their connection to philanthropy