Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Ramiro
Jun 11 20201 min read1 answer 5

11

Frontpage

https://futureoflife.org/future-of-life-award-unsung-hero-search/

Every year, the Future of Life Institute (FLI) awards U$50,000 to an unsung hero - an "individual who, without receiving much recognition at the time, has helped make today dramatically better than it may otherwise have been". Previously, the prize went to Vasili Arkhipov, S. Petrov and Matthew Meselson.

I think it might be interesting to discuss the subject in this Forum.

On the other hand... well, there's money to be made. Maybe that's why people don't debate it openly?

11

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment

1 Answers sorted by
Top

Peter Wildeford

Jun 12, 2020

24
0
0

I don't know who would win, but if people are taking nominations I'd like to nominate Maurice Hilleman:

Maurice Ralph Hilleman (August 30, 1919 – April 11, 2005) was an American microbiologist who specialized in vaccinology and developed over 40 vaccines, an unparalleled record of productivity. Of the 14 vaccines routinely recommended in current vaccine schedules, he developed eight: those for measles, mumps, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, chickenpox, meningitis, pneumonia and Haemophilus influenzae bacteria. He also played a role in the discovery of the cold-producing adenoviruses, the hepatitis viruses, and the potentially cancer-causing virus SV40.
Julia_Wise4y6
0
0

Wow, that's astonishing. I imagine it's more complex than a single person single-handedly developing each vaccine, but still.

Reply
2
Ramiro
4y
A very strong candidate, indeed. But my nomination goes to a classical: Viktor Zhdanov, the soviet bioweapons expert who convinced WHO to eradicate smallpox. (I just realized that it would be the third soviet citizen winning the award)
7
Ramiro
3y
Allow me to brag a little bit: I got this one half-right - Willaim Foege and Viktor Zhdanov will both win this year's prize.
Comments5
Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 8:26 AM
MichaelStJules4y2
0
0

I wonder what the point of giving them $50K is. Are the kind of people who would do these kinds of things motivated by this kind of money? What's the extra benefit of the money over just cashless recognition? Extra publicity? Are there cheaper ways to get that extra publicity? What about naming things after them?

Or do we need to give them cash to get them to accept the reward or for the public to not look down on the award?

Reply
Ramiro4y7
0
0

Good point. I do think it has to be an expensive signal, but why not U$25k instead of 50?

Reply
ESRogs4y3
0
0

The Nobel Prize comes with a million dollars (9,000,000 SEK). 50k doesn't seem like that much, in comparison.

Reply
Aaron Gertler4y3
0
0

In the case of Petrov, I'm under the impression (based on a documentary about him) that he probably didn't have much money, and that the prize had an element of "help a hero live in comfort." This isn't an impact-focused reason to give money, but does play into the "unsung hero" element (by creating the impression of the hero finally being "sung"/rewarded).

It's also plausible to me that the prize could have been funded by a donor who really wanted to give out cash rewards, and just worked with FLI to implement their idea (but I have no idea whether this is true and I don't think it's likely).

Reply
MichaelStJules4y2
0
0

Petrov's family received the award a bit over a year after he passed away, though, in this case. Of course, I'd imagine he would have wanted his family to live in comfort, too, or maybe the decision was made before his passing.

Reply
More from Ramiro
View more
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities
View more