Hide table of contents

Author: Finan Adamson

Last Updated: 03//2022

Overview

This guide goes into detail on food storage, how much food people need, how to know if your food has gone bad, and how to keep your cold food cold. This is meant to give you a tool to reason about how to prepare for and act in emergencies that disrupt your food supply. Ultimately the decision of how much food to store comes down to your own estimation of risk and how prepared you want to be. 

Food Storage

How much food should I store?

Ready.gov recommends you store at least a 3 day supply of non-perishable food. Finan thinks you should have more like two weeks. If it’s easy, it’s totally ok to have more, but for most disasters you won’t be without access to some way of buying food for extended periods of time. We’ve seen in the Covid pandemic that grocery ordering has continued and people can still go into grocery stores relatively safely with sealed N95s or P100s. If things like earthquake or fire disrupted supply chains that could make food much more expensive/scarce, but you’d probably be able to get food or get to food within a month. Something like a nuclear attack could disrupt food supplies for much longer, but you probably have bigger immediate problems at that point and are likely evacuating elsewhere. Food is also not as limiting as water. You can survive much longer without food than without water. 

  • Many online sources agree you need about 2,000-2,500 cal per day. Closer to 2,000 if female and closer to 2,500 if male. Need will also vary with exercise.

What kinds of food should I store?

  • Store things that you like to eat.
    • If you don’t like the food you store, having to eat it will really suck. Morale is important in a disaster. Get good food.
    • Remember to get food in line with your dietary restrictions.
      • If gluten makes you feel ill. Stock foods without gluten.
  • Store things that last a long time.
    • You don’t want to constantly be restocking your supply or get into a disaster and realize all your food has gone bad.
    • Premade emergency food supplies are an option; Or you could get a bunch of canned foods you like and can eat. A bag of rice and lots of canned beans can go a long way.
  • Get some spices. Salt is important for your health and spices will make your food taste better. You don’t want to be stuck eating the same bland rice and beans.

Where should I store my food?

  • Obviously refrigerated things go in the fridge, but for dry storage it’s generally good to keep things somewhere cool and dry. This doesn’t matter a huge amount, it just makes your food last longer. Some food can go bad if the temperature fluctuates a lot.
  • You don’t want your stored food crowding up your living room so see if there is a spare closet or a few cupboards.
  • Another option is under your house if it has an unfinished basement area. If you do this you’ll want to put the food in sealed plastic containers so the wildlife can’t get into it.

How do I know when food has gone bad?

  • Don’t eat food from cans that are swollen, dented or corroded.
  • Does it smell bad?
    • You have a nose that has evolved to smell a bunch of the things that can make you sick. Don’t eat the smelly food (unless it’s supposed to be smelly).
  • Does it taste bad?
    • Same as with smell.
  • Is it moldy?
    • Is there something growing on your food that wasn’t there before? That’s bad. Don’t eat it.


 

Food Strategies in an Emergency

How do I keep my fridge cold if the power goes out?

  • Keep it closed.
    • The more you open the fridge the more heat will get in. This will make your food spoil faster. Only open the fridge when you are ready to take something out to cook/eat.
  • Buy dry ice.
    • Dry ice can often be found at grocery stores and sometimes gas stations. If the power goes out you could go pick some up to keep your food cold for longer.
    • You could also use regular ice, but this will melt fairly quickly and not keep your fridge cool for as long.
      • If using regular ice be sure to put it in something that will hold the water so you don’t soak your fridge when it melts.
  • If you have a generator, you could consider if it’s worth the gas and opportunity cost (of not using your generator for other things) to run your fridge.

What do I take for food if I’m evacuating?

  • If you’re driving: whatever food you had stored for emergencies is great. It’s already food you like to eat with a long shelf life.
  • It gets a bit harder if you have to walk a long way with your food. If you have to do this pack . . .
    • Light, calorie dense food.
      • Things like jerky, protein bars, nuts, etc.
    • Stuff you can cook with a camp stove.
      • Instant mashed potatoes, oatmeal, premade backpacking meals, mac and cheese.
  • More on camp stoves:
    • If you’re driving, getting a bigger camp stove is great.
      • Don’t forget to buy gas canisters for it.
      • You’ll also want cookware and something to eat out of.
    • If you have to hike you’ll want something lighter.
      • A jetboil is great if you never cook in it and just add boiling water to stuff(oatmeal, instant mashed potatoes, etc). It’s also useful for boiling your water to make it safer.
    • Otherwise just get any small/light camp stove with gas canisters.
      • Don’t forget something to cook in and something to eat out of.

How else can I preserve calories?

  • If you’ve run out of food or you know you’re going to run out of food. You can reduce your need for calories by  . . .
    • Exercising less - exercise causes you to burn calories
    • Staying at a reasonable temperature - if you are too cold or too hot your body has to use energy to thermoregulate.

Should I forage when I run out of food?

  • Only if you know what you’re doing. Many plants and mushrooms are poisonous or toxic, so unless you know it’s safe, don’t eat it.
  • If you don’t clean and cook meat properly it could make you sick so the same goes for trapping/hunting. Only do it if you know what you’re doing.
Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thank you for writing up this series, Finan!

One note regarding the sections excerpted below: those who are worried about the quantity of food they are able to keep on hand might spend a few minutes reviewing credible intermittent fasting resources from Harvard,  Johns Hopkins, and elsewhere.  For example, Hopkins describes the 5:2 approach this way: "the 5:2 approach... involves eating regularly five days a week. For the other two days, you limit yourself to one 500–600 calorie meal. An example would be if you chose to eat normally on every day of the week except Mondays and Thursdays, which would be your one-meal days." This CBS interview with Harvard and Yale faculty who practice IF is also informative.

It may be difficult to jump into intermittent fasting in the context of a distressing disaster, but I hope this gives some comfort to some readers: many individuals can average <14,000 calories a week with a 5:2-style plan for extended periods without putting their health at risk, a fact that may be worth keeping in mind in a crisis.

Food is also not as limiting as water. You can survive much longer without food than without water. 

  • Many online sources agree you need about 2,000-2,500 cal per day. Closer to 2,000 if female and closer to 2,500 if male. Need will also vary with exercise.


...How else can I preserve calories?

  • If you’ve run out of food or you know you’re going to run out of food. You can reduce your need for calories by  . . .
    • Exercising less - exercise causes you to burn calories
    • Staying at a reasonable temperature - if you are too cold or too hot your body has to use energy to thermoregulate.
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f