The new CMIP7 emissions scenarios are out for the IPCC's seventh assessment report (AR7). See the CarbonBrief explainer for a full breakdown.
Notable changes:
The highest 8.5 scenario was dropped and the now "high" scenario has much less warming
Much of this is because of climate policy and low cost tech; high coal use for electricity is no longer plausible given the low cost of renewables and batteries
No baseline scenario; instead they show less/current/more climate policy, with a medium scenario with current policy at around 2.9°C of warming
Scenarios still depend on a lot of carbon-dioxide removal that hasn't scaled yet
The lowest (1.5°C) and highest (4°C+) scenarios are less feasible. That's mixed news - less chance of the worst case scenarios, but also means we are more likely to still have disruptive ~2.5-3°C warming.
Crossposted to Less Wrong
‘Like most of life’s dangers, the dangers of artificial intelligence are not easily identified from the armchair.’
J Dmitri Gallow
Epistemic status
I’m not an expert in this field, and herein I make some sweeping generalisations educated guesses about the overall...
With the AI windfall, mental health may be taken increasingly seriously by mainstream EA. There’s increasingly room to explore the cause area and answer some of the biggest uncertainties; at the same time, costs of the most effective interventions are continuing to fall. StrongMinds is now treating for ~$35, about a third of GiveWell’s best guess from a few years ago, and is expected to...