Summary
- The Community Building Grants (CBG) programme will be narrowing its scope to support groups in certain key locations and universities.
- Harri Besceli, who has been running the programme since 2018, is stepping down from the CBG manager role, so we will be hiring a new programme manager. Individuals interested in the role can apply here.
- The CBG programme has opened applications for certain universities (see list below).
- The CBG Programme plans to run hiring rounds in select city / national locations (see list below). The timeline for these application rounds will be announced once a new Programme Manager for the program is hired.
- The Effective Altruism Infrastructure Fund (EAIF) will start assessing applications for grants to pay for full- and part-time organisers from groups not covered by the CBG programme. The EAIF accepts applications at any time.
- All organisers interested in paid community- building roles - regardless of their location - should apply by filling in the EA group organiser funding expression of interest form.
- CEA will continue to provide non-salary funding and support to EA groups in all locations.
Background
Effective Altruism Community Building Grants (CBG) is a programme run by the Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA). It provides grants to individuals and groups to pay for part- and full-time organisers for city, national and university EA groups. Currently, there are 16 groups funded through this programme.
Applications for new CBGs have been closed since August 2020 in order for CEA to focus on assessing and improving the program, although individuals have been able to submit expressions of interest. During this time, we have assessed applications for grant renewals and a small number of urgent new applications as a result of the expressions of interest.
We’ve been able to hire strong organisers when we have worked with groups to run open hiring rounds (in 2020: New York City, Cambridge University). However, these hiring rounds take a substantial amount of time for the CBG programme, which is currently busy with grant renewals and responses to incoming enquiries. As a result, we haven’t been able to provide as much support to grant recipients or recruit organisers to work full-time in some cities and countries that have a large number of highly engaged EAs.
CEA’s plans
Full- and part-time funding for city / national group organisers from some locations
To allow for time to run proactive hiring rounds in key cities and countries, we’ve made the hard decision to select only a few locations to support with the CBG programme at this time. These locations are:
- Australia (national)
- Berlin, Germany (city)
- Boston, USA (city)
- Canada (national)
- Czech Republic (national) (currently on a CBG)
- France (national) (currently on a CBG)
- Germany (national) (currently on a CBG)
- London, UK (city) (currently on a CBG)
- Netherlands (national) (currently on a CBG)
- New York City, USA (currently on a CBG)
- Norway (national) (currently on a CBG)
- Oxford, UK (city)
- San Francisco Bay area, USA (city)
- Sweden (national) (currently on a CBG)
- Switzerland (national)
- Washington DC, USA (city) (currently on a CBG)
These “key locations” currently have the largest number of highly engaged EAs (calculated using a variety of sources, including EA survey data and attendance at virtual events). We wish to make sure locations with a very large number of EAs have strong organisers before funding groups in locations with smaller communities. We would also like to pilot a more intensive support programme (such as group and 1:1 calls) for organisers in these locations, before potentially rolling out this support to other groups.
We also expect to invest in building groups in cities and countries that we think are particularly high priorities in terms of growing EA presence globally. We conducted a preliminary analysis and the only location we’re confident is in that category currently is India. We hope to conduct a thorough analysis and build out this list more once we have organizers in the locations listed above.
Full- and part-time funding for group organisers at some universities
To allow for intensive support in our university program, CEA will prioritize providing CBGs for the following focus universities at the graduate and undergraduate level.
These universities are:
- Brown University, USA
- California Institute of Technology (Caltech), USA
- Columbia University, USA
- Georgetown University, USA
- Harvard University, USA (currently on a CBG)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), UK
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA
- Oxford University, UK (currently on a CBG)
- Princeton University, USA
- Stanford University, USA (currently on a CBG)
- Swarthmore College, USA
- University of California, Berkeley, USA
- University of Cambridge, UK (currently on a CBG)
- University of Chicago, USA
- University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- University of Pennsylvania, USA
- Yale University, USA
These focus universities were chosen primarily based on their track records of having highly influential graduates (e.g. Nobel prize winners, politicians, major philanthropists). We also place some weight on university rankings, universities in regions with rapidly-growing global influence, the track record of its group, and the quality of the group’s current plans.
We expect to include more universities in this list as we build up capacity for our university program. However, we think there are benefits to piloting our university support program with a smaller number of groups.
Criteria for CBG funding
We expect the criteria for CBG funding will not change substantially from the past. Assessments will be based on
- the organiser’s past work and future plans,
- how engaged or promising the current group members are,
- the opportunities for producing more highly engaged/promising EAs.
Basic support for all groups
CEA will continue to provide non-salary support to EA groups in all locations, including
- funding to pay for groups’ operating expenses, such as event costs, books, and website hosting
- online resources
- the EA Groups Newsletter
- personalised advice from the Groups team via calls and messages
- connections with other group organisers through the EA Groups Slack and personal introductions.
CEA will also continue to invest in Virtual Programs, which give people around the world a chance to attend fellowships and reading groups.
Hiring for a CBG Programme Manager
Harri Besceli, who has been running the programme since 2018, is stepping down from his role. We will be hiring a new programme manager. Individuals can apply at this link.
Involvement from the Effective Altruism Infrastructure Fund (EAIF)
We believe there are valuable potential funding opportunities outside of CEA’s key locations and focus universities. We’ve seen strong organisers outside of these groups develop innovative models and contribute to the larger EA ecosystem. As a result, we think it is valuable for these groups to be able to access funding, even though CBGs are currently focused on a small number of groups.
CEA has asked EAIF to assess applications from groups that are not eligible for CBG funding. CEA chose to do this rather than hire more staff, as we believe there will be benefits from us running a more focused programme. EAIF has the capacity and knowledge of movement-building to fill this need.
EAIF recommends grants to improve the work of projects that use the principles of effective altruism, by increasing their access to talent, capital, and knowledge. Until now, they have not accepted applications to fund organisers to run local EA groups, as this opportunity has been provided by the CBG programme.
EAIF will accept grant applications from groups not covered by the CBG programme. Buck Shlegeris, a fund manager from EAIF, will be the main fund manager assessing these applications. The EAIF will use its own criteria for assessing applications, which we expect to be roughly similar to the criteria CEA has been using for CBG applicants (as outlined above). The EAIF accepts funding applications at any time.
Since CEA works regularly with EA groups and organisers, EAIF will usually ask CEA for input on the applications they receive, but will make independent decisions.
Information for groups interested in funding
There is a single expression of interest form for any group interested in funding full- and part-time group organisers, including CBGs and EAIF funding. CEA’s Groups Team will be monitoring this form and sending applications to EAIF or the CBG team for evaluation.
City and National Groups
Groups that currently have CBG funding, and are within our key locations:
- There will be no change to your funding. CEA will assess your applications for grant renewal.
Groups that currently have CBG funding, and are outside our key locations:
- Your CBG grant will continue for the remainder of the grant period. EAIF will assess your applications for additional funding thereafter.
City and national groups outside our key locations that aren’t on a CBG:
- Apply at any time by filling in the EA Funds grant application form.
- If you’d like to chat to someone about applying for a grant, please get in touch with Buck Shlegeris at bshlegeris@gmail.com.
Groups in our key locations that aren’t already on a CBG:
- Once we hire someone to run the CBG programme, we will share the expected timeline for open application rounds on the EA Forum. We will also contact the current organisers of these groups.
- Individuals interested in community building in the locations above can express interest before the hiring round using the CBG expression of interest form. We’d also be interested to hear from you about other potential applicants, whom we should reach out to and encourage to apply. If an applicant is in a time-sensitive situation, we may be able to accommodate an early CBG application.
University Groups
Groups already on a CBG:
- There will be no change to your funding. CEA will assess your applications for grant renewal.
Focus university groups:
CBG funding for focus university groups is now open. We expect to see two types of application, which we will assess at different times:
- CBG applications for summer work (e.g. to spend time planning for the next academic year) or for individuals that have graduated, or will have graduated by next academic year, will be assessed on a rolling basis based on applicant timelines
- CBG applications for part-time work alongside studies will be assessed before the start of the academic year. We may strongly encourage individual applicants in these categories to attend a group leaders training over the summer (more information forthcoming).
- In all cases, if you are interested in applying for CBG funding for a focus university, please submit an expression of interest.
All other university groups:
- Apply at any time by filling in the EA Funds grant application form.
- If you’d like to chat to someone about applying for a grant, please get in touch with Buck Shlegeris at bshlegeris@gmail.com.
Non-local groups such as cause area or affiliation groups:
- These groups can apply to EAIF for funding. Groups can get in touch with the EA Funds team at funds@effectivealtruism.org for more information.
If you have any questions about this new arrangement, are unsure what category your group is in, or want general advice about funding for your group, please contact CEA’s Groups team at groups@centreforeffectivealtruism.org, or comment below.
Edits June 23rd 2021: Small edits to the EAIF information, as EAIF now accepts funding applications at all times, and requests organisers apply directly to them.
Thanks! I need to ask a lot of clarifying questions:
When you say "This is because the type of centralized support CEA might provide and the type of skills/characteristics required of someone working full-time running a university group or a city/national professional network might look very different depending on the ultimate model.", (1) does "This" refer to the fact that you have 2 subteams working with focus locations as opposed to everyone working on all locations? (2) If so, could I reword the explanation the sentence gives to "We need to work on focus locations to figure out the ultimate model before scaling up with that ultimate model"? In even more words, "We want to hire knowing for what model we are hiring, and we want to grow CEA knowing for what model we are growing it as soon as possible."
I really want to know how you mean this!
(3) I interpret your staff capacity being limited as "we need to prioritise" and the prioritisation coming out of that being "prioritise building a model based on focus-locations, then scale later". Correct?
(4) Your staff capacity being limited also suggests the major priority of hiring. I understand CEA is hiring quite fast, but I don't have any idea how fast. Do you think you are prioritising hiring highly enough?
(5) What do you mean by "we think that this focus will enable faster scaling in the long term"? Firstly, again, which "focus" exactly is this referring to? Secondly, isn't "focussing" more intended to improve the quality at the expense of speed of scaling? Intuitively I would say scaling is what enables faster scaling in the long term.
Maybe I can give some context from my side so we can find the crux of this quickly, and we are working in the same direction. I mostly see the lack of a pipeline into full-time CB in non-focus locations in stark contrast to all the extremely high-impact low-hanging fruit in CB and think "This can't be the best we can do". It seems imperative we find a way to funnel talented EAs everywhere into this neglected career path. Hence my insistence on rolling things like the CBGs out in as many locations as possible.
I'm really interested in getting to the bottom of this. I hope I don't come across as intrusive into CEA's decisions without having any background knowledge. My interest is not to criticise CEA, but to solve this problem I see! :)