Written by LW user Simon Berens.
This is part of LessWrong for EA, a LessWrong repost & low-commitment discussion group (inspired by this comment). Each week I will revive a highly upvoted, EA-relevant post from the LessWrong Archives, more or less at random
Excerpt from the post:
Like most tech bros, I’m a little too interested in productivity and optimizing my life. I’ve even made a few of my own tools to help me stay focused and efficient. In the process of trying to find and build the best productivity tools possible, I discovered common elements among all the productivity tools I found most effective.
I call such tools elastic, because of their similarities to rubber bands. And so, elastic tools
- stretch, meaning that they’re designed to allow for some leeway
- snap back, i.e. after stretching they automatically go back to their intended form
- don’t break, in the sense that you can never stretch them too far
Elastic tools are a marked improvement over standard tools, which typically
- are brittle, allowing no leeway
- don’t help you get back on track
- end up getting ditched
Please feel free to,
- Discuss in the comments
- Subscribe to the LessWrong for EA tag to be notified of future posts
- Tag other LessWrong reposts with LessWrong for EA.
- Recommend additional posts
LessWrong for EA seems like a great idea, and a pretty mediocre specific post to choose - it's very recent, not particularly strongly upvoted by the LW community, and doesn't contribute any of the things I have been excited about seeing from LessWrong for EA.
Thank you for the feedback! I agree that it's not the best one I've reposted. I haven't had much time for digging in the LW archives lately though and I came across it, and it actually helped me make some concrete improvements to productivity, so I thought it could possibly help others. I am realizing now that I may be more excited about the productivity-hack genre than most, so I will keep that in mind moving forward.
If you haven't checked out the ~30 earlier reposts, you can find them by clicking on the tag. I would be surprised if you didn't find ... (read more)