Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Lotte_de_Lint2
0
0

I like the idea. However I think a limitation to think through, that I do not see described here, is how you will get people to visit and use your tool. Have you thought this out? What is your target audience? How do you reach them? And, why might they be motivated to use your tool? 

Reply
See in context
by Luke Eure
2 min read 5

21

Animal welfareOpportunities to take actionAnnouncements and updatesRequests (open)
Frontpage

I am prototyping a web app - called Let's Eat in Harmony - to encourage people to donate more to animal welfare charities. I'd love your feedback!

  • Primary goal: Get more people donating to effective animal charities
  • Secondary goal: Get people making more impactful dietary decisions with regards to animal welfare by understanding tradeoffs between different kinds of animal products they eat (i.e., eat beef rather than shrimp)

The target audience includes EA people, but I am positioning it to have wider appeal.

Here is the tool prototype.  (A google sheet for now. Will build it into a web app if promising)

 

My requests from you:

  • Give the tool a try
  • Any feedback you have on the potential impact of such a tool, the marketing copy, the name, the calculation methodology, etc. please leave a comment here
  • If you used the Let's Eat in Haromony tool and are willing to give user feedback, please do so here!
  • I would greatly appreciate if you used the tool and are willing to do a 15-30min user feedback interview with me. If you're willing, please book some time here

 

What is Let's Eat in Harmony? (marketing copy)

Animal suffering is a systemic problem. Individual dietary choices can help save a few animals, but massive change will come from efforts - including those by animal welfare charities - to improve animal welfare through policy and technology.

By donating surprisingly little to animal welfare charities, you can have just as much positive impact on animal welfare as if you totally gave up eating animal products. And you would be supporting the systemic fight to make life better for animals.

Let's Eat in Harmony shows you how much you should donate in order to balance the impact of your diet on the welfare of animals.

To put it another way, Let's Eat in Harmony shows you how much you need to donate to have just as much positive impact on animals as if you totally gave up eating animal products.

Of course it's even better if you are able to reduce or eliminate animal products from your diet and still donate.

 

Caveats on current version of the tool:

  • It is quite simple and assumes you consume an average amount of animal products - but allows you to say "yes" or "no" to various foods that you may or may not consume. I don't plan to make it much more complicated for the user - I think simplicity and usability is better than a super personalized recommendation
  • This version is based on average US consumption data. Future improvement would be to allow you to select country and to use average consumption from your country
  • This doesn't include anything about environmental impact. In a future version I could allow trading off animal welfare vs environmental impact (the way Food Impacts does)

21

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments6


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Bella6
2
0

Hey! A little feedback on your feedback form (hehe):

I think it should include a space for open-ended comment (Anything else you want to mention?) and/or qualitative comments, as well as just ratings, for the things you're asking about.

Putting my qualitative comments here instead:

  • I think the name is not very good — it sounds to me like a translation from another language, e.g. Japanese, and not like a phrase I would say as a native English speaker (I almost never say 'harmony'). It's also kind of long, and doesn't relate to what the product does.
  • The current Google sheet has a few typos in it
  • I think your current copy is too long and complex. It sounds technical and dry rather than clear and inviting. e.g. 'Individual dietary choices' - just say 'The way people eat' or e.g. 'but massive change will come from efforts - including those by animal welfare charities - to improve animal welfare through policy and technology.' this sounds like I expect it to come from a white paper by an animal charity rather than a web app for consumers/aimed at people who might donate to that charity. Of course that does depend on who your target audience is here :)
  • It looks like your sheet makes the assumption that eggs and milk use no animals for production, which (even if the underlying calculations work out ok - I didn't check) could be confusing
Reply
Luke Eure1
0
0

Hi Bella,

Thanks a lot for the feedback. Updated the form so people can give qualitative feedback there. Will make the google sheet clearer, and see if I can make the title and copy more compelling. Appreciate it!

Reply
Aidan Alexander3
0
0

Hey Luke, are you still moving ahead with this? I just stumbled across this post, and next month I'm launching a donation platform for animals (called Farmkind -- https://farmkind.giving) that has this sort of "offset calculator" as one of it's features, so we should coordinate!

Reply
Luke Eure1
0
0

Hey! I've paused my work on this project - still think it's very important just had to prioritize other things in my life. Very happy to talk though. I'll DM you

Reply
Lotte_de_Lint2
0
0

I like the idea. However I think a limitation to think through, that I do not see described here, is how you will get people to visit and use your tool. Have you thought this out? What is your target audience? How do you reach them? And, why might they be motivated to use your tool? 

Reply
[comment deleted]0
0
0
Deleted by Vgvt,
More from Luke Eure
273
On EA messaging - being a doctor in a poorer country
Luke Eure
· · 1m read
14
14
163
Announcing the African EA Forum Competition - $4500 in prizes for excellent EA Forum Posts
Luke Eure
· · 3m read
5
5
110
Winners of the African EA Forum Competition!
Luke Eure
· · 2m read
6
6
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
Applications are currently open for the next cohort of AIM's Charity Entrepreneurship Incubation Program in August 2025. We've just published our in-depth research reports on the new ideas for charities we're recommending for people to launch through the program. This article provides an introduction to each idea, and a link to the full report. You can learn more about these ideas in our upcoming Q&A with Morgan Fairless, AIM's Director of Research, on February 26th.   Advocacy for used lead-acid battery recycling legislation Full report: https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/reports/lead-battery-recycling-advocacy    Description Lead-acid batteries are widely used across industries, particularly in the automotive sector. While recycling these batteries is essential because the lead inside them can be recovered and reused, it is also a major source of lead exposure—a significant environmental health hazard. Lead exposure can cause severe cardiovascular and cognitive development issues, among other health problems.   The risk is especially high when used-lead acid batteries (ULABs) are processed at informal sites with inadequate health and environmental protections. At these sites, lead from the batteries is often released into the air, soil, and water, exposing nearby populations through inhalation and ingestion. Though data remain scarce, we estimate that ULAB recycling accounts for 5–30% of total global lead exposure. This report explores the potential of launching a new charity focused on advocating for stronger ULAB recycling policies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The primary goal of these policies would be to transition the sector from informal, high-pollution recycling to formal, regulated recycling. Policies may also improve environmental and safety standards within the formal sector to further reduce pollution and exposure risks.   Counterfactual impact Cost-effectiveness analysis: We estimate that this charity could generate abou
sawyer🔸
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Note: This started as a quick take, but it got too long so I made it a full post. It's still kind of a rant; a stronger post would include sources and would have gotten feedback from people more knowledgeable than I. But in the spirit of Draft Amnesty Week, I'm writing this in one sitting and smashing that Submit button. Many people continue to refer to companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind as "frontier AI labs". I think we should drop "labs" entirely when discussing these companies, calling them "AI companies"[1] instead. While these companies may have once been primarily research laboratories, they are no longer so. Continuing to call them labs makes them sound like harmless groups focused on pushing the frontier of human knowledge, when in reality they are profit-seeking corporations focused on building products and capturing value in the marketplace. Laboratories do not directly publish software products that attract hundreds of millions of users and billions in revenue. Laboratories do not hire armies of lobbyists to control the regulation of their work. Laboratories do not compete for tens of billions in external investments or announce many-billion-dollar capital expenditures in partnership with governments both foreign and domestic. People call these companies labs due to some combination of marketing and historical accident. To my knowledge no one ever called Facebook, Amazon, Apple, or Netflix "labs", despite each of them employing many researchers and pushing a lot of genuine innovation in many fields of technology. To be clear, there are labs inside many AI companies, especially the big ones mentioned above. There are groups of researchers doing research at the cutting edge of various fields of knowledge, in AI capabilities, safety, governance, etc. Many individuals (perhaps some readers of this very post!) would be correct in saying they work at a lab inside a frontier AI company. It's just not the case that any of these companies as
Dorothy M.
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
If you don’t typically engage with politics/government, this is the time to do so. If you are American and/or based in the U.S., reaching out to lawmakers, supporting organizations that are mobilizing on this issue, and helping amplify the urgency of this crisis can make a difference. Why this matters: 1. Millions of lives are at stake 2. Decades of progress, and prior investment, in global health and wellbeing are at risk 3. Government funding multiplies the impact of philanthropy Where things stand today (February 27, 2025) The Trump Administration’s foreign aid freeze has taken a catastrophic turn: rather than complying with a court order to restart paused funding, they have chosen to terminate more than 90% of all USAID grants and contracts. This stunningly reckless decision comes just 30 days into a supposed 90-day review of foreign aid. This will cause a devastating loss of life. Even beyond the immediate deaths, the long-term consequences are dire. Many of these programs rely on supply chains, health worker training, and community trust that have taken years to build, and which have already been harmed by U.S. actions in recent weeks. Further disruptions will actively unravel decades of health infrastructure development in low-income countries. While some funding may theoretically remain available, the reality is grim: the main USAID payment system remains offline and most staff capable of restarting programs have been laid off. Many people don’t believe these terminations were carried out legally. But NGOs and implementing partners are on the brink of bankruptcy and insolvency because the government has not paid them for work completed months ago and is withholding funding for ongoing work (including not transferring funds and not giving access to drawdowns of lines of credit, as is typical for some awards). We are facing a sweeping and permanent shutdown of many of the most cost-effective global health and development programs in existence that sa
Recent opportunities in Animal welfare
44
How will we help the billions of farmed animals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
Tom Billington
· · 8m read
0
0
105
Take action to help insects: UK government consultation [5-10 minutes]
JamesÖz
· · 3m read
6
6
60
U.S. Egg Price Opportunity
Danny Lipsitz 🔸
· · 2m read
9
9
View more