Newsom's press release and veto message include much more detail and suggest "it's too weak" is not the actual reason.
Reasons mentioned:
- Discrimination by model size
- "SB 1047 only applies to large models, giving us a "false sense of security about controlling this fast-moving technology. Smaller, specialized models may emerge as equally or even more dangerous"
- "Real risks" are limited to critical decision-making, critical infrastructure etc.
- "While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology."
- Newsom wants to focus on "specific, known" "demonstrable risks to public safety" "rooted in science and fact", like the deepfake laws he signed.
For those that have been following this: Is he serious, or is this just lip service and he's blocking it because he was lobbied by people in the tech industry?
(Not super well-informed) My guess is that it's 95%+ lip service. He doesn't seem like someone with scruples or object-level opinions about most things other than what gives him power.
One new thing to me in that thread was that the California Legislature apparently never overrides the governor's vetoes. I wonder why this is the case there and not elsewhere.