Hide table of contents

TLDR: Consider indicating your approximate location on the EA forum community members map, so local organizers can find you, and maybe take initiative yourself to organize lunch meetups, walks, coworking, anything else you want, all within 10min of where you live or work.

 

Many EA community members (myself included) would like to meet others with shared interests more often without the hassle of long commutes. In EA Hubs like London or Berlin, 30-45min+ commutes to meet other members from your “local” city group are not unusual, which makes shorter meetups like lunches or afternoon walks not feasible. To address this, I’m proposing Neighborhood EA meetups (or “actually local groups”, if you will). 

First, we need a way to find out who lives in your neighborhood. I suggest we use the existing EA forum community members map. Here in Berlin, a few people already specified their locations (approximately, for privacy reasons), but most just put in “Berlin” and are displayed in the city center instead. 

Building EA flatshare clusters 

This map can also be helpful when deciding where to move, or where to book accommodation when visiting. Here in Berlin, we already have a cluster of EA flatshares in Wedding (northwest), around the EA coworking space Teamwork, and there might be potential for a second cluster in Eastern Berlin (Friedrichshain, Kreuzberg, Neukölln) and maybe also Northeast (Prenzlauer Berg). Such clusters could start their own local (neighborhood) chat groups to coordinate coworking, plan events, help others find flats in the area, and more. Message me (for Berlin) or your local EA group organizer, if you'd like to set up or join neighborhood chat groups.

Take the first step now (2min)

If you want to help build a cluster, or just be invited to local events and hangouts, I recommend you: 

  1. Update your location on your EA Forum profile (30 seconds)

    Keep in mind that profiles are public, for privacy reasons I’d recommend not to put in your full address but just your zip code or a nearby landmark such as the closest subway station. Anything within 300m (1000ft) should work. 

  2. Make your profile more approachable (1-5min)

    Upload a photo, connect your Linkedin, Facebook, Insta or personal website, maybe write 1-2 sentences about your interests. 

  3. Spread the word (recommended)

    To get more people to update their profiles, consider (strongly) upvoting this post for visibility, sharing it in your local EA group chat and personally with anyone who might be interested. Who's new in town? Who seems interested in meeting new people?

  4. Take initiative! (optional)

    If you want to meet fellow EAs for lunch, coworking etc, don’t wait for others to do it, but start organizing it yourself. Be the change you want to see. :) 
    Either just pick a date, time and place and then invite 5+ people, or confirm a date with one other person (maybe someone you already know) and then invite everyone else. Don’t overthink it, worst case people just decline or don’t respond. In my experience, people generally appreciate being invited, even if they can’t make it. 

I’ll start (feel free to use this as template): 

I’d be happy to (co-)organize lunches at ~1pm in Berlin-Wedding at my place (near Schäfersee) or at/near Teamwork, the EA coworking space. If you’re interested, update your EA forum profile and message me on Linkedin (preferred), Telegram or Signal. If enough people express interest, I’ll organize it. 

 

For those more motivated and ambitious, this could be the first step to building a friends / community cluster like Priya did in New York, see her Substack article "How to Live Near Your Friends Twenty-two of my friends live within walking distance of me".

What else might help facilitate local connections? Share ideas and experiences in the comments, or message me on Linkedin (preferred) or here on the forum. I'm happy to connect with fellow community builders and spar ideas!

Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I also want to give a shout out to the EA Anywhere community for those of us that don't have neighborhoods. EA Anywhere's Slack workspace isn't as nice as living within walking distance of friends or getting together for lunch, but it is a really nice little community for those of us that would otherwise require a bus, two flights, and a train to meet in-person.

An additional upside: people from a variety of countries and cultures are there. If I recall correctly, the people who founded and ran EA Anywhere were from three very different countries.

Thanks for the nudge! I’ve just updated my location. For the UK, I think the postcode district (i.e. just the first part of the postcode) strikes a sensible balance between specificity and privacy.

Good thinking! See here for tips from someone who managed to live in walking distance of 20 friends in New York among all places: https://prigoose.substack.com/p/how-to-live-near-your-friends

I actually linked this exact article at the bottom of the post, for those more ambitious. Great minds think alike! 🙌 :D

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism