Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Joseph14
0
0

I also want to give a shout out to the EA Anywhere community for those of us that don't have neighborhoods. EA Anywhere's Slack workspace isn't as nice as living within walking distance of friends or getting together for lunch, but it is a really nice little community for those of us that would otherwise require a bus, two flights, and a train to meet in-person.

An additional upside: people from a variety of countries and cultures are there. If I recall correctly, the people who founded and ran EA Anywhere were from three very different countries.

Reply
See in context
by Manuel Allgaier
3 min read 4

89

Building effective altruismCommunityCommunity infrastructureEffective altruism groupsEffective Altruism Forum
Frontpage

TLDR: Consider indicating your approximate location on the EA forum community members map, so local organizers can find you, and maybe take initiative yourself to organize lunch meetups, walks, coworking, anything else you want, all within 10min of where you live or work.

 

Many EA community members (myself included) would like to meet others with shared interests more often without the hassle of long commutes. In EA Hubs like London or Berlin, 30-45min+ commutes to meet other members from your “local” city group are not unusual, which makes shorter meetups like lunches or afternoon walks not feasible. To address this, I’m proposing Neighborhood EA meetups (or “actually local groups”, if you will). 

First, we need a way to find out who lives in your neighborhood. I suggest we use the existing EA forum community members map. Here in Berlin, a few people already specified their locations (approximately, for privacy reasons), but most just put in “Berlin” and are displayed in the city center instead. 

Building EA flatshare clusters 

This map can also be helpful when deciding where to move, or where to book accommodation when visiting. Here in Berlin, we already have a cluster of EA flatshares in Wedding (northwest), around the EA coworking space Teamwork, and there might be potential for a second cluster in Eastern Berlin (Friedrichshain, Kreuzberg, Neukölln) and maybe also Northeast (Prenzlauer Berg). Such clusters could start their own local (neighborhood) chat groups to coordinate coworking, plan events, help others find flats in the area, and more. Message me (for Berlin) or your local EA group organizer, if you'd like to set up or join neighborhood chat groups.

Take the first step now (2min)

If you want to help build a cluster, or just be invited to local events and hangouts, I recommend you: 

  1. Update your location on your EA Forum profile (30 seconds)

    Keep in mind that profiles are public, for privacy reasons I’d recommend not to put in your full address but just your zip code or a nearby landmark such as the closest subway station. Anything within 300m (1000ft) should work. 

  2. Make your profile more approachable (1-5min)

    Upload a photo, connect your Linkedin, Facebook, Insta or personal website, maybe write 1-2 sentences about your interests. 

  3. Spread the word (recommended)

    To get more people to update their profiles, consider (strongly) upvoting this post for visibility, sharing it in your local EA group chat and personally with anyone who might be interested. Who's new in town? Who seems interested in meeting new people?

  4. Take initiative! (optional)

    If you want to meet fellow EAs for lunch, coworking etc, don’t wait for others to do it, but start organizing it yourself. Be the change you want to see. :) 
    Either just pick a date, time and place and then invite 5+ people, or confirm a date with one other person (maybe someone you already know) and then invite everyone else. Don’t overthink it, worst case people just decline or don’t respond. In my experience, people generally appreciate being invited, even if they can’t make it. 

I’ll start (feel free to use this as template): 

I’d be happy to (co-)organize lunches at ~1pm in Berlin-Wedding at my place (near Schäfersee) or at/near Teamwork, the EA coworking space. If you’re interested, update your EA forum profile and message me on Linkedin (preferred), Telegram or Signal. If enough people express interest, I’ll organize it. 

 

For those more motivated and ambitious, this could be the first step to building a friends / community cluster like Priya did in New York, see her Substack article "How to Live Near Your Friends Twenty-two of my friends live within walking distance of me".

What else might help facilitate local connections? Share ideas and experiences in the comments, or message me on Linkedin (preferred) or here on the forum. I'm happy to connect with fellow community builders and spar ideas!

89

0
0
3

Reactions

0
0
3

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Joseph14
0
0

I also want to give a shout out to the EA Anywhere community for those of us that don't have neighborhoods. EA Anywhere's Slack workspace isn't as nice as living within walking distance of friends or getting together for lunch, but it is a really nice little community for those of us that would otherwise require a bus, two flights, and a train to meet in-person.

An additional upside: people from a variety of countries and cultures are there. If I recall correctly, the people who founded and ran EA Anywhere were from three very different countries.

Reply
Andrew Gimber5
2
0

Thanks for the nudge! I’ve just updated my location. For the UK, I think the postcode district (i.e. just the first part of the postcode) strikes a sensible balance between specificity and privacy.

Reply
Severin3
0
0

Good thinking! See here for tips from someone who managed to live in walking distance of 20 friends in New York among all places: https://prigoose.substack.com/p/how-to-live-near-your-friends

Reply
Manuel Allgaier5
0
0

I actually linked this exact article at the bottom of the post, for those more ambitious. Great minds think alike! 🙌 :D

Reply
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Neel Nanda
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
TL;DR Having a good research track record is some evidence of good big-picture takes, but it's weak evidence. Strategic thinking is hard, and requires different skills. But people often conflate these skills, leading to excessive deference to researchers in the field, without evidence that that person is good at strategic thinking specifically. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, but it's hard, and you shouldn't assume I succeed! Introduction I often find myself giving talks or Q&As about mechanistic interpretability research. But inevitably, I'll get questions about the big picture: "What's the theory of change for interpretability?", "Is this really going to help with alignment?", "Does any of this matter if we can’t ensure all labs take alignment seriously?". And I think people take my answers to these way too seriously. These are great questions, and I'm happy to try answering them. But I've noticed a bit of a pathology: people seem to assume that because I'm (hopefully!) good at the research, I'm automatically well-qualified to answer these broader strategic questions. I think this is a mistake, a form of undue deference that is both incorrect and unhelpful. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, and I think this makes me better at my job, but this is far from sufficient. Being good at research and being good at high level strategic thinking are just fairly different skillsets! But isn’t someone being good at research strong evidence they’re also good at strategic thinking? I personally think it’s moderate evidence, but far from sufficient. One key factor is that a very hard part of strategic thinking is the lack of feedback. Your reasoning about confusing long-term factors need to extrapolate from past trends and make analogies from things you do understand better, and it can be quite hard to tell if what you're saying is complete bullshit or not. In an empirical science like mechanistic interpretability, however, you can get a lot more fe
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
46
EA Global Referral Program
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read
6
6
10
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
1
1
32
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
1
1
View more