Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Kirsten, EA Lifestyles
2 min read 4

55

Building effective altruismCommunityGlobal outreachNewsletters
Frontpage
This is a linkpost for https://ealifestyles.substack.com/p/ea-in-africa-is-lowkey-thriving

When I first join Anne Nganga on our video call, she apologizes for the background noise of a fan running. “The weather here is hot and humid,” she says. “I have to have a fan or the AC on at all times if I am to enjoy being indoors.”

Anne is originally from Kenya, but she’s calling me from the island of Zanzibar, where she’s been facilitating the 2023 Effective Altruism Africa Residency Fellowship. It took place in the first three months of 2023, connecting EAs working on projects “addressing the most pressing problems in Africa”.

Residencies have become an increasingly popular option for Effective Altruism community building. They typically involve a group of people who work on Effective Altruism or related topics professionally working and living in the same place for 1-3 months, in order to help those people get to know each other, build trust and develop new partnerships and opportunities. In the last year, Prague and Mexico City have both hosted residencies. 2022’s “Bay area summer” was arguably a residency as well, and perhaps the first example I can think of was the FTX EA Fellowship that flew EAs to the Bahamas at the beginning of 2022. So I was curious how this most recent EA residency turned out, how the FTX collapse affected their plans, and what we can expect going forward from EA in Africa.

What’s a day in the life in the Zanzibar residency?

In the morning, the residents spend time working remotely on their projects, before lunch at their coworking space.

In the afternoon, Anne says, “we typically have three hours of structured engagement time” such as a guest speaker (irl or over Zoom), a hangout, or an informal conference amongst the attendees.

“On the off chance we do not have anything planned, residents would typically be engaged in one social activity or another. They would either be at the pool, or at the beach bar, or hanging out at one of the restaurants, or going to Stonetown which is a UN Heritage [Site].”

Did the FTX collapse change plans for your residency?

“I personally live very frugally, and the same could be said for my cofounder Daniel,” Anne says. She’s talking about Daniel Yu, CEO of African tech company Wasoko, who moved to Zanzibar and opened a Wasoko office as part of the government’s “Silicon Zanzibar” initiative last year. He also provided the funding for the residency.

“Fumba [the town in Zanzibar where the fellowship was located] was just the perfect compromise between being reasonable but also meeting most of the needs [of our residents]” like internet access, transport, healthcare and places to unwind and have fun.

“Of course we expect a bit more scrutiny [since the FTX collapse], but we did not deviate in any way from what we had planned to do.”

What else can we expect from EA in Africa?

“We’ve got two very ambitious projects,” says Anne. “We have plans to set up an EA group here in Zanzibar [and we have set up a call to discuss] a self-sustaining pan-African EA group.”

And what happens next for the 18 residents? “They’re gonna go back to their home countries,” Anne says. “And I’m happy to report that indeed, I know I have made friends for life.”

This post is from my email newsletter, EA Lifestyles. Subscribe for weekly updates or read more posts now.

55

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments4


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Yelnats T.J.78
15
0

I think the title is misleading. Africa is a large continent, and this was just one fellowship of ~15 people (of which I was one). There are some promising things going on in EA communities in Africa. At the same time, and I speak for several people when I say this, EA community building seems quite neglected in Africa, especially given how far purchasing power goes. And many community building efforts to date have been off the mark in one way or another.

I expect this to improve with time. But I think a better barometer of the health of EA in Africa is the communities that have developed around Africa metropolises (e.g. EA Abuja, EA Nairobi).


I also dislike Fumba being framed to the broader EA community as the perfect compromise. Fumba town was arguably the thing that the residents most disliked. There are a lot of valid reasons as to why the residency took place in Fumba, but this general rosy framing of the residency overlooks the issues it had and, more importantly, the lessons learned from them.

Reply
Kirsten7
3
0

I appreciate the feedback, and would love to hear more about your experience (I think many of us would!)

Reply
Guy Raveh5
3
0

Thanks for writing this! I've been waiting to hear how that residency played out.

Reply
monadica3
0
0

Would like to connect with the cohort members or the team organising  this  community. 

Reply
More from Kirsten
116
Most research/advocacy charities are not scalable
Kirsten
· · 3m read
48
48
111
Clarifying the Petrov Day Exercise
Kirsten
· · 4m read
53
53
64
4 Ways to Give Feedback to Job or Grant Applicants
Kirsten
· · 4m read
4
4
View more
Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
TL;DR In a sentence:  We are shifting our strategic focus to put our proactive effort towards helping people work on safely navigating the transition to a world with AGI, while keeping our existing content up. In more detail: We think it’s plausible that frontier AI companies will develop AGI by 2030. Given the significant risks involved, and the fairly limited amount of work that’s been done to reduce these risks, 80,000 Hours is adopting a new strategic approach to focus our efforts in this area.   During 2025, we are prioritising: 1. Deepening our understanding as an organisation of how to improve the chances that the development of AI goes well 2. Communicating why and how people can contribute to reducing the risks 3. Connecting our users with impactful roles in this field 4. And fostering an internal culture which helps us to achieve these goals We remain focused on impactful careers, and we plan to keep our existing written and audio content accessible to users. However, we are narrowing our focus as we think that most of the very best ways to have impact with one’s career now involve helping make the transition to a world with AGI go well.   This post goes into more detail on why we’ve updated our strategic direction, how we hope to achieve it, what we think the community implications might be, and answers some potential questions. Why we’re updating our strategic direction Since 2016, we've ranked ‘risks from artificial intelligence’ as our top pressing problem. Whilst we’ve provided research and support on how to work on reducing AI risks since that point (and before!), we’ve put in varying amounts of investment over time and between programmes. We think we should consolidate our effort and focus because:   * We think that AGI by 2030 is plausible — and this is much sooner than most of us would have predicted 5 years ago. This is far from guaranteed, but we think the view is compelling based on analysis of the current flow of inputs into AI
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
32
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
1
1
15
Applications to EAGxCDMX close in a week!
cescorza
· · 2m read
0
0
50
What comes after the Introduction Fellowship? A tool and approach for community organizers
Brooke O'Connell 🔸
· · 5m read
9
9
View more