Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
aaronmayer1
0
0

Woo! Thank you for sharing this! It looks awesome!

Reply
See in context
by emwalz
2 min read 2

11

Building effective altruismCommunityCollections and resourcesCommunity infrastructureCommunity projectsEvent strategyPersonal development
Frontpage

TL;DR: Taking an hour to reflect on how effective you were this year and how you can use this awareness to shape your behaviors for next year is likely one of the highest leverage uses of your time. 

This tool is designed to give you a structured, yet personalized way to do that. It can also be used by groups for collective and individual reflection.

End-of-Year Effectiveness Check-In: A Tool for Personal Reflection 

Intro 

For the past 8 years, I have taken time at the end of every year to reflect on what went well, what didn’t, and how I want to shape my intentions for the coming year. I’ve done this on mini solo retreats, using Year Compass, with friends, and on planes. This year, I wanted to design something specifically for the EA community around the core ethos of bringing our resources into greater alignment with our values. 

--> Link to Tool <--

Suggestions for using this tool individually:

  1. Set aside 1-3 hours of deep focused time.
    1. Spend ~1/3 of your time on each section, with Step 3 likely being the most important. 
    2. **You can print out this tool if you prefer, just scale printing to the width of the page and print each tab.
  2. Pick the top 2-3 intentions going forward and share them with someone who can support you in prioritizing them.
  3. Put these intentions in a place you’ll encounter them regularly. This could be recurring events on your calendar, printing them and putting them on a wall, adding them to your priority management systems, etc. 

 

Ideas for using this in a group setting:

  1. Here’s a run sheet for a 1.5 hr event that supports a group of people using this tool.
    1. 5 mins - Intro: Overview the tool, why it’s valuable, and how the event will go.
    2. 40 mins - Begin: Complete the parts of Sections 1-7 that feel most relevant individually.
    3. 10 mins - Check in as a group: Hows the process going? Any questions or reflections that may support one another in using this tool well? 
    4. 20 mins - Final Section in Pairs: Pair up and spend 
    5. 15 mins - Share out & Debrief: What are 1-2 of your intentions? How can people present support you in achieving them? How did this process go? 

Invitations for Feedback & Further Exploration

If you have ideas for how to improve this tool, who might benefit from using this tool, or want to collaborate on making other tools that might support the EA movement, send me a message. I feel particularly motivated to explore ways the EA community can be supporting one another in capacity building, cultivating great self-awareness, and enhancing our ability to collaborate across differences.

11

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments2


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
aaronmayer1
0
0

Woo! Thank you for sharing this! It looks awesome!

Reply
brook1
0
0

Thanks for making this! I also feel like I get a lot of value out of quarterly/yearly reviews, and this looks like a nice prompting tool. If you haven't seen it already, you might like to look at Pete Slattery's year-review question list too!

Reply
Curated and popular this week
Ben_West🔸
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
> Summary: We propose measuring AI performance in terms of the length of tasks AI agents can complete. We show that this metric has been consistently exponentially increasing over the past 6 years, with a doubling time of around 7 months. Extrapolating this trend predicts that, in under a decade, we will see AI agents that can independently complete a large fraction of software tasks that currently take humans days or weeks. > > The length of tasks (measured by how long they take human professionals) that generalist frontier model agents can complete autonomously with 50% reliability has been doubling approximately every 7 months for the last 6 years. The shaded region represents 95% CI calculated by hierarchical bootstrap over task families, tasks, and task attempts. > > Full paper | Github repo Blogpost; tweet thread. 
Joris 🔸
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Last week, I participated in Animal Advocacy Careers’ Impactful Policy Careers programme. Below I’m sharing some reflections on what was a really interesting week in Brussels! Please note I spent just one week there, so take it all with a grain of (CAP-subsidized) salt. Posts like this and this one are probably much more informative (and assume less context). I mainly wrote this to reflect on my time in Brussels (and I capped it at 2 hours, so it’s not a super polished draft). I’ll focus mostly on EU careers generally, less on (EU) animal welfare-related careers. Before I jump in, just a quick note about how I think AAC did something really cool here: they identified a relatively underexplored area where it’s relatively easy for animal advocates to find impactful roles, and then designed a programme to help these people better understand that area, meet stakeholders, and learn how to find roles. I also think the participants developed meaningful bonds, which could prove valuable over time. Thank you to the AAC team for hosting this! On EU careers generally * The EU has a surprisingly big influence over its citizens and the wider world for how neglected it came across to me. There’s many areas where countries have basically given a bunch (if not all) of their decision making power to the EU. And despite that, the EU policy making / politics bubble comes across as relatively neglected, with relatively little media coverage and a relatively small bureaucracy. * There’s quite a lot of pathways into the Brussels bubble, but all have different ToCs, demand different skill sets, and prefer different backgrounds. Dissecting these is hard, and time-intensive * For context, I have always been interested in “a career in policy/politics” – I now realize that’s kind of ridiculously broad. I’m happy to have gained some clarity on the differences between roles in Parliament, work at the Commission, the Council, lobbying, consultancy work, and think tanks. * The absorbe
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
46
EA Global Referral Program
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read
7
7
10
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
1
1
32
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
1
1
View more